Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Cerita Rakyat Jawa Barat Sebagai Pembentuk Literasi Moral pada Peserta Didik Kelas 4 di SD Weninggalih 02 Amelia Rahman; Fadhia Salsabila Hazami; Alifiah Choirunnisa; Siti Jaojah Wiratna; Muhammad Syachtiko; Hana Fauzia Izzati; Tazkiyah .; Adetya Chairul Anhar; Tegar Ananda Pradana; Bobi Fauzi Waryanto
Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Vol 9 No 8 (2023): Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan
Publisher : Peneliti.net

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7865535

Abstract

This study discusses the forms of moral values that exist in folklore in West Java. Moral is the teaching of good or bad deeds and behavior. Moral can be used as a measuring tool to determine the good and bad character or behavior of a person. Folklore is a story that develops and lives in a society. Folklore in ancient times was spread by word of mouth, although at this time many folk tales were written. In a folk tale, there is a moral value of character that is depicted through the story or its characters. These moral values can be used as examples in the daily life of grade 4 students at Weninggalih 02 Elementary School. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The data sources in this study are five folk stories from West Java. The results of this study are forms of moral values read by students who show attitudes towards fellow human beings including (1) helping each other, (2) being honest, (3) respecting others, (4) being responsible, and (5) respecting parents
Analisis Pemikiran Imam Syafi’i dan Imam Ibnu Hazm terhadap Cacat sebagai Alasan Perceraian Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah Amelia Rahman; Arsal Arsal
AHKAM Vol 5 No 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i3.10279

Abstract

Although defects as grounds for divorce in Islamic law have received attention in various previous studies, research that specifically compares the thought of Imam Syafi’i and Imam Ibnu Hazm from the perspective of maslahah mursalah remains limited. This study aims to analyze the views of Imam Syafi’i and Imam Ibnu Hazm regarding defects as grounds for divorce and their relevance from the perspective of maslahah mursalah. This study used a qualitative approach with a library research design. The data sources consisted of primary sources, namely al-Umm by Imam Syafi’i and al-Muhalla by Imam Ibnu Hazm, as well as secondary sources in the form of books, journals, scientific articles, and other documents relevant to the research theme. Data were collected through documentation and literature study techniques and were then analyzed using inductive, deductive, and comparative methods. The results showed that Imam Syafi’i permitted certain defects to be used as grounds for divorce if such defects obstructed the objectives of marriage and caused harm to the spouse. Conversely, Imam Ibnu Hazm argued that defects could not be used as grounds for divorce because there was no scriptural text that explicitly allowed the annulment of marriage due to defects. This difference in views was influenced by the legal istinbāṭ methods used by the two figures; Imam Syafi’i referred to the Qur’an, Sunnah, ijma’, and qiyas, whereas Imam Ibnu Hazm was more oriented toward a textualist approach to scriptural texts. The conclusion of this study affirms the importance of considering public benefit in understanding the dynamics of contemporary Islamic family law, particularly in relation to divorce due to defects. These findings provide a theoretical contribution to the development of Islamic family law studies by clarifying the relationship between maslahah mursalah, maqasid al-syari’ah, and divorce due to defects.