Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analysis of the Budget Plan for the Construction of Freja House BSD Mass Buildings using the BOW, SNI 2008 & 2021 AHSP Methods Renaldo Pudja Pangestu; Edison H Manurung; Kerlima Hutagaol
Indonesian Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences (ESA) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): March 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/esa.v2i2.3492

Abstract

To plan a project budget, the estimator must have clear and economical method guidelines. The benefits obtained by an Estimator depend on his skills in making cost estimates. If the price bid submitted in the auction process is too high, it is likely that the Estimator will suffer a loss. On the other hand, if you win an auction at a price that is too low, you will experience difficulties in the future. Therefore, cost estimates play an important role in project implementation to plan and control resources such as materials, labor, services and time. In Indonesia, there are methods for planning the unit price of project budget costs, namely BOW (Burgelijke Openbare Werken), SNI 2008 and AHSP 2021. Contractors generally make bid prices based on analysis that is not entirely guided by BOW (Burgelijke Openbare Werken) analysis, SNI 2008 and AHSP 2021 Contractors are more inclined to calculate the unit price of work based on their own analysis based on previous experience in completing a construction job. This study aims to find out what method is the most economical and to be a reference for estimators planning construction costs using the method that applies in Indonesia, not using the method that is self-analyzed.
Analysis of Foreman Performance Factors on the Success of Residential Building Construction Projects Deri Muharam; Edison H Manurung; Kerlima Hutagaol; S. Wardiningsih
Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Science and Technology Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): April 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (376.916 KB) | DOI: 10.55927/marcopolo.v1i3.3775

Abstract

The main focus of productivity in the construction industry is labor productivity, because labor is the resource that has the greatest influence on management. In this case the effort made by an employee is a physical form of motivation, the higher the employee's motivation, the greater the effort he does. This study aims to find out every need that is a top priority that influences the motivation of the Residential House Development project workers. The method used in this study is analytical descriptive, meaning that data is collected and compiled first, then explained and analyzed until finally conclusions are drawn on the existing problems. Data processing uses the computer program SPSS (Statistics Product and Service Solution) version 15.00. Data analysis techniques using validity, reliability, frequency tests, from the analysis it can be seen that bonuses and additional wages are a top priority for physical needs with a total score of 159, good work safety programs are a top priority for security and safety needs with a total score of 148, Relationship Good with fellow workers is a top priority for Social Needs with a total score of 148. Being able to complete work well is a top priority for Recognition Needs with a total score of 145. Good arrangement of work schedules is a top priority for self-identity needs with a total score of 139. Alternatives to increasing worker motivation is by providing bonuses and additional wages when construction workers can complete work before the target.