Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Education, Social Studies, And Management (IJESSM) Journal of Linguistics, Culture and Communication
Kisyani Laksono
Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Potential Topics as Discourse Shapers Argumentation The Forum Holds a Talk With the Theme of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Pragma-dialectical Studies Kamariah Kamariah; Kisyani Laksono; Agusniar Dian Savitri
International Journal Of Education, Social Studies, And Management (IJESSM) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): The International Journal of Education, Social Studies, and Management (IJESSM)
Publisher : LPPPIPublishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52121/ijessm.v3i1.131

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to find potential topics with dialectical objectives and potential topics with rhetorical objectives as argumentation makers at each stage of critical discussion at the COVID-19-themed talk forum. The method used is descriptive qualitative with data analysis techniques emphasizing pragma-dialectical studies focusing on argumentative discourse. Data analysis techniques emphasize pragma-dialectical studies focusing on argumentative discourse. The results showed that potential topics with dialectical and rhetorical functions were found at each stage of the argumentation. Each function found has a different role as an argumentative. Potential topics with an analytic function in the confrontation stage are used to explain the issues discussed. The opening stage ensures that disputes exist and are unambiguous. At the argumentation stage, it is used to test the acceptance of a descriptive, evaluative, or prescriptive point of view. The closing stage ensures that everything that has been said is concluded with sufficient evidence. At the same time, the potential topics with a rhetorical function in the confrontation stage are used to ensure that the issues in the discussion degree are helpful. In the opening stage, it is used to select arguments that do not involve the burden of proof. At the argumentation stage, it is used to apply persuasion tools that will make someone win the argument. The closing stage is used to ensure the argument ends.
Directive Speech Acts in Online Buying and Selling on Shopee: A Sociopragmatic Study Musaffak Musaffak; Kisyani Laksono; Mulyono Mulyono; Arif Setiawan
Journal of linguistics, culture and communication Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Journal of Linguistics, Culture, and Communication
Publisher : CV. Rustam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61320/jolcc.v4i1.239-254

Abstract

This study aims to describe the types, strategies, and sociopragmatic functions of directive speech acts in online buying and selling interactions on Shopee. This study employed a qualitative descriptive design supported by descriptive statistical tabulation and content analysis. The qualitative design was used to interpret the social meaning of utterances, while frequency and percentage were used to map the tendency of directive categories in the corpus. The data consisted of 156 directive speech acts taken proportionally from three communication channels: seller-buyer chat features, product reviews, and live promotions. Data classification was conducted using operational coding criteria for eight directive categories and strengthened through contextual checking and inter-coder discussion to maintain coding consistency. The analysis shows that the most dominant type is suggesting, with 45 data points (28.85%), followed by requesting 33 (21.15%), commanding 24 (15.38%), inviting 18 (11.54%), advising 14 (8.97%), prohibiting 9 (5.77%), permitting 7 (4.49%), and urging 6 (3.85%). Direct speech acts appear most frequently, with 92 data points (58.97%), followed by literal indirect speech acts 39 (25.00%) and non-literal indirect speech acts 25 (16.03%). Sociopragmatically, these frequencies serve as an entry point for interpreting power relations, politeness, and persuasion based on utterance context, speaker position, and channel characteristics. The use of “kak,” “mohon,” and familiarity markers is interpreted as a relational strategy that may support trust and rapport, although its direct effect on transaction success requires further empirical testing.
Co-Authors Agusniar Dian Savitri Arif Setiawan Kamariah Kamariah Mulyono Mulyono Musaffak Musaffak