Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora
Busairi Busairi
Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Arts Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Telaah Komparatif Metode Kritik Ḥadīth Sunnī ala Muḥammad al-Ghazālī dan Abū Ja‘far Muḥammad b. Ya‘qūb al-Kulaynī ala Shī‘ah Busairi Busairi
Islamika Inside: Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Vol 3 No 2 (2017): DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Humaniora (FUAH) UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (549.212 KB) | DOI: 10.35719/islamikainside.v3i2.62

Abstract

This article analyzes the method of criticizing the ḥadīth offered by Muḥammad al-Ghazālī from Sunnī school and Abū Ja‘far Muḥammad b. Ya‘qūb al-Kulaynī from Shi‘ite school. The focus of the problem in this study is the difference in the qualifications of hadiths between Sunnī and Shi‘ite schools which are the two largest Islamic schools which always have a theological and political contradiction between the two. From these two figures, it can be concluded that there is an equal method of criticism, which is located in the narrator must be ḍābit and thiqqah. Besides that there are also differences between al-Ghazālī that does not require the connection of narrators and emphasizes more on critical criticism. Whereas al-Kulaynī requires his sanad to be continued, where he equalizes the infallible priest with the Prophet. The criterion is more to the criticism of sanad. The same criteria in the criticism method can facilitate tracking of authentic ḥadīth. Likewise with the different methods of criticism, many traditions are considered valid by the Sunnis but da‘īf according to the Shi‘a and vice versa.
Co-Authors