Jaidun
Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Perpanjangan Masa Jabatan Kepala Desa Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Jaidun
Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Vol 1 No 02 (2022): Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (346.473 KB)

Abstract

Manusia pada hakekatnya ketika diberi kesempatan untuk berkuasa ingin terus berkuasa dan mempertahankan kekuasaan, bila perlu menggunakan segala macam cara, termasuk melakukan demonstrasi mendesak lembaga negara pemegang kekuasaan untuk melakukan perubahan terhadap rumusan norma dalam undang-undang. dalam rangka perpanjangan masa jabatan. Ribuan kepala desa menggelar unjuk rasa di depan Gedung Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR), di mana para kepala desa menuntut perpanjangan masa jabatan enam tahun sebelumnya menjadi sembilan tahun dan meminta Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) untuk mengubah rumusan norma yang mengatur masa jabatan kepala desa sebagaimana diatur dalam UU Desa. Keinginan kepala desa untuk memperpanjang masa jabatannya merupakan tindakan yang tidak biasa dalam sistem negara hukum dan demokrasi. Meskipun secara hukum dan politik perpanjangan masa jabatan kepala desa dapat dilakukan melalui musyawarah para pemangku kepentingan, namun hal tersebut tidak mencerminkan prinsip negara hukum dan kehidupan demokrasi.
Implikasi Hukum Terhadap Poligami Tanpa Izin dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Jaidun
Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Vol 2 No 05 (2023): Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jhhws.v2i05.304

Abstract

Memiliki istri lebih dari satu (poligami) merupakan dambaan bagi semua suami. Poligami dalam lembaga hukum Indonesia (UU Perkawinan) diperbolehkan, bahkan diberikan kesempatan kepada suami untuk menggunakan hak poligaminya secara terbatas, dengan syarat mutlak harus mendapat persetujuan tertulis atau tidak tertulis dari istri pertama. Jika pelaku poligami tetap melakukan poligami tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari istri pertama, maka dapat menimbulkan akibat hukum yaitu dapat dipidana penjara berdasarkan rumusan Pasal 279 dan Pasal 284 KUHP. Proses penanganan tindak pidana dimaksud harus berdasarkan laporan pengaduan dari istri pertama yang memiliki legal standing. Islam memperbolehkan suami untuk menikahi satu, dua, tiga atau empat wanita secara terbatas pada waktu yang bersamaan atau waktu yang berbeda dan tidak memerlukan persetujuan tertulis atau tidak tertulis dari istri pertama, selama suami yang berpoligami mampu untuk berpoligami dan mampu. mampu berlaku adil terhadap istrinya, adil yang dimaksud adalah adil dalam hal pemberian uang, makanan, minuman, pakaian dan perumahan yang layak dan adil dalam memberikan nafkah biologis sesuai dengan kemampuan suami.
KESIAPAN BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL KOTA SAMARINDA DALAM PENERBITAN SERTIFIKAT 1 (SATU) LEMBAR (MENURUT PERATURAN MENTERI AGRARIA DAN TATA RUANG / KEPALA BADAN PERTANAHAN NASIONAL NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG /BENTUK DAN ISI SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH) Muchamad Naufal Zakiy; Jaidun jaidun
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v10i2.354

Abstract

Human and land have a strong relations, very pure and undivided. It can be understood, because land is a home, provide food, birth place, buried place, and home of the ancestor. There are always a relations between human and land, society and a land. The constitution in 1945 article 33 clause 3 mention that earth, water and space with all its contents are controlled by nation and uses for public prosperity, that regulated in land laws are the gift of God almighty, based on rule right from the nation, so its become the government responsibility to perform land registration in all of territory of Republic Indonesia based on law number 5 year 1960 about basic rule of principles of agrarian that further mentioned in UUPA that individualistic, communal, religious, it aims to protect the land and manage the relation of land right through the certificate submission as a proof of land right for it owner. Article 4 clause 2 mention that certificate that mentioned in clause 1 is printed in one sheet based on information from physical and juridical data also equipped by owner’s photo. As one of society essential needs, land have an important roles in society lives. In the process of achieving the certificate, land registration process must be adjusted to law and technology development and society needs that regulated in Ministerial Regulation of Agrarian and Spatial / Head of National Land Agency number 7 year 2017 about shape and content of certificate of land right.
Peranan Advokat Dalam Pembelaan Hukum terhadap Terdakwa Korupsi di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pengadilan Negeri Samarinda (Tinjauan Etika Profesi Hukum) Jaidun Jaidun
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2019): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v11i2.522

Abstract

Smart and faithful people will never argue, that the State of the Republic of Indonesia is falling apart, debts mounting, to the point of reaching Rp. 4,000 (Four Thousand) Trillion is due to the crime of corruption that has taken root, curbed, thrived as if allowed to happen continuously. While law enforcement in this country does not provide a judicial verdict that has a deterrent effect for corruptors. It is difficult to understand in general, whether the legal verdict for corruption perpetrators by the Panel of Judges who hear and decide the case of corruption is influenced by the interference of fellow law enforcers ..., in this case, Advocates and Public Prosecutors (Prosecutors). Decisions of Corruption Courts often cause disparity in decisions, resulting in speculation from the public and assessing such decisions as being disproportionate and giving rise to public assumptions of a conspiracy between law enforcers, namely with several categories of interests, including: (1) The interests of the Prosecutor and Judges are in the interest of getting bribes (2) Advocates as law enforcers who accompany the defendant in defence of the interests of the accused by dirty and disgusting bribes. The role of advocates is very important in creating and maintaining a clean, authoritative and civilized justice system for the realization of the legal authority in this country.Thus, legal advocates must have faith and devotion to God strong and sturdy table and must dare to appear clean and first cleanse themselves from dirty thoughts in the midst of carrying out the legal profession, so that the noble profession is not polluted into contempt resulting from violation of legal norms and professional code of ethics by advocates. Based on the outputs achieved in this research program, namely the willingness and bottomlessness of the Advocates in defending the interests of the defendant must comply with the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations and uphold the Code of Ethics Procession.The analysis of this paper shows that lawyers have made a legal defence of corruption defendants in a professional manner in accordance with applicable legal provisions and upholds the code of ethics of the legal profession, even though there is also information about an advocate who is trying to bribe one of the Corruption Crimes judges in a case. which is being handled by the Advocate concerned. The description of the results of this survey is expected to be used as input and advice that can help realize the Court's decision which has a deterrent effect on corruptors and potential corruptors in the future.  
ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERDATA DIPENGADILAN Jaidun Jaidun; Syaharie Jaang
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 16 No. 2 (2024): Agustus
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v16i2.2997

Abstract

Settlement of civil disputes through a judge mediator is regulated in Article 1 paragraph (2) of the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation number 1 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Mediation in Court which states that a mediator is a Judge or other party who has a Mediator Certificate as a neutral party to assist the Parties in the negotiation process to seek various possibilities for resolving disputes without having to make a decision or force a resolution. The parties can use Alternative Dispute Resolution to reach a mutually beneficial agreement. The research used is non-doctrinal legal research, or can also be called research about law. The data used is primary data, namely data obtained directly from research subjects such as interviews. Apart from that, secondary data comes from statutory regulations and literature. Then the data obtained was analyzed qualitatively. The parties use the services of a certified mediator, because this is influenced by 2 factors, namely: (1) They do not want to pay the costs of hiring a certified mediator (2) There are no provisions governing the obligations of the parties to use a certified mediator. The failure of the peace agreement between the parties was caused by 2 factors, namely: (1) Having a strong desire to take the litigation route. (2) It is difficult to entrust the resolution of legal conflicts to a mediator. (3) Still holding a grudge that is difficult to reconcile. Mediators provide convenience and open access to information for the parties to achieve peace. Obstacles to peaceful efforts in court are (1) The parties have a strong desire to resolve civil conflicts through litigation (court). (2) The parties find it difficult to trust the mediator to resolve their conflict. (3) Both parties still hold grudges that are difficult to reconcile
Sosialisasi Pengawasan Pemilu yang Berkualitas untuk Melahirkan Pemimpin yang Berintegritas Jaidun
Jurnal Abdimas Mahakam Vol. 8 No. 01 (2024): Januari
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/jam.v8i01.2642

Abstract

Pengawasan pemilihan umum yang dilakukan oleh Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum beserta perangkat pengawas di tingkat desa dan kecamatan adalah untuk menjamin terselenggaranya pemilihan umum yang langsung, umum, jujur, bebas dan rahasia. Jika penyelenggaraan pemilu benar-benar dilaksanakan secara bebas, rahasia, jujur, adil, berkualitas dan demokratis, maka sudah barang tentu akan menghasilkan pemimpin bangsa yang berkualitas, berwibawa, transparan, kredibel dan berintegritas. Penyelenggaraan pemilihan umum memiliki keterkaitan yang erat dengan instrumen hukum sebagai alat pengaturan dalam rangka penguatan sistem demokrasi. Hukum dan demokrasi ibarat dua sisi mata uang yang saling membutuhkan dalam sebuah negara demokrasi. Tanpa instrumen hukum sulit untuk mewujudkan pemilu yang adil dan berintegritas. Instrumen hukum dapat mewujudkan keadilan dan integritas peserta pemilu, termasuk penyelenggara pemilu. Instrumen hukum menjamin konsistensi dalam pengaturan pemilu. Artinya, jika tidak ada konsistensi mengenai pengaturan pemilihan umum, maka akan berdampak buruk bagi penyelenggaraan pemilihan umum. Hal ini dapat dimanfaatkan oleh peserta dan penyelenggara pemilihan umum untuk melakukan kecurangan atau melanggar hukum dalam pemilihan umum. Instrumen hukum memberikan kepastian hukum dalam mencegah terjadinya kecurangan dalam pengaturan pemilihan umum. Instrumen hukum dapat menciptakan pemilihan umum yang efektif dan efisien.