Heribertus Untung Setyardi
Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KEWAJIBAN NEGARA SEHUBUNGAN DENGAN TERJADINYA PELANGGARAN KEISTIMEWAAN DAN KEKEBALAN DIPLOMATIK OLEH PEJABAT DIPLOMAT Setyardi, Heribertus Untung
Justitia et Pax Vol 34, No 2 (2018): Justitia et Pax Volume 34 Nomor 2 Tahun 2018
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (345.644 KB) | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v34i2.1874

Abstract

AbstractIn order to carry out the duties of representatives abroad, diplomatic representatives are given privileges and immunity. However, in practice there have been several cases where diplomatic officials violated the provisions of the 1961 Vienna Convention, especially the abuse of privileges and immunities they had. This violation has a certain effect in the form of an obligation for the state, both the recipient country and the sender to overcome this violation. In this regard, this paper intends to discuss what obligations should be carried out by the state in connection with the violation of diplomatic privileges and immunities by diplomatic officials themselves. The results of this paper show that there are several things that can be done by the state to respond to violations committed by diplomatic officials in the recipient country. The recipient country can declare a persona non-grataor expel a diplomatic representative back to the country of origin. In addition, the recipient country may also request the sending country to remove immunity held by the diplomatic officer concerned. As for the recipient country, the country can consider removing the immunity of its diplomatic officials, as well as calling back to the country of mission. Keywords: state’s obligation, violation, diplomatic privilege and immunityIntisari Dalam rangka menjalankan tugas perwakilan di luar negeri, perwakilan diplomatik diberikan keistimewaan dan kekebalan. Kendati demikian, dalam praktek ditemukan beberapa kasus di mana pejabat diplomatik melakukan pelanggaran terhadap ketentuan Konvensi Wina 1961, terkhusus penyalahgunaan hak keistimewaan dan kekebalan yang dimilikinya. Pelanggaran ini tentu menimbulkan akibat tertentu berupa kewajiban bagi negara, baik negera penerima maupun pengirim untuk menanggulangi pelanggaran ini. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut, tulisan ini hendak membahas kewajiban seperti apa yang perlu dilakukan negara sehubungan dengan terjadinya pelanggaran hak keisitimewaan dan kekebalan diplomatik oleh pejabat diplomatik itu sendiri. Hasil dari penulisan ini menunjukan bahwa ada beberapa hal yang dapat dilakukan oleh negara untuk menanggapi pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh pejabat diplomatik di negara penerima. Untuk negara penerima dapat menyatakan persona non-grata maupun mengusir perwakilan diplomatik kembali ke negara asal. Selain itu, negara penerima dapat juga meminta negara pengirim untuk menanggalkan kekebalan yang dimiliki pejabat diplomatik yang bersangkutan. Sedangkan bagi negara penerima, negara tersebut dapat mempertimbangkan untuk menanggalkan kekebalan yang dimiliki pejabat diplomatiknya, maupun melakukan pemanggilan kembali ke negara perutusan. Kata kunci:Kewajiban Negara, Pelanggaran, Kekebalan dan Keistimewaan Diplomatik
Indonesian Legal Readiness: Regulation of Right to be Forgotten in Relation to Big Data Heribertus Untung Setyardi
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Juni 2023
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v7i1.5174

Abstract

Abstract Big Data is one of the new technological breakthroughs that marks the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Big Data has been widely used by entities in Indonesia to obtain and share data and information effectively and efficiently. In connection with this, through this paper the author intends to connect the Big Data phenomenon with the Right to be Forgotten (RBF) concept stipulated in Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, because both are related to electronic data and information. The aim is to see the compatibility between the two. In related of the matter above, it was found that the regulation of RBF in Indonesia does not seem to support the existence of Big Data. This is because RBF arrangements in Indonesia have weaknesses, including, first, the absence of rules regarding the type of information that can be requested to be removed through the RBF mechanism; second, Indonesian law cannot reach the jurisdiction of other countries if the data and information shared through Big Data technology are outside Indonesian territory; third, the absence of benchmarks to determine whether the request for removal of electronic information and data is accepted or rejected. Keywords: Big Data, Right to be Forgotten, Indonesian Law
Right To Be Forgotten Vis-À-Vis Hak Atas Informasi Heribertus Untung Setyardi
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v8i1.6529

Abstract

Abstract Right to be forgotten (RBF)is defined as a mechanism provided by electronic system providers to delete electronic information or electronic documents that are considered irrelevant in relation to a person. When looking at the meaning of RBF, it can be said that this is also closely related to information, because one of the things that is asked to be "forgotten" is information. Talking about information, it cannot be separated from Law Number 14 of 2018 concerning Public Information Disclosure. This law emphasizes that information is a basic need for everyone in developing themselves. Moreover, obtaining information is a right guaranteed in a country that upholds human rights. In this regard, through this paper the author will answer the question whether the presence of the RBF strengthens the right to information that has been guaranteed in Law No. 14 of 2008 or vice versa. Keywords: Right to be forgotten, right to information, human rights. Abstrak Right to be forgotten (RBF) atau yang biasa disebut dengan “hak untuk dilupakan” diartikan sebagai suatu mekanisme yang disediakan oleh penyelenggara sistem elektronik untuk menghapus informasi elektronik maupun dokumen elektronik yang dianggap tidak relevan berkaitan dengan diri seseorang. Apabila melihat sepintas dari makna RBF tersebut, dapat dikatakan bahwa hal ini juga mempunyai kaitan erat dengan informasi, sebab salah satu hal yang dimintai untuk “dilupakan” ialah mengenai informasi. Berbicara mengenai informasi, maka tidak dapat dilepas-pisahkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2018 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik. Undang-Undang ini menegaskan bahwa informasi merupakan suatu kebutuhan pokok untuk setiap orang dalam mengembangkan dirinya. Terlebih lagi untuk memperoleh informasi merupakan suatu hak yang dijamin dalam negara yang menunjung tinggi hak asasi manusia. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut, lewat tulisan ini penulis akan menjawab suatu pertanyaan apakah kehadiran RBF ini menguatkan hak atas informasi yang selama ini dijamin dalam UU No. 14 Tahun 2008 ataukah sebaliknya. Kata Kunci: Right to be forgotten, ha katas informasi, HAM