Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudentie Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Ach. Tahir, Ach.
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
MENGGALI MAKNA ASAS LEGALITAS DAN PERKEMBANGANNYA DI INDONESIA Tahir, Ach.
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2012): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (200.034 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v1i2.1358

Abstract

The principle of legality is a fundamental principle in the Criminal Code and the Islamic Criminal Law. The Bill of Criminal Code of Indonesia recognizes the principle of material legality (not absolutely applicable). Then, the consequences, in spite of not regulated in legislation, are that the person‘s acts are worth to be convicted. The person can be convicted as based on living law in the community. The principle of legality in the positive law could be abandoned on condition that the crime threatens public order and security. In Islamic Criminal Law, the principle of legality could also be abandoned on condition that the crime threatens public order and security.
Reevaluasi Hak-Hak dan Pembinaan Terhadap Narapidana Narkotika dalam Sistem Pemasyarakatan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Narkotika Kelas II A Yogyakarta Tahir, Ach.
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 50 No 1 (2016)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v50i1.176

Abstract

It is generally known that  the rights  of inmates have  been well  executed  by  the  Wirogunan  penitentiary  in  Yogyakarta.  Some caveats  need  to  be  evaluated  by  the  Ministry  of  Justice and  Human Rights especially Directorate General of Corrections, there are medical service, less availability of decent food, the high cost of prison canteen food,  unresponsive  response  to  gripe,  complicated  remission procedure.It  also  needs  to  be  considered  in  developing  inmates  that some inmates never be the member of correctional institution before, upgrading facilities, coaching personality and autonomy theinmates it self.
Restorative Justice in Rantau Prapat District Court for Oil Palm Theft Cases Prayetno, Dwi; Tahir, Ach.; Siregar, Andalan
Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): July-December 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57255/hakamain.v4i2.1472

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of restorative justice in resolving oil palm theft cases at the Rantau Prapat District Court, Indonesia. The research is grounded in the increasing application of restorative approaches within Indonesia’s criminal justice system, particularly following regulatory reforms encouraging diversion and mediation in minor property crimes. Employing a normative-empirical method, this study combines statutory analysis with field data derived from court decisions, interviews with legal practitioners, and relevant secondary literature. The objective is to evaluate how restorative justice principles—such as victim-offender dialogue, restitution, community involvement, and proportional accountability—are applied in practice and to assess their effectiveness in achieving substantive justice. The findings reveal that restorative justice mechanisms in oil palm theft cases prioritize compensation, reconciliation, and social harmony over punitive imprisonment. In several cases, settlement agreements facilitated by judges and prosecutors resulted in restitution payments and formal apologies, leading to case dismissal or reduced sentencing. This approach has contributed to reducing case backlogs and prison overcrowding while promoting community-based conflict resolution. However, challenges remain, including inconsistencies in procedural standards, limited institutional guidelines, and disparities in judicial discretion. Additionally, concerns arise regarding power imbalances between plantation companies and economically vulnerable defendants. The study concludes that restorative justice at the Rantau Prapat District Court reflects a progressive shift toward a more humanistic and efficient criminal justice model. Strengthening regulatory clarity, institutional capacity, and safeguards for vulnerable parties is essential to ensure fairness, transparency, and sustainability in the application of restorative justice for property-related offenses in Indonesia.
Challenges of Criminal Liability Related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Indonesia: Lessons from European Law Tahir, Ach.
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 12 No 2 (2025): Volume 12 Nomor 2 Desember 2025
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i2.63121

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the reasons why Indonesian criminal law has not yet recognized Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a subject of criminal liability and to examine relevant models of criminal responsibility when AI is involved in criminal acts. This research employs a normative legal method with a literature-based approach, analyzing legislation, criminal law doctrines, and international literature related to the development of AI regulation. The analysis shows that the difficulty in positioning AI as a legal subject stems from juridical, philosophical, and technical limitations within Indonesian criminal law. As a solution, when AI-related crimes occur, criminal liability may be attributed to programmers, manufacturers, users, or corporations based on their degree of functional control over the AI system. This approach is compared with the regulatory framework of the European Union through its AI Act, which serves as a normative benchmark as the first comprehensive and binding AI regulation addressing accountability in autonomous systems. The relevance of this comparison lies in its emphasis on control-based and risk-oriented responsibility, which reflects legal challenges similarly faced within the Indonesian legal system and aligns with the doctrines of functional control, corporate liability, vicarious liability, and risk management. The study concludes that Indonesia's current criminal law framework does not place AI as a subject of criminal law, thereby directing liability toward humans or corporations within the technology's control chain.
Co-Authors Prayetno, Dwi Siregar, Andalan