Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Kawakib Journal of Shoutheast Asian Islam and Society (JSEAIS)
Syaiful Dinata
UIN Sunan Kalijaga
Religion Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Perbandingan Pemikiran Al-Ghazali dan Ibnu Taimiyah Tentang Amar Ma’ruf Nahi Munkar Syaiful Dinata; Eva Latipah; Ismatul Izzah
Jurnal Kawakib Vol 3 No 2 (2022): Studi Keislaman
Publisher : Program studi Keagamaan Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/kwkib.v3i2.48

Abstract

This research is a study of the Islamic thought of two Islamic figures, namely Al-Gazhali and Ibn Taimiyah, regarding calling for good and preventing from bad (amar ma'ruf nahi munkar). This research is motivated by the difference in thinking of the two scholars regarding (amar ma'ruf nahi munkar). Seeing this phenomenon, a reassessment of amar ma'ruf nahi munkar is very important and urgent to do. The research questions are: how al-Gazhali and Ibn Taimiyah think about amar ma'ruf nahi munkar; and how do the two figures differ and differ in their thoughts on amar ma'ruf nahi munkar? This study aims to describe the thoughts of Al-Gazhali and Ibn Taimiyah about amar ma'ruf nahi munkar, looking for differences and similarities between the two. This research is a literature-based research. The method used is a qualitative descriptive research method. The results showed that the method of practice of amar ma'ruf nahi munkar (especially nahi munkar) compiled by Al-Gazhali was carried out in stages, starting from the mild stage such as notifying the perpetrators of the mundane, to the more violent or decisive stage such as threatening or even hitting. Meanwhile, Ibn Taimiyah, carrying out his practical method, namely the subtle way is the way of amar ma'ruf nahi munkar. Affection is the foothold of amar ma'ruf nahi munkar. Therefore, Ibn Taimiyah taught that in practice goodness (maslahat) must take precedence over ugliness (mafsadhat).
Analisis Kedudukan Akal Perspektif Hamka Syaiful Dinata
Journal of Southeast Asian Islam and Society Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): JSEAIS
Publisher : UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/jseais.v3i1.1544

Abstract

A study of the position of reason needs to be carried out in order to be able to distinguish between right and wrong, and good and bad. Many previous Muslim figures who provided sheets of their writings discussed the intricacies and problems of reason. However, the issue of the position of reason is still being discussed around certain issues, especially in Islamic thematic issues. This fact is of course very concerning, because an issue as important as reason should not escape serious discussion. The problem in this research is how to describe the position of reason in Hamka's perspective. The purpose of this study is to analyze the position of reason from the perspective of Hamka. By using a descriptive qualitative research method, the findings of this study illustrate that the position of reason from the perspective of Hamka, namely the position of reason is an important thing in human life, because it is the determinant of good and evil. Reason is the ability to think that is in human beings, and is also explained as a manifestation or embodiment of one's soul. According to Hamka reason is a bond, meaning that with the position of reason in the human soul, it will keep people from following seductions, traps, even the shackles of lust.
Co-Authors Eva Latipah Ismatul Izzah