Hatarto Pakpahan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI SANKSI TINDAKAN BAGI PENGGUNA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA Hatarto Pakpahan
Arena Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2014)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (820.412 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2014.00702.5

Abstract

AbstractDrug abusers to yourself (addicts) basically get bail rehabilitation but the criminal provisions of Article 127 of Law Repulik Indonesian law number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics with the threat of imprisonment . In the practice of law enforcement when someone is abusing narcotics for yourself also applied criminal Article 111 and Article 112 or Article 114 because even meet the elements of:  have, save,master, and or buy. This paper aims to find , test and analyze whether the sanctions measures can be used as an alternative form of sanctions, and the sanctions that can be used as an alternative sanction in the reformulation of narcotic crime in the future . This paper is made based on the results of research using the normative with Statute Approach, Case Approach , Conceptual Approach and Comparative Approach . The results showed that the drug abusers themselves should only be penalized in the form of medical rehabilitation measures and social rehabilitation for drug abusers are victims as well as sick people who should get treatment so it can recover . Although his actions comply with Article 111 and Article 112 or Article 114 even if the mens rea is to be used for the actors themselves to be in rehab.Key words: abusers, victims, narcotics, rehabilitation  AbstrakPenyalah guna narkotika bagi diri sendiri (pecandu)pada dasarnya mendapatkan jaminan rehabilitasi akan tetapi dalam ketentuan pidana pasal 127 undang undang no 35 tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika dengan ancaman pidana penjara. Dalam praktek ketika seseorang yang menyalahgunakan narkotika bagi diri sendiri juga diterapkan pidana pasal 111 dan atau pasal 112 bahkan pasal 114 karena juga memenuhi unsur “memiliki”, “menyimpan”, “menguasai” dan atau “membeli”.Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui, menguji dan menganalisis apakah sanksi tindakan dapat dijadikan sebagai alternatif sanksi serta bentuk sanksi tindakan yang dapat dijadikan sebagai sanksi alternatif dalam reformulasi tindak pidana narkotika dimasa mendatang.Tulisan ini dibuat berdasarkan hasil penelitian normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan Statute Approach, case Approach,  Conceptual approach dan komparatif Approach.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Penyalah guna narkotika bagi diri harusnya hanya dikenakan sanksi tindakan berupa rehabilitasi medis dan rehabilitasi sosial karena penyalah guna narkotika adalah korban sekaligus sebagai orang sakit yang harus mendapatkan pengobatan sehingga dapat pulih kembali. Sekalipun perbuatannya memenuhi pasal 111 dan atau pasal 112 maupun pasal 114 jika sikap bathin (mens rea) pelaku adalah untuk digunakan bagi diri sendiri harus di rehabilitasi.Kata kunci: penyalah guna, korban, narkotika, rehabilitasi
Analisis Kedudukan Hukum Lie Detector dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Hatarto Pakpahan; George Renjaan
MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): November,2025
Publisher : Postgraduate University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the legal standing of using a lie detector in the settlement of the premeditated murder case committed by Jesika Kumala Wongso against I Wayan Mirna Salihin, and to determine the implementation of applying the lie detector in the premeditated murder criminal case. The type of legal research used in this study is normative legal research, and the method of addressing the problem uses the statutory approach and the case approach. The research results show that the legal standing of using the Lie Detector constitutes valid evidence as referred to in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, namely expert testimony. This is because the results of the examination using the Lie Detector method are then printed out and explained again by an expert who possesses the necessary capability. Therefore, the position of the lie detector in the evidentiary process of the criminal case in Supreme Court Decision Number 498K/PID/2017 is as a complement to the decision-making process, as the judge's conviction was already obtained based on evidence with high probative value, and the Supreme Court judge upheld the decisions of the first-instance and appellate courts.