Jeane Neltje Sally
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN BANK TERHADAP TIDAK TANGGUNG JAWABNYA BANK DALAM KASUS PENIPUAN KODE ONE TIME PASSWORD DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN (Studi Putusan Nomor 170 K/Pdt. Sus-BPSK/2020) Regina Christhalia; Jeane Neltje Sally
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of writing this journal or article is to find out how Bank Consumer Protection Against Bank Actions in OTP Code Fraud Cases is viewed from Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. By using the library study research method based on laws and regulations, it can be concluded that bank customers as consumers need to be protected in accordance with legal provisions, and banks also need to apply the precautionary principle and be responsible for consumers in accordance with existing regulations. But sometimes there are problems between the customer and the bank. One of them is the problem with decision No. 170 K/Pdt. Sus-BPSK/2020 . From the writing that was done, it can be seen that the decision of the lawsuit in Article 19 paragraphs 1 and 3 of the Consumer Protection Act states that consumers who feel aggrieved can directly claim compensation from the producer and must provide a response and or be resolved within 7 days after the transaction takes place.
LEGAL PROTECTION OF FAMOUS BRANDS BASED ON LAW NUMBER 20 OF 2016 CONCERNING BRANDS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS Donny Agus Prakoso; Jeane neltje sally
Journal Equity of Law and Governance Vol. 4 No. 1
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55637/elg.4.1.9446.52-62

Abstract

Brand protection (including well-known brands) in Indonesia is regulated in Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications replacing the previous regulation, namely Law Number 15 of 2001 concerning Marks. Even though there are already regulations in place, brand disputes in Indonesia still often occur, especially similarities in essence. The title adopted by the author in writing this thesis is "Legal Protection of Famous Brands Based on Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Famous Brands and Geographical Indications." The research method used in this research is a normative legal research method. The purpose of this research is to find out or answer the questions: 1) Does Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Famous Marks and Geographical Indications provide a guarantee of protection for famous brands in Indonesia? 2) Has Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Famous Marks and Geographical Indications been truly implemented so that it can guarantee optimal protection of ownership of famous brands in Indonesia? Based on the analysis of the research results, the author concludes that Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Brands and Geographical Indications has guaranteed protection for well-known brands in Indonesia. This protection is specifically contained in Article 21 paragraph (1) letters b and c, and Article 83 paragraph (2). Then it is clarified in the Explanation of Article 21 paragraph (1) letter b, Explanation of Article 76 paragraph (2), and Explanation of Article 83 paragraph (2). The next conclusion is that Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications has not been implemented optimally so that it cannot guarantee satisfactory protection of ownership of well-known brands in Indonesia. The Panel of Judges at both the District Court and Supreme Court levels did not implement the mandate of Law Number 20 of 2016