Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Estudiante Law Journal
Siti Hardiyanti Abas
Faculty of Law, State University of Gorontalo, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Differences In the Imposition of Corruption Criminal Sanctions Siti Hardiyanti Abas
Estudiante Law Journal VOL. 4 NO. 2 JUNI 2022
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (357.123 KB) | DOI: 10.33756/eslaj.v4i2.18348

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out whether or not the District Court's decision in decision No. 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/Pn Gto and No. 09/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/Pn Gto and the factors behind the differences in the imposition of sanctions in the two cases. The research method is normative research. Research resultverdict no. 18/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/Pn Gto the three pieces of evidence which were one of the judge's considerations in imposing a sentence on the defendant. The fact of the trial was that the defendant had been legally proven to have committed a crime that was detrimental to the state so through the two conditions for imposing a sentence, the judge's conviction was built that the defendant was the perpetrator so that the decision was appropriate as a criminal responsibility committed by the defendant. Verdict No. 09/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/Pn Gto because no evidence was found in the form of letters and witness statements which could prove that the defendant had committed a crime. The fact of the trial formed the judge's belief that the defendant was not proven to have committed a crime and the defendant must be acquitted of all lawsuits.
Co-Authors