Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer
Kelvin Yabes Sitompul
Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Evaluasi Proses Bisnis Produksi Area 3 (SRIKANDI) Pada PT Tirta Investama (AQUA) Pandaan Menggunakan Metode Value Chain Analysis, Quality Evaluation Framework (QEF) dan 5 Why's Analysis Kelvin Yabes Sitompul; Yusi Tyroni Mursityo; Nanang Yudi Setiawan
Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer Vol 3 No 5 (2019): Mei 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Komputer (FILKOM), Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (884.701 KB)

Abstract

PT Tirta Investama (AQUA) Pandaan is a company engaged in the production of Bottled Drinking Water. PT Tirta Investama (AQUA) Pandaan produces a variety of products, ranging from 220 ML, 600 ML, 1500 ML, 5 Gallon and Mizone packages. Manufacturing Area 3 (SRIKANDI) is one of the manufacturing divisions at PT Tirta Investama (AQUA) Pandaan that produces 220 ML bottled water. In carrying out the 220 ML packaging production process, there are problems that occur which cause the results of the business process to be carried out not in accordance with the expected targets and can affect the production business process in manufacturing area 3 (SRIKANDI). Based on these problems, it is necessary to conduct an evaluation of the current business processes by identifying current business processes using the Value Chain Analysis method to map the main activities and supporting activities, then determine the quality factors that exist and perform calculations at all quality factors by using the Quality Evaluation Framework (QEF). Then look for the root problem in quality factors that are not in accordance with method 5 Why Analysis. The evaluation results obtained obtained 4 quality factors that were not appropriate, namely in Q5, Q8, Q11 and Q12. The results of these quality factors become problems that can affect the production business processes that are applied.
Co-Authors Nanang Yudi Setiawan Yusi Tyroni Mursityo