Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Cantika W Muhrim
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pattimura, Ambon
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Terhadap Kesaksian Yang Meringankan Dalam Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Cantika W Muhrim; Sherly Adam; Elias Zadrach Leasa
TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 10 (2022): Volume 2 Nomor 10, Desember 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law Pattimura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/tatohi.v2i10.1442

Abstract

Introduction: The judge's legal considerations are one aspect of realizing the value of a judge's decision that contains justice and contains legal certainty. In deciding a case the judge must consider the juridical, sociological and philosophical truths.Purposes of the Research: Analyze and discuss the judges legal considerations against the mitigating testimony based on the decision of the district cour No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”. analyze and discuss the imposition of sanctions against the crime of rapoe based on decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb)”. Methods of the Research: This research uses the juridical normative method by using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach.Results of the Research: The results showed that the judge’s leal considerations in the decision No. 396/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Amb resulted in the defendant bein acquitted because of the weak evidence presented by the public prosecutor, namely there were no eye witnesses, expert witnesses and also Visum et Repertum which were not used as evidence. On the other hand, the defendant has a mitigating witness, where mitigating facts greatly influence the judgge in imposing sancsions. Based on this decision the judge that the intercourse was consesual, so the judge handed down an acquittal against the defendant.
Co-Authors Elias Zadrach Leasa Sherly Adam