Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary
Nathalie Cristine Lumban Gaol
Universitas Tarumanagara
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Juridical Review of the Authority of the Constitutional Court in Settlement of General Election Disputes Rasji Rasji; Nathalie Cristine Lumban Gaol; Zahra Alsabilah
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol 2, No 1 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i1.528

Abstract

Indonesia as a democratic country cannot be separated from the voice of the people in running its government. Every Indonesian citizen has the right to vote and be elected as stipulated in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights. As a milestone in the embodiment of the principles of democracy, general elections to elect representatives of the people must be based on the voice of the people. In the general election process, it is not uncommon for errors to occur in determining the results of the vote acquisition results which can lead to a particular conflict. Taking into account the error in determining the results of the vote acquisition or what is commonly referred to as the General Election Result Dispute (PHPU), it is necessary to have a method of settlement that can be carried out by the Constitutional Court. In this case the author examines what is the authority of the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over the Obtaining of General Election Results (PHPU) and regarding the procedures for resolving disputes over the Obtaining of General Election Results (PHPU) in accordance with existing laws and regulations.
Juridical Review of the Authority of the Constitutional Court in Settlement of General Election Disputes Rasji Rasji; Nathalie Cristine Lumban Gaol; Zahra Alsabilah
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v2i1.528

Abstract

Indonesia as a democratic country cannot be separated from the voice of the people in running its government. Every Indonesian citizen has the right to vote and be elected as stipulated in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights. As a milestone in the embodiment of the principles of democracy, general elections to elect representatives of the people must be based on the voice of the people. In the general election process, it is not uncommon for errors to occur in determining the results of the vote acquisition results which can lead to a particular conflict. Taking into account the error in determining the results of the vote acquisition or what is commonly referred to as the General Election Result Dispute (PHPU), it is necessary to have a method of settlement that can be carried out by the Constitutional Court. In this case the author examines what is the authority of the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over the Obtaining of General Election Results (PHPU) and regarding the procedures for resolving disputes over the Obtaining of General Election Results (PHPU) in accordance with existing laws and regulations.
Pelaksanaan Hukum Pidana Adat Baduy Ditinjau Dari Hukum Nasional Maria Cecilia Nugroho; Stephanie Patricia Prasetyo; Nathalie Cristine Lumban Gaol; Amelia Natalie Putri
Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/jerumi.v1i2.1267

Abstract

Pluralisme dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia yang terdiri atas hukum adat, hukum islam, dan hukum barat menciptakan keunikan tersendiri bagi pelaksanaan hukum di Indonesia. Hukum adat dan hukum nasional yang begitu rekat menyebabkan terjadinya harmonisasi antara hukum pidana adat dengan hukum nasional. Masyarakat baduy dalam pelaksanaan hukumnya menganut ultimum remedium sebagai bentuk penyelesaian suatu tindakan hukum. Sistem dan tata cara masyarakat Baduy dalam melaksanakan hukum adat Baduy telah dirasa cukup efektif dan efisien bagi kehidupan mereka. Tentunya pelaksanaan hukum adat Baduy ini tidak terlepas dari tantangan-tantangan karena harus sesuai dengan sistem hukum nasional. Walaupun tantangan tersebut dirasakan oleh masyarakat Baduy, tetapi tetap ada penerapan dari penyelesaian setiap kasus yang terjadi.
Co-Authors Amelia Natalie Putri Maria Cecilia Nugroho Rasji Stephanie Patricia Prasetyo Zahra Alsabilah