Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis Journal of Social Research
Shelly Febriana Kartasari
Universitas Sriwijaya
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Hubungan Antara Praktik Ekonomi, Lingkungan, Sosial, dan Tata Kelola dengan Nilai Perusahaan Efek Mediasi Kinerja Keuangan Meiliza Nuraini; Mukhlis; Shelly Febriana Kartasari
Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis Vol. 5, No. 3 (September 2023)
Publisher : SAFE-Network

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37034/infeb.v5i3.593

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of economic, environmental, social and governance performance on companies with financial performance as a mediating variable. This study took a sample of 10 companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, which were published in financial reports from 2017-2022. This research analysis method using path analysis. The results of the study show that economic performance, environmental performance, social performance and governance performance have no effect on firm value. Financial performance has no effect on company value both before Covid-19 and after Covid-19. Before Covid-19 economic performance had an effect on company value, but after Covid-19 economic performance had no effect on company value. Before and after Covid-19 environmental performance did not affect company value Before Covid-19 social performance had an effect on company value, but after Covid-19 social performance had no effect on company value. Before and after Covid-19, governance performance did not affect company value. Economic performance, environmental performance, social performance, and governance performance did not directly affect company value through financial performance, both before Covid-19 and after Covid-19.
Systematic Literature Review: Inconsistencies and Developments in Ownership Structure and Board Characteristics in Sustainability Reporting Mona Nur Adhillah; Inten Meutia; Shelly Febriana Kartasari
Journal of Social Research Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v4i2.2438

Abstract

This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method to analyze inconsistencies and developments in ownership structure and board characteristics concerning sustainability reporting. Sustainability reporting has emerged as a pivotal tool for corporations to showcase their economic, social, and environmental responsibilities. However, significant discrepancies exist in the relationship between ownership structures, board attributes, and the quality of sustainability disclosures globally. Drawing upon 37 relevant articles published between 2015 and 2024, this research identifies critical trends and gaps. Ownership structures, including foreign, institutional, and family ownership, show varied impacts on sustainability reporting across developed, developing, and mixed-economy countries. For instance, foreign ownership often drives transparency in developing nations due to external pressures, while governmental ownership exhibits mixed effects depending on regulatory and market dynamics. Similarly, board characteristics like gender diversity, independence, and the presence of sustainability committees significantly influence the quality of sustainability disclosures. These relationships, however, are subject to regional governance maturity and cultural norms. The study highlights the dominance of quantitative methodologies in existing literature, with limited exploration of mixed-method approaches. Findings also reveal that inconsistencies in results are rooted in differences in regulatory environments, market pressures, and cultural expectations. Developed nations exhibit greater adherence to stringent sustainability standards, while developing countries face challenges in harmonizing local priorities with global frameworks. By addressing these inconsistencies, this research contributes to advancing the understanding of ownership and governance dynamics in sustainability reporting. It also underscores the need for globally harmonized reporting standards to ensure consistent, high-quality sustainability practices.
Co-Authors Inten Meutia Meiliza Nuraini Mona Nur Adhillah Mukhlis Mukhlis