Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings
Dana Puspitasari
Accounting Program, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Surabaya 60294, Indonesia
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Ethics in Learning: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Endah Susilowati; Diah Hari Suryaningrum; Sari Andayani; Wulandari Hidayanti; Dana Puspitasari; Brian Bayu Ramadhan; St. Rohmawatik; Zakharia Vito Trinova
Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings 7st International Seminar of Research Month 2022
Publisher : Future Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11594/nstp.2023.3392

Abstract

Researchers have used a systematic literature review to map the existing research, find existing knowledge of any field, and its gaps, and finally suggest possible future research. However, few studies assessing the nature and quality of systematic review papers published in the ethics and learning literature have been conducted. In this study, we use a list of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to systematically review the systematic review article on ethics in learning. We used data from crossref and google scholars indexed journals in the last decade from 2013 to 2022. We employed the terms “ethics, learning, and review” to obtain the ethics in learning review articles. The results of this study will provide researchers on how the review literature procedures have been conducted. This study not only will enhance our understanding of the procedures followed by scholars in doing systematic reviews, but also illustrate some limitations in the design, method, and implementation of current systematic reviews.
Ethics in Learning: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Endah Susilowati; Diah Hari Suryaningrum; Sari Andayani; Wulandari Hidayanti; Dana Puspitasari; Brian Bayu Ramadhan; St. Rohmawatik; Zakharia Vito Trinova
Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings 7st International Seminar of Research Month 2022
Publisher : Future Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11594/nstp.2023.3392

Abstract

Researchers have used a systematic literature review to map the existing research, find existing knowledge of any field, and its gaps, and finally suggest possible future research. However, few studies assessing the nature and quality of systematic review papers published in the ethics and learning literature have been conducted. In this study, we use a list of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to systematically review the systematic review article on ethics in learning. We used data from crossref and google scholars indexed journals in the last decade from 2013 to 2022. We employed the terms “ethics, learning, and review” to obtain the ethics in learning review articles. The results of this study will provide researchers on how the review literature procedures have been conducted. This study not only will enhance our understanding of the procedures followed by scholars in doing systematic reviews, but also illustrate some limitations in the design, method, and implementation of current systematic reviews.
Co-Authors Brian Bayu Ramadhan Diah Hari Suryaningrum Endah Susilowati Sari Andayani St. Rohmawatik Wulandari Hidayanti Zakharia Vito Trinova