Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Konsep dan Implementasi Kaidah Fiqhiyah Tentang Syirkah (Studi di Koperasi Syariah Baitul Mu’min Ujung-Berung Bandung) Ai Imas Mursyidah Zein; Fauzan Januri
Rayah Al-Islam Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Rayah Al Islam April 2023
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Bahasa Arab Ar Raayah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37274/rais.v7i1.674

Abstract

Kaidah merupakan hukum yang bertabiat universal (kulli) yang mencakup segala bagian- bagiannya(juz`i) dimana hukum yang juz`i itu menjadi bagian dari hukum yang universal ataupun kulli. Ranah kajian mangulas kaidah yang terpaut dengan kaidah fiqhiyah furu’ yang tercantum kedalam dawâbith fiqhiyyah ataupun kaidah fiqih spesial yang mangulas satu bab saja ialah terpaut muamalah ataupun tepatnya berkenaan dengan perkara syirkah. Sejatinya ketetapan hukum syirkah merupakan akad yang diperbolehkan syariat. Namun, ada beberapa ketentuan mekanisme akad syirkah ini berbeda-beda ada syrkah yang dianggap tidak diperbolehkan atau batal ada juga syirkah yang ditetapkan kebolehannya oleh syariat Islam. Salah satu syirkah yang diperbolehkan adalah mudharabah. Salah satu lembaga keuangan syariah yang mempraktikannya adalah Koperasi Syariah Baitul Mu’min Ujung Berung. Ketetapan syirkah mudharabah ini telah ditetapkan sebagai salah satu syirkah yang diperbolehkan syariat Islam. The rule is a universal law (kulli) which includes all its parts (juz`i) where the juz`i law becomes part of a universal law or kulli. The area of study dealing with principles related to the rules of fiqhiyah furu' included in the dawâbith fiqhiyyah or special fiqh rules that cover only one chapter is related to muamalah or to be precise with regard to syirkah matters. In fact, the stipulations of syirkah law are contracts that are permitted by shari'a. However, there are several provisions on the mechanism of this syirkah contract, which vary, there are syirkah which are considered prohibited or canceled, and there are also syirkah whose permissibility is determined by Islamic law. One of the permissible syirkah is mudharabah. One of the Islamic financial institutions that practice this is the Baitul Mu'min Ujung Berung Sharia Cooperative. This syirkah mudharabah provision has been determined as one of the syirkahs permitted by Islamic law.
Akad Salam dan Wakalah Dalam Jual Beli Dropshipping Menurut Kaidah Fikih Ekonomi Dian Ikha Pramayanti; Fauzan Januri
Rayah Al-Islam Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Rayah Al Islam April 2023
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Bahasa Arab Ar Raayah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37274/rais.v7i1.681

Abstract

Kegiatan ekonomi saat ini sudah mulai berkembang dan bertransformasi ke digitalisasi. Sehingga perlu sinkronisasi antar syariat Islam yang ada di dalam Al-Qur’an dan Hadis. Apakah hukum dalam Al-Qur’an dan hadis masih relevan dengan kegiatan muamalah saat ini yang serba digital karena sangat diperlukan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan dan hajat manusia di muka bumi.Dari beberapa review literatur secara qawaid fhiqiyah, bahwa jual beli dengan sistem dropshipping memiliki kesamaan dengan jual beli yang menggunakan akad salam (akad salam paralel) dan akad wakalah. Ke dua akad tersebut saling berkaitan dalam jual beli dengan sistem dropshipping. Dan jual beli dengan sistem dropshipping ini diperbolehkan dalam agama Islam. Yaitu pada akad salam yang mana terjadi dalam perkara kepemilikan dan keberadaan barang yang akan dijual. Dalam sistem dropshipping, penjual (dropshipper) tidak memilik dan tidak ada barang (keberadaan barang) di sisinya. Saat akad wakalah juga ada “celah” tidak sesuai syariah. Bahwa syarat wakalah adalah harga atau keuntungan penjualan adalah dalam tanggungan supplier (muwakkil). Namun, pada praktiknya dropshipper bisa menentukan harga dan pengambilan keuntungan tanpa ada kesepakatan di awal dengan supplier. Currently, economic activity has begun to develop and transform into digitalization. So it is necessary to synchronize between Islamic law in the Al-Qur'an and Hadith. Are the laws in the Qur'an and hadith still relevant to today's all-digital muamalah activities because they are very much needed to meet the needs and desires of humans on earth.From several qawaid fhiqiyah literature reviews, that buying and selling with a dropshipping system has similarities to buying and selling using a salam contract (parallel salam contract) and a wakalah contract. The two contracts are interrelated in buying and selling with a dropshipping system. And buying and selling with the dropshipping system is permissible in Islam. Namely in the salam contract which occurs in cases of ownership and existence of the goods to be sold. In the dropshipping system, the seller (dropshipper) does not own and there are no goods (existence of goods) on his side. When the wakalah contract also has "loopholes" that are not in accordance with sharia. Whereas the wakalah requirement is that the price or sales profit is in the hands of the supplier (muwakkil). However, in practice, dropshippers can determine prices and take profits without prior agreement with suppliers.
Studi Komparasi Sistem Garansi Menurut Hukum Ekonomi Syariah dan Hukum Perdata Siti Nuranisya; Fauzan Januri
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : SPT. haria Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v4i2.1848

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the comparative system of warranty in Islamic Economic Law (specifically the concept of khiyār ‘aib) and the warranty system in Civil Law (KUHPerdata). The main focus of this study is to identify points of convergence, divergence, and the juridical implications of these two legal instruments in protecting consumers from defective products. The research method used is normative legal research with a comparative approach. The results indicate fundamental similarities regarding the buyer's right to rescind or proceed with the transaction if a defect is discovered, as well as the seller's obligation to be responsible for latent defects. However, there are significant differences in determining the warranty period and the criteria for claimable defects. In terms of juridical implications, these differences lie in the legal subjects, the scope of the objects, and the nature of the contracts used. The study concludes that although khiyār and warranty have different philosophical foundations, they share the same goal of ensuring justice and protection for parties involved in sales transactions.
Perbandingan Fikih Tentang Konsep Harta dalam Islam (Studi Komparatif Empat Mazhab dan Aplikasinya pada Harta Kontemporer) Asnan Purba; Ayi Yunus Rusyana; Fauzan Januri
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : SPT. haria Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v4i2.2013

Abstract

This study examines the concept of property (al māl) through the lens of the four schools of Islamic jurisprudence Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali as a legal discipline oriented toward determining the validity or invalidity (al ḥukm) of a practice within mu'āmalah māliyyah. Unlike exegetical studies preoccupied with the meaning of verses, this article concentrates on the formulation of rulings (al aḥkām) and legal maxims (al qawāʻid al fiqhiyyah) concerning the definition, criteria, and legal consequences of property. The research employs a qualitative normative legal approach grounded in a literature review, selecting opinions according to the mu'tabar or al muʻtamad (authoritative) criterion within each school. The data are analysed through comparative (muqāranah) and conceptual techniques by constructing five evaluative markers: taʻyīn, qīmah, qabḍ, manfaʻah mubāḥah, and ḍamān. The findings reveal that the four schools differ in emphasis, whose roots can be traced to their respective uṣūl al fiqh methodologies, yet such differences can be woven into a single operational evaluative framework applicable to various contemporary forms of property, ranging from digital assets and cryptocurrencies to intellectual property rights and modern Islamic financial instruments. The study concludes that the classical fiqh framework remains relevant and flexible as long as its foundational maxims are applied consistently and supported by the rulings of contemporary fatwa institutions.