Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PEMIKIRAN TEOLOGIS KAUM SALAFÃŽ: Studi atas Pemikiran Kalam Ibn Taymiyah Washil, Izzuddin; Fata, Ahmad Khoirul
ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam Vol 19, No 2 (2018): Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

In the field of kalam (Islamic theology), some major themes, like attributes of Allah, will of Allah and human freedom, or Quran as words of Allah, have become debate topics between thought schools of kalam in Islam. Because of the complexity of those topics, the debate becomes eternal, without an agreed end. Among those thought schools of kalam in Islam involved in the debate is salaf school, held by Ibn Taymiyah. In his opinion, the school is the right one because it quite conforms to Quran and sunna. By way of thought (manhaj) of salaf school, Ibn Taymiyah also takes part in explaining those major themes in his works. In the case of the will of Allah and human freedom, for example, he doesnâ€™t agree with the Qadarite schoolâ€™s thought and the Jabarite schoolâ€™s thought although in this he hasnâ€™t yet stretched out a convincing explanation. This essay will analyze the way of thought (manhaj) of salaf school and Ibn Taymiyahâ€™s opinion about those major themes, especially in his book MajmÃ»â€˜ al-FatÃ¢wÃ¢.

Pemikiran Ibn TaymÄ«yah tentang SharÄ«â€˜ah sebagai Tujuan Tasawuf Washil, Izzuddin; Fata, Ahmad Khoirul
TEOSOFI: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 7 No. 2 (2017): December
Publisher : Program Studi Filsafat Agama Fakultas Ushuluddin dan Filsafat UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Ibn Taym?yah rejects no all doctrines of Sufism although he criticizes some of them. He, for an instance, does firmly refuse altogether the doctrine of wa?dat al-wuj?d and fan??. Ibn Taym?yah has a unique concept of sufism, which differs from other concepts of Sufism promulgated by other sufis, especially those of Wuj?d?yah proponents. Ibn Taym?yah?s concept of Sufism puts great emphasis on it appropriateness with stipulations of shar??ah. The compatibility of shar??ah and tasawuf has been the main feature of his model of Sufism. When other Sufis start their mystical journey from the stage of shar??ah, Ibn Taym?yah puts shar??ah as the final stages. To him shar??ah is the main goal of mystical journeys; tasawuf should be based on shar??ah and it also must end to shar??ah. Using al-Taftaz?n??s perspective this study finds that the character of Ibn Taym?yah?s Sufism is Ta?awwuf Akhl?q?. This is so because he prefers to purify morality than such mystical experiences as wa?dat al-wuj?d or fan?? and the uses of symbols to reveal the mystical experiences.

Realizing The Religion As The Source Of Harmony In A Multicultural Society Izzuddin Izzuddin; Ahmad Khoirul Fata
Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 8 No 2 (2020): Jurnal Kontemplasi
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/kontem.2020.8.2.171-202

Abstract This paper examines the potential of religion as the main source of harmony in a plural society. This paper itself is motivated by the fact that religion has two different faces: integrative and confrontational. On the one hand religion can encourage integration in society, however religion also has the potential to cause conflict and tension in the community, especially in the people with complex levels of diversity. In multicultural societies, integrative religious attitudes are needed to avoid conflicts. But making it happen is not as easy as turning our hand. The factor of understanding religious texts that are exclusive and based on hatred is one of the challenges. This will be further complicated when external factors (economic, political) are involved. By using philosophical-reflective methods, the writer offers two ways of religious that can create harmony in different cultures and beliefs, namely: exclusivenes-tolerance religious, and willingness to engage in interfaith dialogue. With these two things the writer believes that religious people still feel comfortable with the truth of their own religion, and at the same time they live in peace with people of different religions. Keywords: Diversity, Conflict, Multicultural Society, Exclusive-Tolerant, interfaith Dialogue. Abstrak Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang potensi agama sebagai sumber utama harmoni dalam masyarakat majemuk. Tulisan ini sendiri dilatar belakangi oleh kenyataan bahwa agama memiliki dua wajah yang saling berbeda: integratif dan konfrontatif. Di satu sisi agama bisa mendorong terjadinya integrasi dalam masyarakat, namun demikian agama juga berpotensi menimbulkan konflik dan ketegangan di tengah masyarakat, khususnya masyarakat dengan tingkat keragaman yang kompleks.Dalam masyarakat multikultural, sikap beragama yang integratif sangat diperlukan agar tidak terjadi konflik. Namun mewujudkannya tidak semudah membalikkan tangan. Faktor pemahaman terhadap teks-teks keagamaan yang tertutup dan didasari kebencian menjadi salah satu tantangan. Ini akan semakin rumit ketika faktor-faktor eksternal (ekonomi, politik) turut terlibat. Dengan menggunakan metode filosofis-reflektif penulis menawarkan dua cara beragama yang bisa mewujudkan harmoni dalam masyarakat yang berbeda budaya dan keyakinan, yaitu: keberagamaan yang ekslusif-toleran, dan kesediaan diri untuk melakukan dialog antarumat beragama. Dengan dua hal ini penulis meyakini umat beragama tetap merasa nyaman dengan kebenaran agamanya sendiri, dan di saat bersamaan mereka hidup damai dengan umat agama yang berbeda. Kata Kunci : Keberagamaan, Konflik, Masyarakat Multikultural, Ekslusif-Toleran, Dialog Antaragama.

HAM ISLAM DAN DUHAM PBB: Sebuah Ikhtiar Mencari Titik Temu Izzuddin Washil; Ahmad Khoirul Fata
MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman Vol 41, No 2 (2017)
Publisher : State Islamic University North Sumatra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30821/miqot.v41i2.394

Abstrak: Meski secara umum memiliki kesamaan dengan Deklarasi Umum Hak Asasi Manusia (DUHAM) Perserikatan Bangsa-bangsa, konsep Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) dalam Deklarasi Kairo memiliki spesifikasi tertentu yang berbeda. DUHAM bersumber dari paradigma Barat, sementara Deklarasi Kairo berbasis syariat. Dilihat dari perspektif DUHAM, ada beberapa hal spesifik dalam HAM versi Dunia Islam yang dinilai melanggar HAM. Konsep kebebasan beragama berbeda antara keduanya. Juga tentang hukuman mati, rajam, dan yang lainnya. Dengan demikian apakah HAM versi Islam tersebut harus dipertentangkan dengan DUHAM? Alih-alih mempertentangkan keduanya, tulisan ini mencoba mempertemukan keduanya dengan mencarikan alternatif jawaban. Dengan melakukan pemaknaan ulang terhadap beberapa konsep Islam, tulisan ini menemukan adanya peluang agar Deklarasi Kairo dengan DUHAM bisa berjalan beriringan. Abstract: Islamic Human Rights and the United Nations Human Rights Declaration: in Search of Compromise. Although generally in common with the United Nations Human Rights Declaration (DUHAM), the concept of Human Rights in the Cairo Declaration has different specifications. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights comes from the Western paradigm, while the Cairo Declaration is based on the Shari'a. Viewed from the perspective of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, there are some specific issues in the human rights of the World Islamic version that are considered to violate human rights. The concept of freedom of religion differs between the two. It is also true in the context of death penalty, stoning, and others. Thus does the human rights of the Islamic version be contrasted with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights? Instead of contrasting these two aspects, this paper tries to reconcile them by finding an alternative answer. By re-enacting some Islamic concepts, this paper finds an opportunity for Cairo Declaration with the Universal Declaration to go hand in hand in harmony. Kata Kunci: hak asasi manusia, PBB, deklarasi Kairo, syariat Islam

PROBLEM SUBJEKTIFITAS DALAM TAFSIR BI AL-MA’TSUR, TAFSIR BI AL-RA’YI, DAN TAFSIR BI AL-ISYARAH Izzudin Washil
Diya Al-Afkar: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan al-Hadis Vol 4, No 01 (2016): JUNI
Publisher : IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Subjektivitas adalah salah satu faktor penyebab terjadinya kesalahan dalam penafsiran. Untuk menghasilkan penafsiran yang benar, sang penafsir harus membuang jauh-jauh unsur subjektif dirinya. Pertanyaannya, mungkinkah dalam proses penafsiran sang penafsir dapat membuang unsur subjektif dirinya? Bukankah dalam proses penafsiran, unsur subjektif sang penafsir tidak bisa dilepaskan dari diri sang penafsir itu sendiri? Jika demikian halnya, bagaimana mengatasi dilema subjektivitas (yang menjadi penyebab kesalahan, di satu sisi, dan menjadi unsur tak terpisahkan, di sisi lain) ini dalam penafsiran? Untuk menjawab dilema ini, satu hal perlu ditegaskan, subjektivitas penafsir pasti ada dalam proses penafsiran, namun tidak semua subjektivitas itu menjadi penyebab kesalahan. Subjektivitas yang menjadi penyebab kesalahan adalah subjektivitas yang tidak lagi menghiraukan rambu-rambu penafsiran yang sudah digariskan para ahli tafsir, subjektivitas yang berusaha menaklukkan nash di bawah kepentingan pribadi atau mazhabnya. Namun, jika subjektivitasnya masih mengikuti kaidah-kaidah penafsiran yang disepakati para ulama tafsir disertai niat ijtihad mencari kebenaran, maka subjektivitas macam ini adalah subjektivitas yang dibenarkan. Kata kunci: subjektifitas penafsir, dilema subjektifitas, subjektifitas penyebab kesalahan dan subjektifitas yang dibenarkan.

SYARIAH DALAM KONTEKS NEGARA MODERN DI DUNIA ISLAM Mazro’atus Sa’adah
Dauliyah Journal of Islamic and International Affairs Vol 3, No 2 (2018): DAULIYAH (JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS)
Publisher : UNIDA Gontor

Discussions about sharia, especially Islamic political issues, were never discussed from the time of the Apostles until now. In the 1970s the power of Islam rose almost throughout the Islamic world. The Arab Spring affirms the importance of sharia enforcement. Many constitutions in the Muslim World include Islamic law clauses as the highest law. This issue will see how important it is to understand sharia, Islamic law, and fiqh, which will later become the basis for determining the typology of the State and related to the entry of sharia as its constitution. This article will also discusses the modernization of family law carried out by several Islamic countries, as a form of strengthening that Islam accepts modernization and not westernization.

DILEMA TRADISI DAN MODERNITAS TELAAH ATAS “KRITIK NALAR ARAB” MUHAMMAD ABID AL-JABIRI Izzuddin Washil
Khatulistiwa Vol 3, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : The Pontianak State Institute of Islamic Studies

Al-Jabiri denominated his interpretation project of the Arabic tradition as the Arabic reasoning critique (naqd al-aql al-arabi). The project began from his concern over the present reality of the Arab and Islamic world which arguably is still underdeveloped and his desire to present a new thought methodology as a tool to get out of the slump and awaken to the preferred reality. Al-Jabiri differentiated two traditions, one that refers to the tadwin of Islam as part of Islamic-Arabic tradition and the other referring to and departing from the European Renaissance (modernity). The gap between "what was there" (the traditions of our past) and "what is here" (Western civilization) is growing wide and steep. This condition, according to him, made most of us miss the romanticism of our past, but at the same time there is a desire to break away with that tradition. This is the condition that has spawned "a Split Consciousness" of the Arab society, torn between subjective and objective factors, between the ideological burdens and the objective historical reality which is increasingly far from the ideal progress of modern civilization. In the context of modern-contemporary Arab thought, the tendency of literal-textualist thought, (read: tendency of traditionalism) can in fact be referred — though partly —to the framework bayani reasoning system, as well as other trends in favor of modernity based on burhani reasoning system as something that comes from the outside, that goes through the translation process in the tadwin period. The attraction between the two tendencies of tradition and modernity, according to Al-Jabiri, should be used as the realization of a new tadwin moment, with the new size, standard, and enlightenment, on a single principle: "modernization" (reform of thought, tahdits) requires the fulfillment of the prerequisites of "traditionalization" (back to tradition), and similarly "traditionalization" requires the fulfillment process of "modernization."

Nabi Musa Menampar Malaikat Maut: Jalan Tengah Polemik Hadis Musykil Izzuddin Washil; Ahmad Khoirul Fata
Jurnal Ilmiah AL-Jauhari: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Interdisipliner Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah AL-Jauhari
Publisher : Pascasarjana IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Hadith which tells the story of the Prophet Musa slapping the angel of death invites polemic among the scholars. There is a group that can accept it with various explanations, there are also those who consider death is unacceptable even though the sanad is valid. Therefore this hadith is included as an improbable hadith. This paper tries to find a way out of the polemic. In this discussion, the author can accept opinions that reject this Hadith if the flow of understanding can be accounted for. However, the author can also accept opinions that accept it if the flow of understanding can be accounted for. An important part that must be revealed immediately in this hadith is the certainty whether or not Moses knew that what came to him was the grim reaper. If an explanation of this has been obtained, of course, we are easier to determine the attitude of accepting or rejecting this hadith. But certainty is difficult to obtain because the text of this hadith does not explicitly inform it. So what must be done now is tawaqquf.

Hadis Gadir Khum Dalam Pandangan Syiah Dan Sunnah Washil, Izzuddin; Fata, Ahmad Khoirul
AL-DZIKRA: JURNAL STUDI ILMU AL-QUR'AN DAN AL-HADITS Vol 12 No 1 (2018)
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Religious Study, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/al-dzikra.v12i1.2925

Hadis Gadir Khum yang menjadi titik tolak perpisahan mazhab Sunni dan Syiah juga terdapat dalam kitab-kitab hadis utama kaum Sunni. Seperti kaum Syiah, para ulama Sunnah juga mengakui keabsahan derajat hadis-hadis tersebut. Bahkan hadis-hadis itu dianggap mutawatir. Namun demikian, antara kaum Syiah dan Sunni memiliki pemahaman yang berbeda terhadap hadis-hadis tersebut. Perbedaan terjadi dalam memahami kata mawlā. Sunni berpendapat bahwa kata itu bermakna pelindung/penolong, sementara Syiah berpendapat bahwa kata itu bermakna khalifah/pemimpin. Perbedaan pemahaman ini membawa kedua kelompok tersebut terlibat dalam pertengkaran sepanjang sejarah Islam. Namun demikian, banyak kalangan di Sunni dan Syiah yang berupaya membangun hubungan harmonis dengan mencari hal-hal yang sama di antara keduanya. Semata-mata untuk kepentingan ukhuwwah Islāmiyyah dan kejayaan umat Islam.

Title

Found 9 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 9 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 9 Documents
Search