<![CDATA[AbstractThis study reviews the implementation of the Constitutional Court Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 decision against children which born out of marriage in the controversy between Jessica Iskandar with Ludwig Franz Willibald in South Jakarta District Court.This study aims to determine the status of civil and inheritance rights of a child from Jessica Iskandar with Ludwig Franz Willibald, according to the Constitutional Court No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 decision. This study uses normative legal research which is using legislation and approach conceptual approach. The results obtained from this study is that Constitutional Courts decision only grants a judicial review of Article 43 paragraph (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage with Act of 1945. Such decision to reject or not to grant the petition for judicial review (judicial) Article 2 (2) of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, associated children outside marriage in the case of Jessica Iskandar. This was due to the Constitutional Court decision did not explain about natural child specifically, so in the case of Jessica Iskandarâs decision that his child still obtain a civil status by the biological father through DNA testing and also have rights to inheritance from his father.The writing approach which is used in this legal writing (thesis) is the laws approach and conceptual approaches.Keywords: Decision of the Constitutional Court, Children Outside of Marriage, The Rights of The ChildAbstrakPenelitian ini mengkaji tentang implementasi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 terhadap anak yang dilahirkan di luar perkawinan dalam putusan sengketa antara Jessica Iskandar dengan Ludwig Franz Willibald di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan, bertujuan untuk mengetahui status keperdataan dan hak waris anak dari Jessica Iskandar dengan Ludwig Franz Willibald menurut putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsetual. Adapun hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tersebut hanya mengabulkan uji materiil Pasal 43 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dengan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, akan tetapi menolak dan tidak mengabulkan permohonan uji materil (judicial review) Pasal 2 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, terkait anak diluar perkawinan dalam kasus Jessica Iskandar karena dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tidak dijelaskan secara spesifik tentang anak diluar perkawinan, sehingga dalam putusan kasus Jessica Iskandar anaknya tetap memperoleh status perdata dengan ayah biologisnya melalui tes DNA dan juga memiliki hak waris dari ayahnya.Kata Kunci: Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Anak di Luar Perkawinan, Hak Anak]]>
