Agussalim Agussalim
Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, Universitas Hasanuddin

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Typology of Poverty and Its Implications for Poverty Reduction Policies Agussalim Agussalim
EcceS (Economics, Social, and Development Studies) Vol 9 No 2 (2022): December
Publisher : Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam UIN Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/ecc.v9i2.32778

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify conditions, characteristics, access, social environment, and opportunities that can be utilized by the poor based on regional typology in Gorontalo Province. From the results of this study, it is hoped that various policies can be formulated to help the poor get out of the poverty trap. Poverty research based on analysis of three regional typologies, namely urban, rural and coastal areas, has never been done before in Gorontalo Province. The method used in this study is descriptive-qualitative method. The types of data used are primary data and secondary data. The study will be carried out in three regional typologies, namely urban, rural and coastal areas, according to the regional characteristics of the Gorontalo Province. The location sampling technique was carried out by taking area samples in stages (multistage area sampling) to determine the research location villages. The population in this study is all poor households living in the six selected sub-districts/villages. Sampling in the six sub-districts/villages surveyed was carried out using a simple random sampling technique. The results of the study show that in general, household vulnerability to poverty seems to be associated with regional aspects, where households living in rural areas have a higher vulnerability than households in urban and coastal areas. From the survey results in three regional typologies (urban, rural, and coastal) in Gorontalo Province, it can be generally concluded that income poverty and non-income poverty are more dominant in poor households in rural areas compared to urban and coastal areas. In other words, those who live in rural areas live in poorer conditions than those who live in urban and coastal areas. From a policy perspective, this means that efforts to reduce poverty in rural areas will be relatively more difficult than the other two regions. The implication of this research is that efforts to reduce poverty in a sustainable manner need to focus more on aspects of improving the quality of human resources for poor households in all regional typologies. The government needs to design various programs that aim to: (i) reduce the number of illiterate poor people and improve their skills; (ii) increasing access of the poor to public services (especially education and health) and economic resources (especially business capital); and (iii) intensifying programs to empower the poor, through the provision of micro credit, assistance with business equipment, work-intensive programs, and others.
The Effect of Regional Government Expenditures on Regional Development Inequality in Eastern Indonesia, 2015-2020 Viqra Ramadanti; Agussalim Agussalim; Sultan Suhab
Jambura Equilibrium Journal Vol 5, No 1 (2023): Vol 5. No. 1. January 2023
Publisher : Gorontalo State University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37479/jej.v5i1.16949

Abstract

The existence of differences in resources and processes in the implementation of development in a region causes the ability of each region to encourage the development process also to be different, which causes problems of development inequality between regions. Therefore, an analysis of regional development disparities needs to be carried out. This study aims to analyze the effect of local government spending, the Human Development Index (HDI), and economic growth on regional development inequality in Eastern Indonesia in 2015-2020. This research approach uses a quantitative approach. The data type used is panel data, 12 Provinces in Eastern Indonesia for six years (2015-2020). The analysis tool uses panel data regression with a Fixed Effect Model approach. The results indicate that the variables of government spending on education, health, infrastructure, and human development index directly affect regional development inequality. Meanwhile, the economic growth variable does not affect regional development inequality.
Analisis Flypaper Effect Pada Belanja Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan Mar’atus S Amir; Agussalim Agussalim; Sultan Sahab
Development Policy and Management Review (DPMR) Volume 1 Issue 2 December 2021
Publisher : Development Policy and Management Review (DPMR)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (299.692 KB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis terjadi atau tidaknya flypaper effect pada Belanja Daerah di Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari Badan Pusat Statistik dan sumber lain berupa data time series yang terdiri dari 15 tahun dari 2006 sampai 2020 di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Data yang digunakan adalah data Belanja Daerah, Dana Alokasi Umum, Pendapatan Asli Daerah, dan PDRB Perkapita di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan yang dianalisis menggunakan Model Regresi Linear Berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa selama periode pengamatan, Dana Alokasi Umum tidak berpengaruh terhadap Belanja Daerah di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan sedangkan Pendapatan Asli Daerah berpengaruh positif terhadap Belanja Daerah. Adapun PDRB Perkapita justru berpengaruh negatif terhadap Belanja Daerah di Provinsi Sulawesi. Dari hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan tidak mengalami Flypaper Effect tahun anggaran 2006-2020.
Pengaruh Investasi dan Tenaga Kerja terhadap Kemiskinan di Sulawesi Selatan Novita Wulandari; Agussalim Agussalim; Retno Fitrianti
Development Policy and Management Review (DPMR) Volume 2 Issue 1 June 2022
Publisher : Development Policy and Management Review (DPMR)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (365.545 KB)

Abstract

Kemiskinan adalah salah satu tolok ukur kondisi sosial ekonomi dalam menilai keberhasilan pembangunan yang dilakukan pemerintah di suatu daerah dan merupakan suatu keadaan yang menyangkut ketidakmampuan dalam memenuhi tuntutan kehidupan yang paling minimum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh investasi secara tidak langsung terhadap kemiskinan melalui pertumbuhan ekonomi dan menganalisis pengaruh tenaga kerja secara tidak langsung terhadap kemiskinan melalui pertumbuhan ekonomi di Sulawesi Selatan. Penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder berupa time series, 2002-2018 yaitu data investasi (PMA dan PMDN), tenaga kerja, PDRB, dan kemiskinan. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah Two Stage Least Square dengan empat variabel penelitian yakni; x1 (investasi), x2 (tenaga kerja), y1 (pertumbuhan ekonomi), y2 (kemiskinan). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaruh investasi tidak berpengaruh terhadap kemiskinan melalui pertumbuhan ekonomi sementara tenaga kerja berpengaruh terhadap kemiskinan melalui pertumbuhan ekonomi.
Analisis Faktor-Faktor Kemiskinan Di Daerah Kabupaten: Kasus Kabupaten Bone Juhasni Bahar; Agussalim Agussalim; Retno Fitrianti
Development Policy and Management Review (DPMR) Volume 2 Issue 1 June 2022
Publisher : Development Policy and Management Review (DPMR)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (382.11 KB)

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui serta menganalisis pengaruh PDRB perkapita, upah minimum dan tingkat inflasi terhadap kemiskinan di Kabupaten Bone.Permasalahan yang dihadapi Kabupaten Bone pada tahun 2017 dimana tingkat kemiskinan Kabupaten Bone berada pada peringkat ke-10 diantara Kabupaten/Kota yang ada di Sulawesi Selatan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode analisis regresi linear berganda menggunakan data sekunder dari tahun 2000-2017di Kabupaten Bone yang bersumber dari Dinas ketenagakerjaan dan transmigrasi Sulawesi Selatan dan Badan pusat statistik (BPS). Data tersebut diolah menggunakan software komputer (IBM SPSS). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan sebesar 83.0% dapat menjelaskan variasi perubahan tingkat kemiskinan Kabupaten Bone. Sisanya sebesar 17.0% ditentukan oleh variabel atau faktor lain di luar model. Secara Parsial PDRB perkapita dan inflasi positif dan tidak signifikan terhadapa tingkat kemiskinan di Kabupaten Bone sedangkan upah minimum berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap tingkat kemiskinan di Kabupaten Bone.