Tunjung Sulaksono
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALISIS RESPON MASYARAKAT TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN VAKSIN COVID-19 DI INDONESIA MELALUI MEDIA BERITA Muhammad Farhan HR; Suranto; Tunjung Sulaksono
Moderat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan Vol 9 No 2 (2023): Mei 2023
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan FISIP Universitas Galuh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/moderat.v9i2.2909

Abstract

This study aims to see how the community responds to the Covid-19 vaccine policy carried out by the government in fortifying themselves against the transmission of the Covid-19 virus in Indonesia. This study used the Q-DAS (Qualitative Data Analysis Software) approach. In addition, in this study, data sources were taken from 2 different National News Media, with a total of 31 consisting of 15 news from Detik.com and 16 from Kompas.com. Apart from the news media, this research data source was also taken through websites and journals related to the author's research. The provision of a vaccine policy carried out by the government is the most appropriate solution for the community to break and reduce the chain of transmission of Covid-19. However, some people refuse this policy. The news media has a vital role in seeing, for various reasons, people who are ready and refuse to be vaccinated after the government implemented the Covid-19 vaccine policy in Indonesia. The results showed that the higher the type of Indonesian people's age group responded ready to be vaccinated, and the lower the type of Indonesian people's age group, the fewer those who responded were ready to be vaccinated. Most refuse to be vaccinated because the public responds doubtfully to the safety of vaccines
‘Spectator’ or Player’? Labor Movements in Post New-Order Indonesian Electoral Politics Tunjung Sulaksono; Kuskridho Ambardi
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Vol 10, No 1 (2019): February 2019
Publisher : Department of Government Affairs and Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgp.10196

Abstract

This study proves that the change in the structure of political opportunities alone is not enough to provide encouragement for social movements to succeed in electoral politics. The case of the labor movements in electoral politics in post-New Order Indonesia is proof of this. Even though it has a very large number of potential to become a large force of electoral politics and ability to mobilize masses, the labor movements in Indonesia is merely a spectator, not a player in electoral politics. There are four factors that cause this failure. The first is fragmentation among labor movements which were created as a result of the opening of political opportunities after the New Order. Second, labor apathy towards labor parties and labor cadres who run for elections. As a result, none of the labor parties succeeded in gaining seats in three elections in Indonesia after the New Order. Thirdly, repression and negative stigmatization to the labor movements by the New Order Regime had succeeded in preventing labor movement to consolidate themselves and to gain significant votes in elections. Fourth, increasingly severe requirements for party establishment and participation in elections. While in many places the opening of political opportunity structure is a determining factor in the success of social movements in electoral politics, the case of the labor movement in Indonesia proves otherwise. The opening up of a political opportunity structure has become a trap that hinders the success of labor movements in electoral politics.