Tjhong Sendrawan
University Of Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Risalah e-RUPS dalam Sistem eASY.KSEI ditinjau dari POJK Nomor 16/POJK.04/2020 Angelia Mariani Santoso; Tjhong Sendrawan
Unram Law Review Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Unram Law Review(ULREV)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ulrev.v7i1.261

Abstract

Electronic shareholders’ meetings in Indonesia were allowed by article 77 paragraph (2) Law 40/2007 and for public company was regulated by OJK Regulation No. 16/POJK.04/2020. E-Shareholders’ meetings could be held using eASY.KSEI. The minutes must be made by Notary in the form of Relaas deed. The Notary must see, hear, and witness the shareholders’ meetings live. Regardless, the regular shareholders’ meeting still has to be held, unless there are special condition, which was attended by Notary while majority of the shareholders attended the meeting virtually. If there is no regular shareholders’ meeting, Notary will attend virtually. Law 2/2014 explained that “in front of the Notary” means physically, not virtually. Law 40/2007 stated that the minutes must be signed by all shareholders. Meanwhile, the sign was not required in OJK 16/2020. This conflict between two regulations might cause confusion in Notary’s occupation to make the minutes. The issues to be discussed are regarding how Notary carries the occupation to make the e-Shareholders’ meeting’s minutes that was held using eASY.KSEI and regarding the position and strength of evidence of the minutes. The research method used is doctrinal legal research with analytical explanatory as the research typology. Secondary data was used by literature study that analyzed with qualitative method. Based on the research, it was found that in emergency situation, Notary used OJK 16/2020 to make e-shareholders’ meeting’s minutes and the minutes qualifies as an authentic deed. Even though there are no articles that allowed “in front of” Notary virtually in Law 02/2014 and the minutes must be signed by all shareholders according to Law 40/2007, but using “lex spesialis derogat legi generali” principle, Notary should follow OJK regulations. However, since the “specialis” principle is OJK regulation, it is recommended that regulations be made as an act to have a stronger legal basis.
Perbandingan Perkembangan Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Di Indonesia Dan Belanda Khrisna Adjie Laksana; Tjhong Sendrawan
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v6i3.7643

Abstract

The aim of this research is to compare the development of the establishment of Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia and the Netherlands along with the development of society. Regulations regarding Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia have undergone several changes, which are currently regulated in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation which introduces a new form of Company, namely Individual Companies, changes to the law -The law intends to be more in line with current legal developments so that it can accommodate the needs of the community. This writing has an urgency, namely that along with developments over time, of course regulations will also change along with the needs of society. This research compares the consistency of the development and application of regulations in Indonesia and the Netherlands with the aim of learning and developing in the legal field. This research method uses normative juridical research methods. This research has a novelty, namely a discussion related to the comparison regarding the establishment of limited liability companies in Indonesia and in the Netherlands and comparing the consistency regarding changes that are still in accordance with legal principles. The results of this research are that in the Netherlands there are differences with Indonesia, namely related to the status of individual companies, in which case Indonesia has the status of a legal entity, whereas in the Netherlands individual companies are not legal entities. Another difference between the Netherlands and Indonesia that can be seen is the same regarding approval from the government to establish a company, in the Netherlands starting in 2011, the provisions for government approval have been removed and replaced with a system of strict supervision by the ministry. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah membandingkan mengenai perkembangan pendirian perseroan terbatas di Indonesia dengan Belanda seiring perkembangan masyarakat. Pengaturan mengenai perseroan terbatas di Indonesia sudah mengalami beberapa kali perubahan yang mana saat ini diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja yang mengenalkan suatu bentuk perseroan baru yakni perseroan perseorangan, perubahan undang-undang tersebut bermaksud agar lebih sesuai dengan perkembangan hukum saat ini sehingga dapat mengakomodir kebutuhan dari masyarakat. Penelitian ini memiliki urgensi yaitu seiring dengan perkembangan zaman, tentunya peraturan juga akan berubah seiring dengan kebutuhan masyarakat, penelitian ini membandingkan bagaimana konsistensi dari perkembangan dan penerapan peraturan di Indonesia dengan Belanda dengan tujuan sebagai pembelajaran dan pengembangan dalam bidang hukum. metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal. Penelitian ini mempunyai kebaruan yaitu pembahasan terkait perbandingan mengenai pendirian perseroan terbatas di Indonesia dan Belanda dan membandingkan bagaimana konsistensi terkait perubahan yang masih sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu di Belanda memiliki perbedaan dengan Indonesia, yaitu terkait dengan status perusahaan perseorangan yang mana dalam hal ini Indonesia memiliki status sebagai badan hukum, sementara di Belanda perusahaan perseorangan bukanlah badan hukum. Perbedaan lain antara Belanda dan Indonesia yang dapat dilihat dalam halnya terkait persetujuan dari pemerintah untuk mendirikan perseroan, di Belanda mulai pada tahun 2011 telah menghapus ketentuan persetujuan pemerintah dan menggantikannya dengan sistem pengawasan yang ketat oleh kementerian.