Dini Nuraeni
Geospatial Information Agency of Indonesia; Department of Geography, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Indonesia

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

SPATIAL MACHINE LEARNING FOR MONITORING TEA LEAVES AND CROP YIELD ESTIMATION USING SENTINEL-2 IMAGERY, (A Case of Gunung Mas Plantation, Bogor) Dini Nuraeni; Masita Dwi Mandini Manessa
International Journal of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences (IJReSES) Vol 19 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Ikatan Geografi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30536/j.ijreses.2022.v19.a3830

Abstract

Indonesia's tea production and export volume have fluctuated with a downward trend in the last five years, partly due to the increasingly competitive world tea quality. Crop yield estimation is part of the management of tea plucking, affecting tea quality and quantity. The constraint in estimating crop yields requires technology that can make the process more effective and efficient. Remote sensing technology and machine learning have been widely used in precision agriculture. Recently, big data processing, especially remote sensing data, machine learning, and deep learning have been carried out using a cloud computing platform. Therefore, we propose using GeoAI, a combination of Sentinel-2A imagery, machine learning, and Google Collaboratory, to predict ready for plucking tea leaves at optimal plucking time at Gunung Mas Plantation Bogor. We used selected bands of Sentinel-2A and extracted more features (i.e., NDVI) as a training set. Then we utilized the tea blocks boundary and tea plucking data to generate labels using Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The classification results were further used to estimate the production of crop tea yield. The RF classifier is able to achieve overall accuracy at 51% and SVM at 54%. Meanwhile, accuracy at optimally aged tea blocks is able to achieve at 75.62% for RF and 52.88% for SVM. Thus, the SVM classifier is better in terms of overall accuracy. Meanwhile, the RF classifier is superior in predicting ready for plucking tea at optimally aged tea blocks.