Agus Juara
Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science, Universitas Sains Al-Qur’an

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of the Precast Half Slab Method in Batang I Industrial Workers Flats Development Project Iqbal Muttaqin; Nasyiin Faqih; Agus Juara
Civilla : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Islam Lamongan Vol 8 No 1 (2023): MARCH
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/cvl.v8i1.1003

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of Precast Half Slab formwork with conventional formwork in terms of cost, time, and implementation stages. The method used in this study is the precast half slab method. The Batang I Industrial Worker Flats project is in the Batang Integrated Industrial Estate. In the highly advanced construction era, many projects compete to innovate to produce a fast and efficient building. This Project uses the precast half slab method, where half of the floor slab is printed offsite (precast) with a thickness of 7 cm, and the other half is in place (topping 5.5 cm). This final Project analyzes the precast half slab method used by comparing it to the conventional method in terms of cost and time, so it can be seen which method is more profitable. The precast half-slab method analysis focuses on calculating the direct cost of conventional half-slab precast in terms of materials, tools, and worker wages, as well as calculating the time needed for each job.
Comparison of Structure Design Between Bored Pile Foundations and Pile Foundations (Case Study: Industrial Worker I Batang Flower House Construction Project) M Iqbal Surya Negara; Nasyiin Faqih; Agus Juara
Civilla : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Islam Lamongan Vol 8 No 1 (2023): MARCH
Publisher : Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Islam Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30736/cvl.v8i1.1028

Abstract

Field surveys and laboratories found dense soil layers up to a depth of 14 m, so an alternative to drilled pile or pile foundations was used. This study aims to compare the pile and drilled pile foundation plans with the same soil data, loads, and dimensions. Analysis by calculating the pile foundation plan compared to the drilled pile foundation so that the planning results are obtained, soil bearing capacity, pile group efficiency, number of piles and drilled piles, RAB (budget plan), and drilled pile plans. Compared to 50cm square piles and 40×40cm square piles, the bearing capacity of a single pile (Qult) is 44.5 tons, and the bored pile foundation is 54.72 tons. The pile resistance (f) is 38.79 tons for piles with a diameter of 40 x 40 cm and 38.79 tons for drilled piles with a diameter of 50 cm. One pile's allowable pressure-bearing capacity (Pa) is 14.48 tons, and one drilled pile is 17.48 tons. The permissible tensile strength (Pta) for one pile is 11.64 tons, and for one drilled pile is 14.46 tons. The pile foundation requires 263 piles, and the bored pile foundation requires 258 piles.