Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.058
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum As-Syar'i : Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mimbar Kampus QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA Jurnal Al-jina'i Al-islami
Fauziah Lubis
UIN Sumatera Utara
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 50 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 50 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Sanksi Pelanggaran Kode Etik Advokat   Ary Darma Prastio; M. Irkham; Fauziah Lubis
El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 3 No 3 (2023): El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (969.791 KB) | DOI: 10.47467/elmujtama.v3i3.2931

Abstract

This study aims to find out what forms of violations are often committed by an Advocate. Violation becomes a problem if an advocate violates the law, because an advocate has a code of ethics that regulates it in proceedings before a court or helps resolve a case. Advocates must comply with a code of ethics and if they violate it, an advocate will receive sanctions. There are advocates who commit acts of violating the law, such as abusing their duties in defending clients so that the cases they handle win in court. Keywords: Violation, Code of Ethics, Sanctions
Peranan Advokat Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Ismail Adha; Rio Bayu Riansyah Harahap; Fauziah Lubis
El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 3 No 3 (2023): El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (921.152 KB) | DOI: 10.47467/elmujtama.v3i3.2932

Abstract

riminal justice is a system created to deal with crime problems that can disturb order and threaten people's sense of security, is one of the community's efforts to control crime so that it is within acceptable limits of tolerance. In the criminal justice system in Indonesia, it is known that there are four institutions that play a role, namely the police which act as an investigative and investigative agency, the prosecutor's office which acts as an institution that carries out prosecutions, the Supreme Court as an institution that oversees judges in the court environment, and Correctional Institutions. The existence of Advocates as law enforcers has been regulated in Article 5 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates. However, regarding the actual form and place of the Advocate's role as law enforcer, it is still unclear, especially in its role as a supporting component for the realization of an integrated criminal justice system, as a result, criminal law enforcement in Indonesia has not been optimal. This research uses normative legal research methods or literature studies, namely by analyzing UU.RI. No. 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates and UU.RI No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), as well as other laws and regulations and library materials related to the role of Advocates to answer problems. The results of the study show that in terms of form and place, there are 2 (two) roles of advocates as law enforcers, namely (1) the role of advocates in the form of legal assistance to perpetrators based on Article 54 of the Criminal Procedure Code, (2) the role of advocates in the form of legal assistance to victims who regulated outside the Criminal Procedure Code. It is hoped that this will serve as input for law enforcers in upholding law and justice in Indonesia. Keywords: advocate, criminal justice
Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Mengatasi dan Mencegah Tindak Pidana Berita Bohong (Hoax) Fauziah Lubis; Muhammad Roni Pratama; Ahmad Raihan Mubarak
El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 3 No 3 (2023): El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/elmujtama.v3i3.3119

Abstract

Fake news, also known as Hoax, is becoming increasingly popular for us to hear and is also rife in various media. Starting from print media and online media. Fake news is false or untrue information that is fabricated or distorted from real facts. The problems we discuss in this research include: How is the Criminal Law Policy in Overcoming and Preventing Fraud News Crimes According to Current Positive Law and How Criminal Law Policies are in Overcoming and Preventing Fraud News Crimes in the Future. This research is normative research. The rules regarding fake news (Hoax) which are clearly included in the Criminal Code are contained in Article 390, while the rules regarding fake news (Hoax) contained in the law are contained in law no.11 of 2008 and law no. 1 of 1946. Renewal of Law No. 11 of 2008, namely Law No. 19 of 2016. The role of the government and society is contained in Law Number 19 of 2016 and is listed in articles 40 and article 41. Rules regarding Criminal Acts of Fake News (Hoax) in the renewal criminal law is contained in the 2019 Criminal Code Bill in Article 272. Keywords: Criminal Law Policy; Hoax; Criminal Law Reform.
Pemahaman dan Pengaturan Peran Organisasi Advokat di Indonesia Dalam UU No 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat Erika Nurul Hidayah; Mawaddah Permatasari; Fauziah Lubis
As-Syar'i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol 6 No 1 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i1.3221

Abstract

This study aims to determine the formation of Advocate Organizations in Indonesia as mandated in Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates, in fact it has caused a polemic regarding which Advocate Organizations are recognized by the law. As it is known that the 1945 Constitution has provided fundamental protection for freedom of association and assembly, the provisions of that article provide a constitutional basis that every Advocate actually has the right to establish more than one Advocate Organization, so from this it was found a misunderstanding in the Advocate Law, which confuses the notion of an organization and its formation with what is the true meaning of the purpose of establishing a single forum in the Advocate profession. This paper is intended so that the formation of this single forum does not lead to conflicts of struggle between Advocates without prejudice to the freedom and independence of Advocates which is in line with the goals of a modern democratic rule of law which requires the role of the government in the formation of this single forum. Keywords: Understanding, Setting, Organization
Problematika Penegakan Qanun Jinayat di Aceh M. Arif Fadillah A. Tanjung; Firmansyah Firmansyah; Fauziah Lubis
As-Syar'i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol 6 No 1 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i1.3328

Abstract

After the enactment of Qanun No. 6 Year 2014 on (Qanun Jinayat), several problems arose, both internal and external. After the enactment of Qanun No. 6 of 2014 on (Qanun Jinayat), several problems arose, both internal and external problems. Internal problems arise with a variety of problems, facilities and infrastructure are not yet complete, the emergence of polemics about the place of execution of flogging, socialization is still considered insufficient, uneven resolution of Qanun Jinayah enforcement problems in each district / city, the emergence of differences in interpretation in Jinayat cases resolved by Jinayat law and Qanun fostering customary law, between one gampong and another gampong differ in the type of customary sanctions on khalwat, varied in the type of sanctions and law enforcement. More specifically, the internal problems faced in the implementation of Qanun Jinayat in Aceh are from the law enforcement apparatus itself (Wilayatul Hisbah, Police, Attorney General's Office, and Syar`iyah Court) and traditional leaders who have different perceptions of Qanun Jinayat. This not only leads to variations in application, but also often obscures the legal certainty desired by a regulation. The author conducts this research using empirical juridical research method which is a legal research method that uses empirical facts taken directly from the object of research in this case including the Community, University, and Islamic Shari'at Office of Aceh Province either by conducting interviews or direct observation. and with conceptual and statutory approaches using normative juridical methods. The data source used is data obtained indirectly through literature study. The legal materials obtained are then analyzed using descriptive-qualitative analysis to obtain conclusions that can be scientifically accounted for.
Kesaksian Justice Collaborator Sebagai Keringanan Hukuman dalam Mengungkap Kejahatan Narkotika dan Kaitannya dengan Maslahah Mursalah Zaid Alfauza Marpaung; Fauziah Lubis; Budi Sastra Panjaitan
Jurnal Al-Jina'i Al-Islami Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Al-Jina'i Al-Islami (June)
Publisher : Islamic Criminal Law Study Program, Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jaa.v1i2.790

Abstract

Abstrak: Kejahatan narkotika di Indonesia merupakan extraordinary crime yang melibatkan sindikat terorganisir, sehingga sulit diungkap dengan metode konvensional. Salah satu instrumen penting dalam membongkar jaringan ini adalah justice collaborator, yakni saksi pelaku yang bekerja sama dengan aparat penegak hukum. Penelitian ini bertujuan menelaah kedudukan justice collaborator dalam perkara narkotika serta relevansinya dengan prinsip maslahah mursalah. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan hukum Islam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemberian keringanan hukuman bagi justice collaborator sah secara yuridis sekaligus dapat dipertanggungjawabkan secara syar‘i karena menghadirkan kemaslahatan publik. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penghubungan konsep justice collaborator dengan maslahah mursalah, yang memberi kontribusi bagi pengembangan regulasi hukum pidana Indonesia. Kata Kunci: Justice collaborator, narkotika, maslahah mursalah   Abstract: Ditulis Drug crimes in Indonesia are extraordinary crimes involving organized syndicates, making them difficult to uncover using conventional methods. One important instrument in dismantling these networks is the justice collaborator, namely a witness who is also a perpetrator who cooperates with law enforcement officials. This study aims to examine the position of justice collaborators in narcotics cases and their relevance to the principle of maslahah mursalah. The method used is normative juridical research with a regulatory and Islamic law approach. The results of the study show that granting leniency to justice collaborators is legally valid and can be justified in Islamic law because it brings about public benefit. The novelty of this study lies in linking the concept of justice collaborators with maslahah mursalah, which contributes to the development of Indonesian criminal law regulations. Keyword: Justice collaborator, narcotics, maslahah mursalah
The Amicus Curiae of the Indonesian Advocates Association : Challenging the Rigidity of Criminal Procedure Law Fauziah Lubis; Sayyid Al Umam Sitepu; Nur Syakirah
Jurnal Hukum Vol 42, No 2 (2026): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v42i2.42906

Abstract

This study aims to measure the impact of the Indonesian Bar Association's submission of an amicus curiae brief on public trust in criminal trial outcomes and to explain the social mechanisms behind this impact. Using normative juridical methods, this study finds that the Indonesian Bar Association's role as an amicus curiae has three significant social impacts on the criminal trial process in Indonesia. Media publicity is a necessary prerequisite. The social impact of the Indonesian Bar Association's amicus curiae brief is not inherent in the legal document itself, but arises from the interaction between professional legal intervention and public communication. For policy, this means that bar associations in civil law jurisdictions should integrate the drafting of legal documents. These findings provide evidence that non-state legal actors can restore institutional legitimacy through structured third-party intervention. For policy, this study offers a replicable model for advocate associations in civil law jurisdictions that seek to improve public accountability without sacrificing judicial independence. The role of the Indonesian advocate association in amicus curiae in the future can encourage Substantive Justice, thereby helping judges to understand the sense of justice that lives in society, so that decisions do not merely uphold the law procedurally.
Penalaran Contra Legem Yudisial dalam Pembagian Harta Bersama Perkawinan: Perspektif Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah dan Keadilan Distributif Siti Arifah Syam; Mhd. Syahnan; Fauziah Lubis
JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Gema Perencana
Publisher : POKJANAS Bekerja Sama Biro Perencanaan dan Penganggaran, Sekretariat Jenderal Kementerian Agama RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61860/jigp.v4i2.333

Abstract

The distribution of marital joint property after divorce in Indonesian Islamic family law is normatively regulated by Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), which mandates an equal division (50:50) between spouses. However, the rigid application of this provision often fails to achieve substantive justice, as it disregards actual contributions, power relations within marriage, and structural gender inequalities. This study aims to examine the legitimacy of contra legem judicial decisions in marital property disputes and to reconstruct a more just model of distribution based on the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The analysis is grounded in John Rawls’ theory of distributive justice as the grand theory, Satjipto Rahardjo’s progressive law as the middle theory, and Yasser Auda’s maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah framework as the applied theory. The findings demonstrate that the mechanical 50:50 division of joint property represents formal equality rather than substantive justice and, in certain cases, perpetuates injustice against the economically and socially disadvantaged spouse, particularly women. The study further finds that contra legem judicial rulings in joint property cases possess strong juridical, philosophical, and ethical justification when based on factual contributions and contextual realities. From a maqāṣid perspective, the distribution of marital property must prioritize justice (al-‘adl), protection of wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl), and public welfare (maṣlaḥah), rather than mere numerical equality.
Juridical Review of Waqf Land Disputes Due to Transition as Public Facilities (Disputes and solutions) Tety Marlina Tarigan; fauziah lubis
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4180

Abstract

Waqf as an integral part of Islamic teachings is a guideline for social worship which requires the separation and/or handover of part of the assets belonging to the waqf to be utilized in accordance with sharia, as regulated in Law Number 41 of 2004. The main purpose of waqf is devotion to Allah SWT and devotion. public. However, waqf practices often do not run in an orderly and efficient manner, as evidenced by the lack of data collection which causes many waqf assets to be poorly maintained and even transferred to third parties unlawfully. This research uses a descriptive method with a juridical-sociological approach. The focus is to understand the procedures, situations and views of the community regarding waqf practices, as well as measuring the effectiveness of the law in handling waqf disputes. It is hoped that the research results can provide further understanding of the challenges and solutions in managing waqf in society, as well as support efforts to advance the goals of waqf, which are actually for worship and general welfare in accordance with Islamic sharia. The aim of this research is to find out how Agrarian law works in the case of Waqf Land Disputes resulting from the Transition as Public Facilities. 
EFEKTIVITAS MEDIASI SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA NON-LITIGASI DALAM PEMBATALAN HIBAH KEPADA ANAK KANDUNG SEBAGAI AHLI WARIS: Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Medan Belawan Ingah Maulana; Mhd. Yadi Harahap; Fauziah Lubis; Arifuddin Muda Harahap
QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, Desember 2026
Publisher : ASIAN PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58738/qanun.v5i2.1739

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik mediasi serta efektivitasnya sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa nonlitigasi dalam pembatalan hibah kepada anak kandung sebagai ahli waris di Kecamatan Medan Belawan. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh semakin seringnya sengketa hibah dalam lingkungan keluarga yang tidak hanya menimbulkan persoalan hukum mengenai kedudukan hibah dan warisan, tetapi juga berpotensi merusak hubungan kekeluargaan. Meskipun mediasi telah banyak digunakan dalam penyelesaian sengketa keluarga, kajian empiris mengenai efektivitasnya dalam perkara pembatalan hibah masih relatif terbatas. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data primer diperoleh melalui wawancara, observasi, dan dokumentasi, sedangkan data sekunder diperoleh dari Kompilasi Hukum Islam, peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur ilmiah, serta putusan Pengadilan Agama Medan yang berkaitan dengan pembatalan hibah. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif melalui tahapan reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mediasi merupakan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa yang efektif karena didukung oleh adanya itikad baik para pihak, kemampuan mediator membangun komunikasi dan kepercayaan, serta kuatnya budaya musyawarah yang masih hidup di masyarakat. Penyelesaian melalui mediasi tidak hanya memberikan kepastian hukum terhadap kedudukan hibah, tetapi juga mampu menjaga hubungan kekeluargaan, mengurangi potensi konflik berkepanjangan, serta mewujudkan kemaslahatan sesuai dengan prinsip hukum Islam. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa mediasi merupakan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa nonlitigasi yang efektif dalam perkara pembatalan hibah kepada anak kandung sebagai ahli waris karena mampu mengintegrasikan kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan tanpa mengabaikan keharmonisan hubungan keluarga.
Co-Authors Abdau Abdi Chaniago Ade Yusrah Hasanah Adji Prasetia Agustina Berutu Ahmad Irpan Ahmad Raihan Mubarak Aina Fazira Aina Kholilah Lubis Ainul Mardhiyah Khaidir Aja Maimuna Akbar Maulana Alif Randi Ramadhan Amalia Nurzannah Amanda Fildzah Sagala Annisa Radila Tarigan Arifuddin Muda Harahap Ary Darma Prastio Aulia Fahira Hanan Aulia Nisma Budi Sastra Panjaitan Chandra Akbar Saputra Chantika Andini Saragih Dea Ratna Sari Siregar, Dedy Syahputra Denni Herdiansyah Dinda Nurul Khotimah Erika Nurul Hidayah Fauza Az-Zahra Jambak Firmansyah Firmansyah Fitrah Humairah Hamidatul Luhuriyah Hikmah Amna Mnr Ibnu Ilham Pratama Indra Pratama Ine Pebrianti Harahap Ingah Maulana Iqbal Yudha Pratama Ismail Adha Izzatunnada Izzatunnada Januar Januar Kharunnisa Kharunnisa Khofifah Nabila Lara Nopi Dayanti M. Arif Fadillah A. Tanjung M. Irkham M. Ridho Hakim M. Yusuf Alfi Syahrin Sir M.Raja Parluhutan Rambe Maharani Maharani Mahdi Nasution Mawaddah Permatasari Meilisa Naiborhu Melinna Anggraini Melisa Siregar Mhd Alwin Mhd. Syahnan Mhd. Yadi Harahap Miswar Nasution Muhammad Fathony Muhammad Roni Pratama Muhammad Royhan Muthia Erina Nasution Mutiara Sachputri Nabila Yasmine Al Khanis Nisa Permata Sari Nur Dalilah Harahap Nur Syakirah Nurhidayati Nurhidayati Nursaidah Rambe Ratih Syahputri Raydatul Maqfirah Rio Bayu Riansyah Harahap Rizki Ananda Utami( Rizki Zil Ikram Rambe Rudi Pratama Sahrizal Rambe Sari Ramadani( Sayyid Al Umam Sitepu Siti Arifah Syam Sri Wardani Sirait Syifauzzahrah Syifauzzahrah Tengku Maulana Syah Tety Marlina Tarigan Tri Nastiya Vivin Kadriani Matondang Wahda Hilwani Damanik Widya Kusvie Ayuningtyas Wiwied Sekar Arum Wulan Syaputri Zahra Hayati Zaid Alfauza Marpaung Zulfan Baihaqi Zulfikri Zulfikri  Chairany Kartika Sipayung,  Tiara Nabila