Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS PENDAPATAN USAHATANI BUNGA POTONG (Studi Kasus Petani Bunga Krisan Putih di Kelurahan Kakaskasen Dua Kecamatan Tomohon Utara Kota Tomohon) L. Pangemanan; G. Kapantow; M. Watung
AGRI-SOSIOEKONOMI Vol. 7 No. 2 (2011)
Publisher : Sam Ratulangi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (64.436 KB) | DOI: 10.35791/agrsosek.7.2.2011.86

Abstract

The study entitled "Income Analysis of Cut Flowers Farming (case study of White Chrysanthemumflower farmers at village of Kakaskasen Two, disctrict of North Tomohon)" was conducted to determinehow much farmers’ income from White Chrysanthemum flower farming in village of Kakaskasen Two,disctrict of North Tomohon and is expected to provide information to farmers about the number of farmers'income from White Chrysanthemum flower farming .The study lasted from October 2010 until December 2010 starting from data collecting up to preparationof the report. Areas of research conducted in the village of Kakaskasen Two, district of North Tomohon.The retrieved data are primary and secondary data. Primary data were obtained from 20 respondentsof White Chrysanthemum flower farmers, which is taken directly appoint (purposive sampling) and secondarydata obtained from the office of village of Kakaskasen Two. Income is calculated using the revenueanalysis. This analysis can also determine the level of farming efficiency which is calculated by dividingthe revenues and costs.Advantage of White Chrysanthemum flower farming compared to other farming is the use of land thatis not too large, on a narrow land, White Chrysanthemums flower can be developed. Other advantagescompared to other cut flowers is that White Chrysanthemum flower resistant to dust volcanic Mount Lokon.Chrysanthemum cultivation activities in the village of Kakaskasen Two is the main income source forfarmers to meet the needs of family farmers. This research shows that farmers’ income derived fromfarming of White Chrysanthemum flower is Rp11,132,146 by the efficiency is 4.43. In other words, farmingof White Chrysanthemum flower is profitable for farmers.
EFISIENSI PENGGUNAAN FAKTOR PRODUKSI PADA USAHATANI JAGUNG DI KECAMATAN REMBOKEN KABUPATEN MINAHASA (Studi Perbandingan Peserta dan Bukan Peserta Sekolah Lapang Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu) Carolina B.D. Pakasi; L. Pangemanan; Juliana R. Mandei; Nineteen N.I. Rompas
AGRI-SOSIOEKONOMI Vol. 7 No. 2 (2011)
Publisher : Sam Ratulangi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (129.226 KB) | DOI: 10.35791/agrsosek.7.2.2011.91

Abstract

The study was designed to analyze the efficiency of production factors between the program and whodo not follow SLPTT program. This study starts from November to December 2010. Data obtained fromprimary and secondary data. Primary data obtained from interviews using a questionnaire to cosumers.Sampling was done by using the method of Sampling Cluster, specifically 3 farmers groups program participantsSLPTT and 3 farmers group who are not participants SLPTT program. The analytical tool used is regressionanalysis Cobb-Douglas model using the program Minitab 15.Results showed that technically, the efficient use of production factors of land, urea fertilizer, seed, laborand herbicides by farmers SLPTT participants and not participants are the same. unless the use of fertilizersponska. Land use has not been efficient because of the percentage increase in corn production is higherthan the percentage increase in land (Ep> 1), the use of urea fertilizer and seed are efficient (0 <Ep <1)while the use of production factors labor and herbicides are not efficient because the additional factor ofproduction will reduce the production of maize (Ep <0). The use of factors of production of fertilizers byfarmers participating ponska SLPTT already efficient while the use of fertilizer by farmers rather than participantsSLPTT inefficient.Economically, the efficient use of production factors by both participants and non-participant farmersSLPTT is the same except for the use of fertilizers ponska. The use of production factors land, urea fertilizer,and seed has not been efficient, while the use of production factors labor and herbicides are not efficient.The use of factors of production of fertilizers by farmers participating Phonska SLPTT has not been efficientwhile the use of factors of production by non-participant farmers SLPTT inefficient.