Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.983
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Journal Evidence Of Law Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Corpus Juris : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Indah Riyanti
Universitas Jayabaya
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Hak -Hak Warga Negara Indonesia Bagi Anak Dalam Perkawinan Campuran Seumur Hidup Indah Riyanti
Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Vol 12 No 3 (2023): Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gresik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas kewarganegaraan ganda seumur hidup, relevansinya di Indonesia, dan masalah perlindungan hukum pada anak hasil perkawinan campuran. Berdasarkan Pasal 6 UU No. 12 Tahun 2006 tentang Kewarganegaraan, Indonesia menganut prinsip kewarganegaraan tunggal, sehingga kewarganegaraan ganda seumur hidup sulit diterapkan di Indonesia. Namun, kewarganegaraan ganda terbatas dapat diberlakukan pada anak hasil perkawinan campuran sampai usia 18 tahun yang kemudian dapat diperpanjang selama 3 tahun untuk menghindari terjadinya status tanpa kewarganegaraan. Masalahnya adalah Undang-Undang Kewarganegaraan tidak dapat melindungi hak asasi anak yang lahir dari suatu perkawinan campuran seperti status kewarganegaraan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan penelitian berupa pendekatan normatif dan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa negara wajib memenuhi serta melindungi hak warga negaranya, termasuk hak atas status kewarganegaraan anak hasil perkawinan campuran yang merupakan bagian yang tidak dapat terpisahkan dari konsepsi hak asasi manusia yang tertuang dalam konstitusi UUD NRI 1945. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan revisi Pasal 6 ayat (1) Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2006 tentang Kewarganegaraan agar hak sebagai warga negara Indonesianya bisa dilindungi seumur hidup. Diharapkan Lembaga Pemerintah seperti KBRI, Kemendagri, Dinas Kependudukan Pencatatan Sipil dan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM berintegrasi untuk saling mengkaji data antar instansi ketersediaan data dan dokumen, serta verifikasi status kewarganegaraan terkait perkawinan campuran untuk mempermudah proses pendaftaran serta pemberian fasilitas keimigrasian terhadap anak-anak perkawinan campuran yang ada di dalam dan di luar negeri. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi pada pemahaman konsep perlindungan hukum pada anak hasil perkawinan campuran dalam menjamin hak asasi manusia dimasa yang akan datang.
The Effects of Indonesia’s Membership in BRICS on Free Trade Policies and Legal Safeguards for Domestic Enterprises Indah Riyanti
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6058

Abstract

Indonesia's potential membership to BRICS, a coalition of prominent rising economies, presents substantial ramifications for international trade legislation and domestic regulatory structures. The research adopts a normative legal approach, employing statutory, conceptual, and comparative methodologies to examine primary legal sources, including international trade agreements, Indonesian trade regulations, and BRICS policies, alongside secondary sources such as academic articles and case studies. The principal findings indicate that Indonesia's participation in BRICS may augment its trade prospects by providing access to expansive markets and cooperative economic endeavours. Nonetheless, it presents obstacles, especially in harmonizing domestic trade regulations with BRICS' unified objectives and guaranteeing sufficient legal safeguards for local enterprises against heightened competition. The study concludes that Indonesia must strategically amend its trade legislation to reconcile international obligations with national interests, advocating for the creation of strong legal protections, enhancement of domestic enterprise capabilities, and proactive involvement in formulating BRICS trade policies to optimize advantages while minimizing risks. This paper enhances the discussion on the convergence of international trade law and domestic legal systems within the framework of growing economic alliances.
Desentralisasi dan Hubungan Pusat-Daerah dalam Negara Kesatuan: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia Indah Riyanti
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1717

Abstract

Desentralisasi merupakan salah satu mekanisme utama dalam pengelolaan negara kesatuan untuk menjaga keseimbangan antara stabilitas nasional dan kebutuhan otonomi lokal. Indonesia dan Jepang, meskipun sama-sama negara kesatuan, menerapkan model desentralisasi yang berbeda dengan latar belakang historis, politik, dan budaya yang khas. Artikel ini bertujuan membandingkan pola hubungan pusat–daerah di Indonesia dan Jepang dengan menekankan aspek regulasi, struktur pemerintahan, dan mekanisme fiskal. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi literatur dengan pendekatan komparatif. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia menekankan desentralisasi politik dan administratif melalui pemberian kewenangan luas kepada daerah, sementara Jepang lebih menekankan efisiensi dan stabilitas fiskal dalam kerangka local autonomy law. Studi ini menegaskan bahwa keberhasilan desentralisasi tidak hanya ditentukan oleh peraturan hukum, tetapi juga kapasitas birokrasi, budaya politik, dan konsistensi pengawasan pusat.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM LELANG EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN DENGAN PENETAPAN NILAI LIMIT YANG TIDAK PROPORSIONAL Nico Natanael Simanjuntak; Khalimi Khalimi; Indah Riyanti
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v2i2.2906

Abstract

Article 6 of the Mortgage Law grants authority to the first Mortgage Holder to sell the collateral object through a public auction if the debtor defaults. This provision is further complemented by Article 55 paragraph (1) and Article 57 of the Minister of Finance Regulation Number 122 of 2023, which regulate the obligation to determine a Limit Value and the use of an appraisal report as the basis for its determination. However, in practice, there are still instances where Limit Values are determined in an objective and disproportionate manner. Therefore, this research examines the regulation of Limit Value determination and the legal certainty of Mortgage execution auctions where the Limit Value is not based on objective and proportional standards. This research employs the Legal Certainty Theory by Jan Michiel Otto and the Theory of Property Rights by Mariam Darus Badrulzaman. The research method used is normative juridical research, utilizing library-based legal materials or secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The research approaches applied include the statutory approach, conceptual approach, analytical approach, and case approach. The legal materials were collected by identifying and inventorying positive legal regulations, books, journals, and other relevant legal sources. The analysis of legal materials was conducted through systematic and grammatical interpretation as well as analogical construction. The results of the research indicate that the regulation of Limit Value determination in Mortgage execution auctions based on the Mortgage Law and Minister of Finance Regulation Number 122 of 2023 has provided a legal basis for the Seller’s authority to determine the Limit Value based on appraisal or assessment results. However, these regulations have not yet provided clear and uniform standards regarding the limits of reasonableness and proportionality of the Limit Value, resulting in discretionary space that may cause differences in legal application in practice. The implementation of auctions with Limit Values that are not objective and proportional has not provided legal certainty for the parties, as it may result in losses to the economic value of the collateral object. The determination of a Limit Value that does not comply with the principles of objectivity, fairness, prudence, and good faith may be qualified as an unlawful act, resulting in the auction being declared invalid and creating an obligation to restore the debtor’s rights over the collateral object.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMBELI YANG BERITIKAD BAIK ATAS PEMBATALAN PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI SECARA SEPIHAK Fadly Amnar Yanto; Khalimi Khalimi; Indah Riyanti
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 8 (2026): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v3i8.2963

Abstract

Article 1338 of the Indonesian Civil Code provides that a legally valid agreement is binding upon the parties as law and must be performed in good faith, while Article 1266 provides that the cancellation of a reciprocal agreement must be sought before a judge. However, in practice, unilateral cancellation of Sale and Purchase Preliminary Agreements (Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli or PPJB) that prejudices good-faith buyers still occurs. This research examines the legal consequences for sellers arising from unilateral cancellation of PPJB and the forms of legal protection afforded to good-faith buyers. The theories employed are R. Soeroso’s theory of legal consequences and Satjipto Rahardjo’s theory of legal protection.This research employs a normative juridical method based on library research and secondary legal materials consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The research approaches used are statutory, conceptual, analytical, and case approaches. Legal materials were collected by identifying and inventorying positive legal provisions, books, journals, and other relevant legal sources. The legal materials were analyzed using systematic and grammatical interpretation as well as analogical construction. The results show that the legal consequences for sellers arising from unilateral cancellation of a PPJB are determined by the legal basis for cancellation, fulfillment of contractual obligations, the buyer’s good faith, and the cancellation procedure. Unilateral cancellation without a valid legal basis against a good-faith buyer may constitute an unlawful act, resulting in obligations to restore the contractual relationship, return payments, and/or provide compensation. Conversely, cancellation is valid where the buyer is proven to have committed a breach of contract and the cancellation is carried out in accordance with the PPJB. Legal protection for good-faith buyers is provided through restoration of their rights, including declaring the cancellation invalid, ordering the continuation of the PPJB, restoring the buyer’s rights to the object, returning payments, and awarding proven damages. Such protection is based on the buyer’s good faith and fulfillment of contractual obligations, thereby providing concrete restoration of rights prejudiced by an unlawful cancellation
Co-Authors Fadly Amnar Yanto Khalimi Khalimi Nico Natanael Simanjuntak