Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Yuridis Jurist-Diction
Ahmad Fadli Fauzi
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Eksistensi Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian Internasional Dalam Hukum Postif Dan Implementasinya Perjanjian Celah Timor Ahmad Fadli Fauzi
Jurist-Diction Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): Volume 6 No. 2, April 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v6i2.44077

Abstract

AbstractThis study indicate that the existence of international treaty law principles has been recognized by international law subjects or the international community and is listed in the Vienna Conventions of 1969 and 1986, UU 24/2000 concerning International Agreements. The implementation of the principles of international law can be seen in the case of the Timor Gap Agreement. In the agreement previously there was an agreement involving the state of Indonesia and Australia so that the pacta sunt servanda postulate came into effect. Then, the separation of the state of Indonesia and East Timor had implications for a fundamental shift in conditions within Indonesia's territory and the entry into force of the rebus sic stantibus postulate and in the previous Timor Gap Agreement (Indonesia and Australia, 1989) did not apply to Timor Leste as a third party in accordance with the postulate of the Pact. tertiis nec nosent nec prosunt principle, because the agreement only involves Indonesia and Australia. Keywords: Interest subsidies; legitimacy of government; Directorate General of Treasury AbstrakPenelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa eksistensi asas-asas hukum perjanjian inetrnasional telah diakui oleh subjek hukum internasional atau masyarakat internasional dan tercantum dalam Vienna Conventions tahun 1969 dan 1986, Undang-Undang 24/2000 tentang dengan Perjanjian Internasional. Implementasi dalam asas-asas hukum internasional dapat dilihat pada kasus perjanjian celah timor. Dalam perjanjian tersebut sebelumnya terjadi kesepakatan yang melibatkan negara Indonesia dengan Australia sehingga berlakunya postulat pacta sunt servanda. Kemudian, dengan berpisahnya negara Indonesia dengan Timor Timur berimplikasi pada terjadinya pergeseran keadaan yang fundamental dalam wilayah Indonesia serta berlakunya postulat rebus sic stantibus dan dalam perjanjian celah timor sebelumnya (Indonesia dan Australia, 1989) tidak berlaku bagi Timor Leste sebagai pihak ketiga sesuai dengan postulat pacta tertiis nec nosent nec prosunt principle, karena dalam perjanjian tersebut hanya melibatkan Indonesia dan Australia. Kata Kunci: Subsidi Bunga; keabsahan tindakan pemerintahan; Direktorat Jenderal Perbendaharaan
REALITAS SOSIAL SEBAGAI DASAR PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN PENETAPAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA PUSAT NOMOR 155/PDT.P/2023/PN.JKT.PST Ahmad Fadli Fauzi
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i2.9603

Abstract

The discourse surrounding interfaith marriage has consistently been a prominent area of legal scholarship in Indonesia. The Indonesian Conference on Religion and Peace (ICRP) indicates that from 2005 to 2023, 1,645 couples who were members of different religious groups were married. This article examines the manner in which social reality serves as the foundation for judges' considerations in the adjudication of applications for interfaith marriages. This article employs a descriptive normative legal research methodology, utilising both a statutory approach and a case approach. This article finds that the social reality in Indonesia is characterised by a high degree of diversity with regard to religion, culture, ethnicity and language, which contributes to the country's distinctive identity, particularly in the context of the special capital city of Jakarta. The Central Jakarta District Court, in its Stipulation Decision (No. 155/Pdt.P/2023/PN.Jkt.Pst), granted the petitioners' request to apply for marriage registration at an authorised institution. In reaching its decision, the judge placed significant emphasis on the social reality of the case as a key factor in determining the legal validity of interfaith marriages. The verdict offers an indirect description of the social reality of Indonesia's plural society, particularly in the context of the Special Capital Region of Jakarta. It is therefore imperative that the issue of interfaith marriages be firmly regulated within the norms of the Marriage Law, in order to prevent the creation of legal vacuums and uncertainty.
Co-Authors