Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Rule of Law Studies Journal
Abdain Abdain
Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Palopo
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENGELOLAAN ZAKAT PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM KONTEMPORER Abdain Abdain
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 13 No 1 (2015): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (770.959 KB) | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v13i1.361

Abstract

Islam provides guidance to its adherents who are facing the problem of social inequality by placing tithe as one of the main pillars of Islamic establishment, especially in anticipation of the growth of dynamics and economic equality in society. As a source of funds, tithe is potential to be used as capital for the construction of the Muslims, and it will be very effective in anticipating the social gap in the community. Classical scholars, generally categorize the subject to tithe is cattle, gold, silver, merchandise, property excavation, and agricultural products. Today, contemporary ijtihad, one of which is represented by the book of Yusuf Qardawi, specify wealth that is subject to tithe, as many models and forms of wealth that was born from the increasing of complexity of economic activities. Yusuf Qardawi divide tithe into nine categories: tithe of cattle, tithe of gold and silver which includes money, tithe of trade, tithe of agricultural output includes farmland, tithe of honey and animal production, tithe of minerals and marine products, tithe of plant investment, buildings and others, tithe of livelihood, tithe of services and professions, and tithe stocks and bonds.
Legal Review of Disputes Between Indigenous Communities and the Government Regarding Territorial Boundaries (Case Study of Marampa Village, Rongkong District, North Luwu Regency) Anggun Sari Sahid; Abdain Abdain; Anita Marwing
Rule of Law Studies Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Rule of Law Studies Journal
Publisher : CV. Dyoqu Publishing and Management

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64780/rolsj.v2i1.211

Abstract

Background:Disputes between indigenous communities and the government over territorial boundaries are a common occurrence in various regions across Indonesia. These conflicts are generally triggered by differing perspectives on determining territorial boundaries, with indigenous communities using a historical and traditional approach, while the government uses a formal administrative and mapping approach. Aims:This study aims to legally analyze the dispute between indigenous peoples and the government regarding territorial boundaries in Marampa Village, Rongkong District, North Luwu Regency, and to identify the factors causing the conflict and efforts to resolve it. Methods:This research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive design. The approach employed includes normative and historical juridical approaches. Data were obtained through observation, interviews, and documentation, involving indigenous communities and village government officials as research informants. The data were then analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. Result:The research results indicate that disputes between indigenous communities and the government regarding territorial boundaries are caused by differences in boundary determination methods, village expansion, lack of communication between indigenous communities and the government, and the government's lack of attention to the recognition of customary territories. Efforts to resolve the conflict are carried out through deliberation between the two parties and participatory mapping of customary territories. Conclusion: Boundary disputes between indigenous communities and the government are influenced by differing approaches to defining territory and a lack of coordination between the two parties. Therefore, more participatory policies and clearer legal recognition of indigenous territories are needed to minimize similar conflicts in the future.
Co-Authors Anggun Sari Sahid Anita Marwing