Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Handling and Enforcement of Illegal Fishing Laws in Indonesia Based on Law Number 45 of 2009 Concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 2004 Concerning Fisheries Josept Prayego Matondang; Abdul Hakim; Maya Jannah
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i4.808

Abstract

Illegal fishing practices are national in nature which are still difficult to prevent in Indonesian waters and international glass and have not been able to be eradicated without international cooperation. A number of international agreements and cooperation in the field of international law of the sea and fisheries as well as international criminal have not been able to categorize illegal fishing as an international crime. This article discusses related regulations on illegal fishing according to Indonesian national law and examines the urgency of tackling illegal fishing as a crime that is still always discussed nationally and internationally. This article is a normative legal research with a statutory approach that traces relevant national legal instruments until they are analyzed by descriptive methods. The results of the study show that illegal fishing has been regulated firmly and well in Indonesian laws and regulations. Illegal fishing is a crime that has characteristics across national borders. In terms of the implementation of Indonesia's national law, until now there seems to be no coordination between the central government and local governments in establishing a mechanism related to prevention efforts.
Analysis of Criminal Convictions of Perpetrators of Unpleasant Acts Cipta Hatimbulan T; Maya Jannah; Abdul Hakim
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i4.813

Abstract

This study aims to find out and analyze the criminal punishment of perpetrators of unpleasant acts. As well as knowing and analyzing the analysis of criminal convictions against perpetrators of unpleasant acts (decision study number: 386 / pid.b / 2013 / pn.rhl). This research is a type of normative research so it can be known that this article can become a rubber article if there is no measure of the extent to which the insult judgment can occur. So the measure is very subjective and based only on the assessment of victims, investigators, and public prosecutors alone.
Gratification of Ticketing and Accommodation Facilities by the Former Deputy Chairman of the Kpk Reviewed Law Number 19 of 2019 Concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 Concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission Brian Rommy Sitorus; Abdul Hakim; Maya Jannah
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i4.822

Abstract

Not enough with one ethical violation, KPK leader Lili Pintauli again acted and again dealt with the KPK Supervisory Board (Dewas) over the alleged receipt of gratuities in the form of hotel accommodation to tickets to watch the Mandalika MotoGP. This study aims to find out and analyze the regulation of gratification as one of the criminal acts of corruption. And knowing and analyzing about gratification can be classified as a criminal act of bribery corruption. This research belongs to the normative type of research. So it can be known that the regulation of gratification as one of the criminal acts of corruption in accordance with the value of life in Indonesia, that gratification is not essentially a criminal act. Because gratification is inseparable from the habits of people who have been cultured. In addition, gratuities can be classified as criminal acts of bribery corruption, if the gratuities are given to civil servants / State administrators/officials related to their positions. The receipt of such gratuities is contrary to the obligations or duties of the state administrator.