Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Gunung Djati Conference Series AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam
Mulyana
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Adab dan Ilmu dalam Pandangan Islam: Studi Takhrij dan Syarah Hadis Leddy Humaira Sakova; Hidayatul Fikra; Mulyana; Raden Roro Sri Rejeki Waluya Jati
Gunung Djati Conference Series Vol. 8 (2022): The 2nd Conference on Ushuluddin Studies
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (257.984 KB)

Abstract

This research aims to discuss hadiths about science and adab in the view of Islam, namely the hadith of Ibn Majah No. 220 through the application of takhrij and sharah hadith studies. This research method uses a qualitative approach through literature studies relating to contemporary analysis. The results of the study found that the hadith about science and adab is worth shahih in terms of sanad and matan. From this research can be concluded that science and adab are very important and interrelated, so God placed it as a noble and primary thing. It is also mentioned that high science does not mean if a person does not have fend, so is unable to behave and use his knowledge well. This research recommends further research related to the implementation of Ibn Majah's history hadith No. 220 on science and this adab with different methods and approaches.
A Comparative Study of al-Jarḩ wa al-Ta‘dīl in Ahl al-Sunnah and Shī‘ah Imāmiyyah Muhammad Azzam; Muhammad Akhyar; Muhammad Akbar Tanjung; Neni Nurlaela; Mulyana
AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): In Progress
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Jami Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69900/ag.v6i5.689

Abstract

The science of al-Jarḩ wa al-Ta‘dīl occupies a central position in hadith criticism as the primary instrument for evaluating the credibility of hadith narrators. Ahl al-Sunnah developed this discipline around the criteria of ‘adālah and ḍabṭ, while Shī‘ah Imāmiyyah developed a parallel discipline known as ‘Ilm al-Rijāl, which places strong emphasis on a narrator's loyalty to Ahl al-Bayt. This methodological divergence carries significant implications for the corpus of hadith accepted by each school, yet a focused comparative study of the two traditions remains limited. This study aims to compare the concepts, criteria, and epistemological foundations of al-Jarḩ wa al-Ta‘dīl in the Sunni tradition with ‘Ilm al-Rijāl in the Imāmī Shī‘ah tradition, and to examine how these methodological differences shape the acceptance of contested hadith such as the hadith of Ghadīr Khum and the hadith of the twelve caliphs. This research employs a qualitative library research design with a thematic (mawḍū‘ī) approach, a descriptive-analytical method, documentation as the data collection technique, and content analysis as the data analysis technique. Primary sources include Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, and classical rijāl literature from both traditions, supported by relevant secondary scholarship. The findings show that although both schools share the goal of safeguarding the authenticity of hadith and use comparable narrator classifications such as thiqah and ḍa‘īf, they differ fundamentally in their standards for evaluating the Companions, their sources of religious authority, and the resulting corpus of accepted hadith. These differences are not merely technical but reflect divergent paradigms in understanding religious authority and the transmission of Islamic teachings.
A Comparative Study of al-Jarḩ wa al-Ta‘dīl in Ahl al-Sunnah and Shī‘ah Imāmiyyah Muhammad Azzam; Muhammad Akhyar; Muhammad Akbar Tanjung; Neni Nurlaela; Mulyana
AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): In Progress
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Jami Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69900/ag.v6i5.689

Abstract

The science of al-Jarḩ wa al-Ta‘dīl occupies a central position in hadith criticism as the primary instrument for evaluating the credibility of hadith narrators. Ahl al-Sunnah developed this discipline around the criteria of ‘adālah and ḍabṭ, while Shī‘ah Imāmiyyah developed a parallel discipline known as ‘Ilm al-Rijāl, which places strong emphasis on a narrator's loyalty to Ahl al-Bayt. This methodological divergence carries significant implications for the corpus of hadith accepted by each school, yet a focused comparative study of the two traditions remains limited. This study aims to compare the concepts, criteria, and epistemological foundations of al-Jarḩ wa al-Ta‘dīl in the Sunni tradition with ‘Ilm al-Rijāl in the Imāmī Shī‘ah tradition, and to examine how these methodological differences shape the acceptance of contested hadith such as the hadith of Ghadīr Khum and the hadith of the twelve caliphs. This research employs a qualitative library research design with a thematic (mawḍū‘ī) approach, a descriptive-analytical method, documentation as the data collection technique, and content analysis as the data analysis technique. Primary sources include Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, and classical rijāl literature from both traditions, supported by relevant secondary scholarship. The findings show that although both schools share the goal of safeguarding the authenticity of hadith and use comparable narrator classifications such as thiqah and ḍa‘īf, they differ fundamentally in their standards for evaluating the Companions, their sources of religious authority, and the resulting corpus of accepted hadith. These differences are not merely technical but reflect divergent paradigms in understanding religious authority and the transmission of Islamic teachings.
Co-Authors Fikra, Hidayatul Leddy Humaira Sakova Muhammad Akbar Tanjung Muhammad Akhyar Muhammad Azzam Neni Nurlaela Raden Roro Sri Rejeki Waluya Jati