Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kosmik Hukum QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Journal Customary Law
Triwanto Triwanto
Universitas Slamet Riyadi
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Review of the Execution of Mortgage Rights on Land (Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 10/PUU-XIX/2021) Triwanto Triwanto; Puspaningrum Puspaningrum; Dita Sari
Journal Customary Law Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): September
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/jcl.v2i4.4743

Abstract

The execution of mortgage rights on land is a crucial element in the property security legal system in Indonesia, which allows creditors to obtain debt repayment if the debtor defaults. However, the implementation of parate executie as a non-litigious mechanism based on Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights has sparked constitutional debates, particularly regarding the debtor's right to fair legal protection. This study analyzes the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court in Decision No. 10/PUU-XIX/2021, which rejected the constitutional review of the mortgage execution norms, and evaluates the legal execution procedures post-decision. Using the normative legal research method, this article examines the approach of contractual freedom, the principle of justice, and the protection of property rights in the context of creditor-debtor relationships. The study results show that the Court views parate executie as constitutionally valid, as long as it is carried out with the principles of transparency, proportionality, and the availability of legal recourse for the debtor. Therefore, legal protection within the mortgage system is not eliminated, but must be implemented through accountable and just practices. These findings provide an important normative basis for policymakers and economic actors in ensuring that the execution of guarantees runs effectively while still upholding the constitutional rights of the parties involved.
Penegakan Hukum Terkait Lingkungan Hidup Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Triwanto Triwanto; Puspaningrum Puspaningrum; Ester Saur Maulina Sinaga
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7019

Abstract

Lingkungan hidup di Indonesia menghadapi ancaman serius akibat eksploitasi sumber daya alam, pencemaran, dan lemahnya pengawasan. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup hadir sebagai instrumen hukum utama dalam menjaga kelestarian lingkungan, namun implementasinya di tingkat masyarakat masih menghadapi berbagai kendala. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman warga desa mengenai hak, kewajiban, serta peran mereka dalam mendukung penegakan hukum lingkungan hidup. Metode pelaksanaan dilakukan melalui ceramah, diskusi interaktif, serta pre-test dan post-test untuk mengukur peningkatan pemahaman peserta. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan signifikan dalam pengetahuan masyarakat tentang substansi UU No. 32/2009, khususnya prinsip kehati-hatian, partisipasi publik, dan tanggung jawab kolektif. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa edukasi hukum berbasis partisipatif efektif dalam memperkuat kesadaran hukum sekaligus mendorong partisipasi masyarakat dalam menjaga kelestarian lingkungan hidup.
State Accountability and the Problem of Citizen Lawsuit Execution Triwanto Triwanto; Imam Al Ghozali Hide Wulakada
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 26 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v26i2.29553

Abstract

This article examines state accountability and the weak execution of Citizen Lawsuit decisions in Indonesia’s public service context. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study analyzes constitutional and legislative obligations regarding public services and road infrastructure, as well as their enforcement through Citizen Lawsuits. The findings show structural and normative problems: ambiguity of legal forum (civil or administrative courts), absence of clear execution norms, and predominantly declaratory judgments without coercive mechanisms. These weaknesses create a gap between formal recognition of state negligence and the actual restoration of citizens’ rights. Comparative insights from the United States, India, and theoretical discussions on the rule of law and anti-corruption indicate that effective enforcement design is crucial to strengthening public trust and accountability. The article proposes reform of legal norms, procedures, and institutional coordination to ensure that Citizen Lawsuit decisions are executable and provide substantive protection.
Co-Authors Dita Sari Ester Saur Maulina Sinaga Imam Al Ghozali Hide Wulakada Puspaningrum -