Benny Krestian Heriawanto
Universitas Islam Malang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KEWAJIBAN MENYIMPAN PROTOKOL NOTARIS DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA MENURUT HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA Benny Krestian Heriawanto
Arena Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2018)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (6456.428 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2018.01001.6

Abstract

AbstractThis article is designed to investigate and analyze the legal consequence of non-performance obligation to keep the Notary protocol by a Notary. Performing the position, a notary is required to behave in a certain way, some of the behaviors are recognized as ethical behavior which is stipulated in the ethic code and as obligation that is established by Notary Profession Act. One of the behaviors demand is the obligation to keep the Notary protocol and cause legal consequence for the non-fulfillment obligation.. This article is analyzed with Normative Legal Research Method with statute and conceptual approach. Based on the study and analysis can be concluded that the violation of the obligation, Notary who is proven intentionally or negligently perform the obligation of Notary to save Notary protocol, there are responsibility and/or accountability that cause legal consequence, in the form of sanctions both administrative, civil and even criminal. AbstrakArtikel ini disusun bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis akibat hukum atas tidak dilaksanakannya kewajiban menyimpan Protokol Notaris oleh seorang Notaris. Dalam melaksanakan tugas jabatan, Notaris dituntut untuk berperilaku dengan cara tertentu, sebagian perilaku tersebut diakui sebagai perilaku etis yang diatur dalam kode etik dengan kewajiban yang ditetapkan oleh Undang undang tentang Jabatan Notaris. Salah satu tuntutan perilaku tersebut adalah kewajiban menyimpan protokol Notaris dan tidak dipenuhinya kewajiban tersebut menimbulkan akibat hukum. Artikel ini disusun dengan normatif legal research metode dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Berdasarkan hasil kajian dan analisa dapat disimpulkan bahwa dengan dilanggarnya kewajiban tersebut,  Notaris yang terbukti dengan sengaja atau lalai melaksanakan kewajiban untuk menyimpan protokol Notaris terdapat tanggung jawab dan/atau tanggung gugat yang melahirkan akibat hukum berupa sanksi baik administratif, perdata dan bahkan pidana.
Penyelesaian Permohonan Pailit Melalui Instrumen Insolvency Test Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Terkait Dalam Kepailitan Muhammad Dito Zakharia; Ahmad Syaifudin; Benny Krestian Heriawanto
Unram Law Review Vol 9 No 2 (2025): Unram Law Review (ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v9i2.397

Abstract

Indonesian law has undergone several revisions. Still, with the various revisions, according to the author, it has not provided maximum legal protection and legal certainty to the parties involve in bankruptcy law itself, on the other hand, the Indonesian bankruptcy law regulation is more likely to favor the interests of creditors, can prove this that the bankruptcy law regulation in Indonesia does not require a minimum amount of receivables and does not regulate insolvency requirements. Regarding the lack of regulation of insolvency requirements in bankruptcy applications, this harms debtors who are still solvent as they can be filed for bankruptcy. There is a need for an insolvency test to determine whether the debtor is solvent or insolvent. With the implementation of the insolvency test the bankruptcy legal regime is appropriate because, under it only debtors who are genuinely unable to pay debts can be terminated by bankruptcy given the principle of insolvency. Therefore, implementing the insolvency test in bankruptcy law in Indonesian will provide legal certainty for debtors and protection to solvent debtors. In conducting this legal research, a normative juridical methodology was employed, drawing on statutory conceptual, and comparative approaches.