Saifullah M. Yunus
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-raniry Banda Aceh

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Differences on Punishment between Qanun No. 6 Year 2014 on Hukum Jinayah and The Indonesian Criminal Law (KUHP) [Perbedaan Hukum Pidana Dalam Qanun Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jinayah Dengan Hukum Pidana Indonesia (KUHP)] Saifullah Saifullah
Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Islamic Criminal Law Department, Faculty of Sharia and Law, UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/legitimasi.v9i1.7328

Abstract

Abstract: Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayah has privileges such as caning and fines with pure gold. Privileges like this will certainly cause various problems, among them first, how the Aceh Government applies criminal law that is different from the law generally applicable in Indonesia while Aceh is subject to the Indonesian Government and is not an independent country that can freely form laws as it should. what does he want? Second, will there not be a conflict between the Aceh Jinayah Qanun and the Criminal Code in practice? Then what are the advantages and disadvantages of Qanun Jinayah when compared to the Criminal Code so that the Aceh Government prepares and implements the Qanun? This research is qualitative research by conducting studies and analysis and focusing on the comparison between the criminal law contained in Aceh Qanun No. 6 of 2014 concerning jinayah and criminal law contained in the Criminal Code (KUHP) as the main reference and primary source of criminal law in Indonesia. From the results of research on the two laws and regulations above, this study concludes that there are some very significant differences between the two so that this research needs to be read, analyzed, and studied more deeply by stakeholders in Aceh Province which aims to follow up and improve various legal means and instruments that can support its implementation. Abstrak: Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Jinayah (hukum pidana) memiliki keistimewaan. Dengan keistimewaan ini, Aceh menjadi satu-satunya provinsi di Indonesia yang mendapat legitimasi untuk menerapkan beberapa hukuman pidana yang berbeda dengan hukuman pidana yang tercantum dalam KUHP yang berlaku secara umum di Indonesia seperti hukuman cambuk dan denda dengan emas murni. Keistimewaan seperti ini pasti menimbulkan berbagai problem, di antaranya pertama, bagaimana Pemerintah Aceh menerapkan hukum pidana yang berbeda dengan hukum yang berlaku secara umum di Indonesia sedangkan Aceh tunduk di bawah Pemerintah Indonesia dan bukan sebuah negara yang merdeka yang dapat membentuk perundang-undangan secara leluasa sebagaimana yang diinginkannya? Kedua, apakah tidak akan terjadinya pertentangan antara Qanun Jinayah Aceh dengan KUHP di dalam praktik? Lalu apa keunggulan dan kelebihan Qanun Jinayah jika dibandingkan dengan KUHP sehingga Pemerintah Aceh menyusun dan menerapkan Qanun tersebut? Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan melakukan studi dan analisis serta menitikberatkan kepada perbandingan antara hukum pidana yang terdapat dalam Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang jinayah dan hukum pidana yang terdapat dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) sebagai rujukan utama dan sumber primer hukum pidana di Indonesia. Dari hasil penelitian terhadap kedua aturan perundang-undangan di atas, penelitian ini menyimpulkan adanya beberapa perbedaan yang sangat signifikan antara keduanya sehingga penelitian ini perlu dibaca, dianalisis dan dikaji lebih mendalam oleh para pemangku jabatan (stakeholder) di Provinsi Aceh yang bertujuan untuk menindaklanjuti dan menyempurnakan berbagai sarana dan perangkat hukum yang dapat mendukung penerapannya.
‘Iwaḑ Sebagai Syarat Sah Khulu’ Saifullah M. Yunus; Nurakmal Nurakmal
El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law Vol 3 No 1 (2023): El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal of Family Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Keluarga Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/hadhanah.v3i1.2554

Abstract

Khulu' is a divorce accompanied by a number of assets as 'iwadh (ransom) given by the wife to her husband to redeem herself so that she is released from the marriage bond. 'iwadh is the reward or ransom given by the wife to her husband to ask for khulu῾. In Indonesia, the nominal value of 'iwadh money has been regulated in the Decree of the Minister of Religion No. 411 of 2000 concerning Determination of the Amount of 'iwadh Money in the series of sighat taklik divorce for Muslims already amounting to Rp. 10,000 of which the money is intended for the amil zakat agency, not for the husband. If these rules are studied from the perspective of Islamic law, there is a significant difference in terms of the number and also the objectives of the 'iwadh. The research questions in this thesis are how the law of 'iwadh as khulu compensation' according to Maslahah Mursalah and whether the Minister of Religion Decree No. 411 of 2000 in accordance with the theory of Maslahah Mursalah. In this study the authors used qualitative research methods and a juridical approach. The results of this study conclude that first, the scholars agree that 'iwadh (ransom) is a pillar that cannot be abandoned in the khulu', when viewed from the perspective of maslahah mursalah then both the wife and husband have the benefit of the wife who asks divorce her husband by returning the dowry to her husband because she is afraid that she will not be able to carry out her obligations as a wife (nusyuz), then she can be released from her marriage bond and the husband does not feel disadvantaged because he gets a ransom from his wife. Second, Decree of the Minister of Religion No. 411 of 2000 concerning Determination of the Amount of 'iwadh Money in the series of sighat taklik divorce for Muslims including maslahah mursalah because if this rule is not regulated it will experience difficulties for the wife and will cause arbitrariness of the husband towards the wife. In this rule, 'iwadh as a result of violating taklik divorce is given to the amil zakat.
CHILDFREE AND ITS RELEVANCE TO 'AZL FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TAQIYUDDIN AN-NABHANI Fakhrurrazi M. Yunus; Siti Nurliyana; Azka Amalia Jihad; Aulil Amri; Saifullah M. Yunus
PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH Vol 8 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : LKKI Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/petita.v8i2.235

Abstract

One of the goals of marriage in Islam is to ensure the continuity of someone’s bloodline. However, recently, a new trend has emerged where married couples agree to live without offspring in their household, which, in essence, is contrary to the purpose of marriage itself. The trend to live without children is also called childfree. Substance-wise, the childfree concept is related to 'azl because both concepts reject a child's existence before any potential for having the child exists. In relation to these contemporary issues, Taqiyuddin an-Nabhani's view on 'azl in his book an-Nizham al-Ijtima' fi al-Islam, is still highly relevant to be used as a focal point for any discussion on such issues. Accordingly, this study aims to examine Taqiyuddin An-Nabhani's views on the legal status of 'azl and its relevance to the current childfree concept. This study is a library research study which relies on a historical approach and utilizes some primary data from the book an-Nizham al-Ijtima' fi al-Islam and other books of hadith. The secondary data sources were obtained from other books, journals, previous research, and digital media. Data were analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques. Based on Taqiyuddin An-Nabhani's view, couples who practice 'azl are allowed to use non-permanent contraceptives in an effort to temporarily prevent pregnancy. Meanwhile, the use of permanent contraceptives to prevent pregnancy, such as tubectomy or vasectomy or the use of other means that can cause permanent infertility is haram (forbidden). These should not be used because they are a form of castration. The relevance between 'azl and childfree lies only in denying the existence of children before they potentially form. If childfree is used to delay having children, then its legal status becomes permissible in line with the ruling of 'azl. However, the practice of childfree where a couple would use permanent contraceptives is catagorized as tabattul, which is unlawful because they clearly aim to stop the continuation of human existence. Abstrak: Tujuan dari pernikahan dalam Islam salah satunya adalah untuk melestarikan keturunan. Namun, belakangan ini muncul pemikiran baru untuk hidup tanpa menghadirkan keturunan dalam rumah tangga, yang pada hakikatnya hal ini bertentangan dengan tujuan perkawinan. Pilihan hidup tanpa anak itu disebut juga dengan childfree. Jika dilihat secara substansi, childfree berkaitan dengan ‘azl, karena sama-sama menolak wujudnya anak sebelum potensial wujud. Menanggapi permasalahan kontemporer tersebut, pandangan Taqiyuddin an-nabhani terhadap ‘azl dalam kitabnya an-Nizham al-Ijtima’ fi al-Islam, masih sangat relevan untuk dikaitkan dengan permasalahan childfree ini. Maka berdasarkan uraian tersebut, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pandangan Taqiyuddin An-Nabhani terhadap hukum ‘azl dan mengkaji relevansi childfree dengan hukum ‘azl berdasarkan pandangan Taqiyuddin An Nabhani. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian kepustakaan dengan menggunakan pendekatan histori. Penelitian ini menggunakan sumber data primer yang diperoleh dari kitab an-Nizham al-Ijtima’ fi al-Islam dan kitab hadits lainnya. Untuk sumber data sekunder diperoleh dari buku-buku, jurnal-jurnal, dan penelitian terdahulu serta media internet. Data dianalisis dengan teknik analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan pandangan Taqiyuddin An-Nabhani, hukum ‘azl dapat diterapkan pada penggunaan alat-alat kontrasepsi non-permanen untuk mencegah kehamilan secara sementara. Sedangkan pencegahan kehamilan yang bersifat permanen seperti tubektomi atau vasektomi, dan upaya lainnya yang dapat menimbulkan kemandulan permanen, adalah haram. Ini tidak boleh dilakukan karena termasuk salah satu jenis pengebirian. Relevansi antara ‘azl dan childfree hanya terletak pada substansi sama-sama menolak adanya anak sebelum potensial wujud. childfree yang dengan tujuan menunda untuk memiliki keturunan, hukumnya boleh sebagaimana hukum ‘azl. Sedangkan childfree yang menggunakan alat kontrasepsi permanen, maka termasuk dalam tabattul dan hukumnya adalah haram, karena tujuan dari keduanya dapat menghentikan proses keberlangsungan umat manusia. Kata Kunci: Hidup Tanpa Anak, ‘Azl, Taqiyuddin An-Nabhani
‘Iwaḑ Sebagai Syarat Sah Khulu’ Saifullah M. Yunus; Nurakmal Nurakmal
El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law Vol 3 No 1 (2023): El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal of Family Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Keluarga Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/hadhanah.v3i1.2554

Abstract

Khulu' is a divorce accompanied by a number of assets as 'iwadh (ransom) given by the wife to her husband to redeem herself so that she is released from the marriage bond. 'iwadh is the reward or ransom given by the wife to her husband to ask for khulu῾. In Indonesia, the nominal value of 'iwadh money has been regulated in the Decree of the Minister of Religion No. 411 of 2000 concerning Determination of the Amount of 'iwadh Money in the series of sighat taklik divorce for Muslims already amounting to Rp. 10,000 of which the money is intended for the amil zakat agency, not for the husband. If these rules are studied from the perspective of Islamic law, there is a significant difference in terms of the number and also the objectives of the 'iwadh. The research questions in this thesis are how the law of 'iwadh as khulu compensation' according to Maslahah Mursalah and whether the Minister of Religion Decree No. 411 of 2000 in accordance with the theory of Maslahah Mursalah. In this study the authors used qualitative research methods and a juridical approach. The results of this study conclude that first, the scholars agree that 'iwadh (ransom) is a pillar that cannot be abandoned in the khulu', when viewed from the perspective of maslahah mursalah then both the wife and husband have the benefit of the wife who asks divorce her husband by returning the dowry to her husband because she is afraid that she will not be able to carry out her obligations as a wife (nusyuz), then she can be released from her marriage bond and the husband does not feel disadvantaged because he gets a ransom from his wife. Second, Decree of the Minister of Religion No. 411 of 2000 concerning Determination of the Amount of 'iwadh Money in the series of sighat taklik divorce for Muslims including maslahah mursalah because if this rule is not regulated it will experience difficulties for the wife and will cause arbitrariness of the husband towards the wife. In this rule, 'iwadh as a result of violating taklik divorce is given to the amil zakat.
‘Iwaḑ as a Legitimate Condition of Khulu’ (Study on the Analysis of the Decree of the Minister of Religious Affairs No. 411 of 2000 Viewed from the Theory of Al-Maslahah Al-Mursalah): ‘Iwaḑ Sebagai Syarat Sah Khulu’ (Studi Analisis Keputusan Menteri Agama No. 411 Tahun 2000 Ditinjau Dari Teori Al-Maslahah Al-Mursalah) M. Yunus, Saifullah; Nurakmal, Nurakmal
El-Hadhanah : Indonesian Journal Of Family Law And Islamic Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): El-Hadhanah: Indonesian Journal of Family Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Keluarga Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/hadhanah.v3i1.2554

Abstract

Khulu' is a divorce accompanied by a number of assets as 'iwadh (ransom) given by the wife to her husband to redeem herself so that she is released from the marriage bond. 'iwadh is the reward or ransom given by the wife to her husband to ask for khulu῾. In Indonesia, the nominal value of 'iwadh money has been regulated in the Decree of the Minister of Religion No. 411 of 2000 concerning Determination of the Amount of 'iwadh Money in the series of sighat taklik divorce for Muslims already amounting to Rp. 10,000 of which the money is intended for the amil zakat agency, not for the husband. If these rules are studied from the perspective of Islamic law, there is a significant difference in terms of the number and also the objectives of the 'iwadh. The research questions in this thesis are how the law of 'iwadh as khulu compensation' according to Maslahah Mursalah and whether the Minister of Religion Decree No. 411 of 2000 in accordance with the theory of Maslahah Mursalah. In this study the authors used qualitative research methods and a juridical approach. The results of this study conclude that first, the scholars agree that 'iwadh (ransom) is a pillar that cannot be abandoned in the khulu', when viewed from the perspective of maslahah mursalah then both the wife and husband have the benefit of the wife who asks divorce her husband by returning the dowry to her husband because she is afraid that she will not be able to carry out her obligations as a wife (nusyuz), then she can be released from her marriage bond and the husband does not feel disadvantaged because he gets a ransom from his wife. Second, Decree of the Minister of Religion No. 411 of 2000 concerning Determination of the Amount of 'iwadh Money in the series of sighat taklik divorce for Muslims including maslahah mursalah because if this rule is not regulated it will experience difficulties for the wife and will cause arbitrariness of the husband towards the wife. In this rule, 'iwadh as a result of violating taklik divorce is given to the amil zakat.