Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Penetrasi Fotovoltaik dengan Metode MILP dan Pertimbangan Pembebanan Minimal Teknis Alfi Bahar; Muhammad Yasirroni; Sarjiya; M. Isnaeni Bambang Setyonegoro
Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi Vol 12 No 1: Februari 2023
Publisher : Departemen Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jnteti.v12i1.4531

Abstract

Technological development and the reduction of installation costs have caused a rapid growth of solar power plants in Indonesia. The National Electricity Company (Perusahaan Listrik Negara, PLN) strives to achieve the energy mix of renewable energy to 23% by 2025. Solar power plants are unique in that they only supply their power during the daytime. It makes solar power plants connected to the power system change the load profile of the Java-Bali system. In this study, the penetration of solar power plants changed the scheduling of the Java-Bali system because the penetration was installed to the technical minimum loading of existing power plants. When penetration is too big, thermal generator scheduling failure is possible. Unit commitment and economic dispatch with mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) method using CPLEX and Python were carried out to calculate the fuel and generation costs per kWh before and after the penetration. MILP was used to solve the cost fuel equation, namely an integer and nonlinear mix equations, that are challenging to be solved using standar nonlinear programming methods. Due to the use of the MILP-UC, all objective function equations and restraint functions must be linear functions. The tests were conducted for three years, from 2023 to 2025. Simulation results on the Java-Bali system show that the capacity of solar power plants penetrating the Java-Bali system against the peak load will be 52%, 52%, and 50% in 2023, 2024, and 2025, respectively. Meanwhile, penetration of solar power plants to technical minimum loading of existing power plants resulted in the fuel cost falling by 23% in 2023 and 22% in 2024 and 2025. Lastly, the cost of generation per kWh will be decreased by 8% in 2023 and will be as low as 7% in 2024 and 2025.
Stochastic Unit Commitment dalam Berbagai Ukuran Sistem di bawah Ketidakpastian Peramalan PLTS yang Tinggi Muhammad Yasirroni; Lesnanto Multa Putranto; Sarjiya; Husni Rois Ali; Indra Triwibowo; Qiangqiang Xie
Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi Vol 12 No 1: Februari 2023
Publisher : Departemen Teknik Elektro dan Teknologi Informasi, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jnteti.v12i1.5281

Abstract

This paper proposes a stochastic unit commitment (SUC) approach to solve a day-ahead unit commitment (UC) problem in a system with high uncertainty net load which is caused by photovoltaic (PV) power plants. In contrast with robust unit commitment (RUC) which only considers the worst-case scenario, SUC considers every possible scenario with its probability. Multiple possible PV curves were obtained using k-means clustering on historical data. The proportion of cluster members was used as a weight factor representing the occurrence probability of PV curves. The test was separated into two-step tests, namely day-ahead and real-time markets, using IEEE 10 generating unit system and solved using CPLEX. The results showed that in a day-ahead UC, SUC ($539,896) had lower cost than RUC ($548,005). However, when the total energy generated was considered, the SUC (20.78 $/MWh) cost higher compared to RUC (20.75 $/MWh). It is because the solution proposed by SUC is as robust as the RUC, but the generation cost formulation also considers over-commitment. Thus, SUC produced a fairer price for the independent power producer and electric utility in the day-ahead calculation. The results also showed that in the test environment of the real-time market, SUC was able to produce a robust solution without going into over-commitment. It is clearly shown in a 30 units system test with 10 centroids, in which SUC had a cheaper solution (20.7253 $/MWh) compared to RUC (20.7285 $/MWh), without violating power balance or going to load shedding.