Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal WAJAH HUKUM Journal of Innovative and Creativity
Usak Usak
Universitas Halmahera
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kepastian Hukum Kekuatan Eksekutorial Sertipikat Hak Tanggungan Elektronik (Studi Peraturan Menteri ATR/KBPN Nomor 5 Tahun 2020) Usak Usak
Wajah Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2023): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v7i1.1045

Abstract

The National Land Agency may now provide their dependents access to online services thanks to Ministerial Regulation No. 5 of 2020 from ATR/KBPN. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the progress made toward implementing the requirements of ATR/KBPN ministerial order Number 5 of 2020, namely the Electronic Dependent Rights Certificate and the mechanisms for electronic inheritance of Dependent Rights. The norms of the law are observed in this kind of investigation. According to the findings, ATR/KBPN Regulation No. 5 of 2020 governs the procedure for adding dependents to the Electronic Dependent Rights System. Neither UUHT nor Permen ATR/KBPN No. 5 of 2020 prohibits the use of EDRs. It is the author's contention that, as Electronic Dependent Rights do not have any kind of inherent priority, Article 54 of the ITE Law prohibits their use as executory proof. The Electronic Dependent Rights Certificate does not provide any further clarity or legal protection for creditors and borrowers.
Kepailitan Akibat Pembatalan Pengesahan Rencana Perdamaian (Homologasi) Oleh Kreditor Separatis (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 177 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021): Kepailitan Akibat Pembatalan Pengesahan Rencana Perdamaian (Homologasi) Oleh Kreditor Separatis (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung No 177 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021) Usak Usak
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i2.2757

Abstract

In the case of PT Mopoli Raya, the Commercial Court at the Medan District Court issued a decision to ratify the Peace Agreement between PT Mopoli Raya (in PKPU) and its Creditors with Decision Number 17/Pdt.Sus-PKPU-Pengesahan Perdamaian/2020/PN Niaga Mdn, because it was deemed to have fulfilled the quorum as a condition for accepting the peace as regulated in Article 281 paragraph (1) letter b of Law Number 37 of 2004. However, PT Bank Maybank Indonesia Tbk, as a separatist creditor, considered that the ratification of the peace plan had not met the requirements and then filed an appeal. The purpose of this study is to examine the position of separatist creditors in the ratification of the peace plan and to analyze whether the Supreme Court Decision No. 177 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021 is in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 37 of 2004. The research method used in this study is the normative juridical method with a case approach. This study found that Law Number 37 of 2004 regulates the status of secured creditors in determining a reconciliation plan within the framework of a PKPU (Deferred Payment for Debt Obligations). One of these provisions is that secured creditors who disagree with the ratification of the reconciliation plan can file an appeal. Supreme Court Decision No. 177 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021 overturned the Commercial Court Decision at the Medan District Court, resulting in PT Mopoli Raya being declared bankrupt, in accordance with Law Number 37 of 2004.
Co-Authors