Andriko Noto Susanto, Andriko Noto
Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Maluku Jl. Chr. Soplanit, Rumah Tiga, Ambon

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Spatial Variability of Soil Inherent Fertility Status at Irrigation Rice Field in Waeapo Plain, Buru Regency Susanto, Andriko Noto
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol 18, No 2: May 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i2.115-124

Abstract

Analysis and interpretation of spatial variability soils properties are a basis in site-specific nutrients management. Evaluation inherent potentiality (IP) of soil fertility status is the method to know variability of soil fertility and spatial distribution at the area. Evaluation of IP was conducted by mathematical calculation to eleven soil properties namely total C, total N, N-NH4+, total P, P-Bray 1, P (extract HCl 25%), [Ca+Mg]-exch., K-exch., CEC, available Si, and sand content. Result of IP evaluation in Waeapo plain indicated that from the total rice field area of 25,848.83 ha, 75.64% or 19,552.44 ha showed very low IP class, and the rest for the width of 6,296.39 ha or 24.36% had low IP class. Content of C-total, N-total, N-NH4+, P2O5 total, P2O5 extracted by HCl 25%, available P2O5 and Si was not limited IP, because they were all classified as moderate class. Limiting factor of very low and low IP was a combination of three elements of [Ca+Mg]-exch., K-exch, and CEC. Increasing CEC and availability of K with addition of ameliorant such as organic materials, calcite, zeolite and dolomite would improve IP status class.Keywords: Buru Island, inherent potentiality of soil fertility, rice, Waeapo Plain[How to Cite: Susanto AN and BH Sunarminto. 2013.Spatial Variability of Soil Inherent Fertility Status at Irrigation Rice Field in Waeapo Plain, Buru Regency. J Trop Soils 18 (2): 115-124. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.115][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.115] REFERENCESAl-Jabri M. 2008. Kajian metode penetapan kapasitas tukar kation zeolit sebagai pembenah tanah untuk lahan pertanian terdegradasi. J Standardisasi 10: 56-63  (in Indonesian). Davatgar N, Neishabouri MR, Sepaskhah AR. 2012. Delineation of site specific nutrient management zones for a paddy cultivated area based on soil fertility using fuzzy clustering. Geoderma 173: 111-118.Doberman A and T Fairhurst. 2000.  Rice: Nutrient disorders and nutrient management. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).  Philippines. 191p. Dobermann A, C Witt, S Abdulrachman, HC Gines, R Nagarajan, TT Son, PS Tan, GH Wang, NV Chien, VTK Thoa, CV Phung, P Stalin, P Muthukrishnan, V Ravi, M Babu, GC Simbahan and MAA Adviento. 2003. Soil fertility and indigenous nutrient supply in irrigated rice domains of asia.  Agron J 95: 913-923.Esington ME. 2003. Soil and Water Chemistry. An Integrative Approach. CRC Press. Boca Raton - Florida. 523p.Fairhurst T,  A Dobermann, AG Quijano and V Balasubramanian. 2007. Kahat dan Keracunan Mineral dalam  Padi: Panduan Praktis Pengelolaan Hara, In : Fairhurst, C. Witt, RJ. Buresh, and A. Dobermann (Eds.). International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI), and International Potash Institute (IPI). Diterjemahkan oleh Adi Wiyono. Badan Litbang Pertanian. Jakarta. 91p + A-46p  (in Indonesian).Haefele SM and MCS Wopereis. 2005. Spatial variability of indigenous supplies for N, P and K and its impact on fertilizer strategies for irrigated rice in West Africa. Plant  Soil 270: 57-72.Haefele SM, DE Johnson, S Diallo, MCS Wopereis and I Janin. 2000.  Improved soil fertility and weed management is profitable for irrigated rice farmers in the Sahel. Field Crops Res 66: 101-113.Hanudin E. 2000. Pedoman Analisis Kimia Tanah. Jurusan Tanah. Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta (in Indonesian).Hazelton P and B Murphy. 2007. Interpreting Soil Test Results. What Do All The Numbers Mean?. CSIRO Publishing.  Australia. 152p.Kyuma K. 2004. Paddy Soil Science. Kyoto University Press and Trans Pacific Press. 290p.  Mc Bratney AB and MJ Pringle. 1997. Spatial variability in soil-implication for precision agriculture. In: JV Stafford (ed.) Precision Agriculture ‘97. Vol. I. Bioss Scientific Publ. Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, pp.3-31.Meunier A.  2005. Clays. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Germany. 467p.N Davatgar, MR Neishabouri and AR Sepaskhah. 2012.  Delineation of site specific nutrient management zones for a paddy cultivated area based on soil fertility using fuzzy clustering. Geoderma 173-174: 111-118.Nguyen BV, DC Olk and KG Cassman. 2004.  Characterization of Humic Acid Fractions Improves Estimates of Nitrogen Mineralization Kinetics for Lowland Rice. Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68: 1266-1277.Poerwadi AD and A Masduqi. 2004. Penurunan Kadar Besi oleh Media Zeolit Alam Ponorogo Secara Kontinyu. JPurifikasi 5: 169-174  (in Indonesian).Prasetyo BH and RJ Gilkes. 1997. Properties of Kaolinit from Oxisol and Alfisols in West Java.  Agrivita  20: 220 - 227.Sirappa MP, AN Susanto, AJ Rieuwpassa, ED Waas and S Bustaman. 2005. Karakteristik, Jenis Tanah dan Penyebarannya Pada Wilayah Dataran Waeapo,  Pulau Buru. Agriplus  15(1): 20-32 (in Indonesian).Sulaeman, Suprapto dan Eviati. 2005. Analisis Kimia Tanah, Tanaman, Air  dan Pupuk. Edisi Pertama. Balai Penelitian Tanah. Bogor. 136p (in Indonesian).Syam T. 2010. Spatial Variability of Soil Nutrients Content Related to Rice Yield. J. Trop Soils  15: 153-157.Tan KH. 2003. Humic Matter in Soil and The Environment. Principles and Controversies. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York. 370p.Tan KH. 1993.  Principles of Soil Chemistry, 2nd ed. Marcel Deckker Inc., New York. 376p. Tesfahunegn GB, L Tamene and PLG Vlek. 2011.  Catchment-scale spatial variability of soil properties and implications on site-specific soil management in northern Ethiopia. Soil Till Res 117: 124-139.WEI, Yi-chang, You-lu BAI, Ji-yun JIN, Fang ZHANG, Li-ping ZHANG, Xiao-qiang LIU. 2009.  Spatial Variability of Soil Chemical Properties in the Reclaiming Marine Foreland to Yellow Sea of China.  Agric Sci China  8: 1103-1111.Witt C,  BT Yen, VM Quyet, TM Thu, JM Pasuquin, RJ Buresh and A Dobermann. 2007. Spatially Variable Soil Fertility in Intensive Cropping Areas of North Vietnam and Its Implications for Fertilizer Needs. Better Crops 91: 28-31.Yesrebi J, M Saffari, H Fathi, N Karimian, M Moazallahi and R Gazni. 2009. Evaluation and Comparison of Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting Methods for Prediction of Spatial Variability of Some Soil Chemical Parameters. Res  J Biol Sci 4:  93-102. Yoshida S. 1981. Fundamentals of  Rice Crop Science. IRRI. Los Banos, Philippines. 269p.
Land Suitability and Purposed Land Use of Selaru Island, West-Southeast Moluccas Regency Sirappa, Marthen Pasang; Waas, Edwin Donald; Susanto, Andriko Noto
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 15 No. 2: May 2010
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2010.v15i2.169-178

Abstract

Land Suitability and Purposed Land Use of Selaru Island, West-Southeast Moluccas Regency (MP Sirappa, ED Waas and AN Susanto): Research was conducted in Selaru Island, West Southeast Moluccas Regency which has areal 32,217 ha. The purpose of the research was to study land suitability class and directive of land use for developing food crop and estate plant. The results  indicated  that Selaru Island was suitable land (S) for upland rice, corn, peanuts, mungbean, sweet potato, calladium, and coconut which had areal of 28,312 ha, 19,330 ha, 19,330 ha, 19,330 ha, 19,330 ha, 28,312 ha, and 12,886 ha, respectively.  Land which was not suitable creteria (N) for upland rice, corn, peanuts, mungbean, sweet potato, calladium, coconut, and cacao were 3,905 ha, 12,887 ha, 12,887 ha, 12,887 ha, 12,887 ha, 3,905 ha, 19,331 ha, and 32,217 ha, respectively. Llimiting factors of land use for dryland food crop and estate plant in survey location were high temperature, root media (shallow soil solum), retention of nutrient (rather alkaline - until alkaline), medium erosion level and terrain (wavies, rock at soil surface and rock outcrop). Purposed  land use for food crop dyland and estate plant based on land suitability class were (1) public coconut estate with main commodity coconut in the areal of 1,947 ha, (2) food crop dryland-1 with main commodities corn, mungbean, purplish edible tuber, and calladium with a wide was 5,299 ha, (3) food crop dryland-2 with main commodities upland rice, purplish edible tuber, and calladium in the areal of was 8,982 ha, and (4) food crop dryland-3 with main commodities peanuts and mungbean in the areal of 14,031 ha
Spatial Variability of Soil Inherent Fertility Status at Irrigation Rice Field in Waeapo Plain, Buru Regency Susanto, Andriko Noto
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 18 No. 2: May 2013
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2013.v18i2.115-124

Abstract

Analysis and interpretation of spatial variability soils properties are a basis in site-specific nutrients management. Evaluation inherent potentiality (IP) of soil fertility status is the method to know variability of soil fertility and spatial distribution at the area. Evaluation of IP was conducted by mathematical calculation to eleven soil properties namely total C, total N, N-NH4+, total P, P-Bray 1, P (extract HCl 25%), [Ca+Mg]-exch., K-exch., CEC, available Si, and sand content. Result of IP evaluation in Waeapo plain indicated that from the total rice field area of 25,848.83 ha, 75.64% or 19,552.44 ha showed very low IP class, and the rest for the width of 6,296.39 ha or 24.36% had low IP class. Content of C-total, N-total, N-NH4+, P2O5 total, P2O5 extracted by HCl 25%, available P2O5 and Si was not limited IP, because they were all classified as moderate class. Limiting factor of very low and low IP was a combination of three elements of [Ca+Mg]-exch., K-exch, and CEC. Increasing CEC and availability of K with addition of ameliorant such as organic materials, calcite, zeolite and dolomite would improve IP status class.Keywords: Buru Island, inherent potentiality of soil fertility, rice, Waeapo Plain[How to Cite: Susanto AN and BH Sunarminto. 2013.Spatial Variability of Soil Inherent Fertility Status at Irrigation Rice Field in Waeapo Plain, Buru Regency. J Trop Soils 18 (2): 115-124. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.115][Permalink/DOI: www.dx.doi.org/10.5400/jts.2013.18.2.115] REFERENCESAl-Jabri M. 2008. Kajian metode penetapan kapasitas tukar kation zeolit sebagai pembenah tanah untuk lahan pertanian terdegradasi. J Standardisasi 10: 56-63  (in Indonesian). Davatgar N, Neishabouri MR, Sepaskhah AR. 2012. Delineation of site specific nutrient management zones for a paddy cultivated area based on soil fertility using fuzzy clustering. Geoderma 173: 111-118.Doberman A and T Fairhurst. 2000.  Rice: Nutrient disorders and nutrient management. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).  Philippines. 191p. Dobermann A, C Witt, S Abdulrachman, HC Gines, R Nagarajan, TT Son, PS Tan, GH Wang, NV Chien, VTK Thoa, CV Phung, P Stalin, P Muthukrishnan, V Ravi, M Babu, GC Simbahan and MAA Adviento. 2003. Soil fertility and indigenous nutrient supply in irrigated rice domains of asia.  Agron J 95: 913-923.Esington ME. 2003. Soil and Water Chemistry. An Integrative Approach. CRC Press. Boca Raton - Florida. 523p.Fairhurst T,  A Dobermann, AG Quijano and V Balasubramanian. 2007. Kahat dan Keracunan Mineral dalam  Padi: Panduan Praktis Pengelolaan Hara, In : Fairhurst, C. Witt, RJ. Buresh, and A. Dobermann (Eds.). International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI), and International Potash Institute (IPI). Diterjemahkan oleh Adi Wiyono. Badan Litbang Pertanian. Jakarta. 91p + A-46p  (in Indonesian).Haefele SM and MCS Wopereis. 2005. Spatial variability of indigenous supplies for N, P and K and its impact on fertilizer strategies for irrigated rice in West Africa. Plant  Soil 270: 57-72.Haefele SM, DE Johnson, S Diallo, MCS Wopereis and I Janin. 2000.  Improved soil fertility and weed management is profitable for irrigated rice farmers in the Sahel. Field Crops Res 66: 101-113.Hanudin E. 2000. Pedoman Analisis Kimia Tanah. Jurusan Tanah. Fakultas Pertanian. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta (in Indonesian).Hazelton P and B Murphy. 2007. Interpreting Soil Test Results. What Do All The Numbers Mean?. CSIRO Publishing.  Australia. 152p.Kyuma K. 2004. Paddy Soil Science. Kyoto University Press and Trans Pacific Press. 290p.  Mc Bratney AB and MJ Pringle. 1997. Spatial variability in soil-implication for precision agriculture. In: JV Stafford (ed.) Precision Agriculture ‘97. Vol. I. Bioss Scientific Publ. Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, pp.3-31.Meunier A.  2005. Clays. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Germany. 467p.N Davatgar, MR Neishabouri and AR Sepaskhah. 2012.  Delineation of site specific nutrient management zones for a paddy cultivated area based on soil fertility using fuzzy clustering. Geoderma 173-174: 111-118.Nguyen BV, DC Olk and KG Cassman. 2004.  Characterization of Humic Acid Fractions Improves Estimates of Nitrogen Mineralization Kinetics for Lowland Rice. Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68: 1266-1277.Poerwadi AD and A Masduqi. 2004. Penurunan Kadar Besi oleh Media Zeolit Alam Ponorogo Secara Kontinyu. JPurifikasi 5: 169-174  (in Indonesian).Prasetyo BH and RJ Gilkes. 1997. Properties of Kaolinit from Oxisol and Alfisols in West Java.  Agrivita  20: 220 - 227.Sirappa MP, AN Susanto, AJ Rieuwpassa, ED Waas and S Bustaman. 2005. Karakteristik, Jenis Tanah dan Penyebarannya Pada Wilayah Dataran Waeapo,  Pulau Buru. Agriplus  15(1): 20-32 (in Indonesian).Sulaeman, Suprapto dan Eviati. 2005. Analisis Kimia Tanah, Tanaman, Air  dan Pupuk. Edisi Pertama. Balai Penelitian Tanah. Bogor. 136p (in Indonesian).Syam T. 2010. Spatial Variability of Soil Nutrients Content Related to Rice Yield. J. Trop Soils  15: 153-157.Tan KH. 2003. Humic Matter in Soil and The Environment. Principles and Controversies. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York. 370p.Tan KH. 1993.  Principles of Soil Chemistry, 2nd ed. Marcel Deckker Inc., New York. 376p. Tesfahunegn GB, L Tamene and PLG Vlek. 2011.  Catchment-scale spatial variability of soil properties and implications on site-specific soil management in northern Ethiopia. Soil Till Res 117: 124-139.WEI, Yi-chang, You-lu BAI, Ji-yun JIN, Fang ZHANG, Li-ping ZHANG, Xiao-qiang LIU. 2009.  Spatial Variability of Soil Chemical Properties in the Reclaiming Marine Foreland to Yellow Sea of China.  Agric Sci China  8: 1103-1111.Witt C,  BT Yen, VM Quyet, TM Thu, JM Pasuquin, RJ Buresh and A Dobermann. 2007. Spatially Variable Soil Fertility in Intensive Cropping Areas of North Vietnam and Its Implications for Fertilizer Needs. Better Crops 91: 28-31.Yesrebi J, M Saffari, H Fathi, N Karimian, M Moazallahi and R Gazni. 2009. Evaluation and Comparison of Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting Methods for Prediction of Spatial Variability of Some Soil Chemical Parameters. Res  J Biol Sci 4:  93-102. Yoshida S. 1981. Fundamentals of  Rice Crop Science. IRRI. Los Banos, Philippines. 269p.
Assessment of Indigenous N, P and K Supply for Rice Site Specific Nutrient Management in Buru Regency Susanto, Andriko Noto; Sirappa, Marthen Pasang
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 19 No. 3: September 2014
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2014.v19i3.151-159

Abstract

Rate of fertilizer that should be applied to rice soil based on Site Specific Nutrient Management (SSNM) depends on indigenous nutrient supply, its recovery efficiency, and the amount of nutrients requirement to achieve the yield target. Research on nutrient omission plot was conducted in farmers irrigated land on Waeapo plain, Buru Island. In this area, N, P, and K were the main limiting factors of rice growth and yield. To overcome the constraint, this assessment was conducted to determine the indigenous supply of N, P and K and optimal target of rice productivity. Results of this assessment showed that  the average of rice optimum productivity (Mg grain water content/w.c. 14% ha-1)  in Waeapo plain was 6.55 Mg DGM (Dry Grain Milled) ha-1, with range from 5.6 to 7.3 Mg DGM ha-1 depended on the indigenous supply of  N, P and K. The average value of the indigenous N, P and K supplies in Waeapo plain  Buru was 65.59 kg N ha-1, 13.70 kg P ha-1 and 78.65 kg K ha-1, respectively while average productivity of rice on that indigenous N, P and K supplies was 5.05, 5.96 and 6.05Mg DGM ha-1, respectively. The value of indigenous nutrient supply of this nutrient can be used as a basis of fertilizer recommendation with the SSNM concept. Keywords: Indigenous nutrient supply; nitrogen; phosphorus; potassium; Site Specific Nutrient Management [How to Cite: Andriko NS and  MP Sirappa. 2014. Assessment of Indigenous N, P and K Supply for Rice Site Specific Nutrient Management in Buru Regency. J Trop Soils 19: 151-159. Doi: 10.5400/jts.2014.19.3.151]   
Land Suitability and Proposed Land Utilization of Selaru Island, West Southeast Moluccas Regency for Development Food Crops Sirappa, Marthen Pasang; Waas, Edwen Donald; Susanto, Andriko Noto
JOURNAL OF TROPICAL SOILS Vol. 21 No. 3: September 2016
Publisher : UNIVERSITY OF LAMPUNG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5400/jts.2016.v21i3.187-196

Abstract

The study was conducted in Selaru Island, West Southeast Moluccas Regency in an area of 32,217 ha. The research objective was to determine the land suitability and proposed land utilization of Selaru Island for development of food crops. The results showed that Selaru Island has a rather suitable (S2) and marginally suitable (S3) for six crops (upland rice, corn, peanuts, mungbeans, sweet potato, and caladium) covering an area of 19,330 ha and not suitable permanent (N2) for the six crops covering an area of 3,905 ha, while the area of 8,982 ha partly classified accordingly (S3) to plant upland rice and calladium and partially classified as not suitable (N1 and N2) for corn, peanuts, mungbeans, and sweet potatoes. The main limiting factor to the primary land use for food crops in Selaru Island, West Southeast Moluccas Regency among others are the temperatures (the average annual temperature is high), rooting medium (soil solum is shallow), nutrient retention (soil pH is rather alkaline to alkaline), erosion hazard level is moderate, and terrain (wave, rocks on the surface of the soil, and rock outcrop).The proposed land utilization of Selaru Island for food crops based on land suitability classes are (1) food crops of upland-1 with the main commodities of corn, mungbeans, uwi/kumbili and caladium an area of 5,299 ha, (2) food crops of upland-2 with the main commodities of upland rice, uwi/kumbili and caladium an area of 8,982 ha, and (3) food crops of upland-3 with the main commodities peanuts and mungbean an area of 14,031 ha. Development of food crops in Selaru Island need to consider the priority scale factor, the level of compliance, and social culture of the local community.Keywords: Food crops, land suitability, limiting factor, proposed land utilization, Selaru Island