Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ISJOUST
Ui Ardaninggar Luhtitianti
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Astronomy Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Rationality of Ibn Khaldun and Machiavelli In Thought of Religious and Political Relations Ui Ardaninggar Luhtitianti
Islamic Studies Journal for Social Transformation ISJOUST Vol 4, No 1, 2020
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP2M) IAIN Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (363.682 KB) | DOI: 10.28918/isjoust.v4i1.3331

Abstract

This article aims to describe Ibn Khaldun and Machiavelli's thoughts in the context of religious and political relations. How are the differences and similarities, and what is the background for their thinking? The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative, with secondary data sources from various literature in the form of books and journal articles that discuss the political, religious, and state thoughts of the two figures. The results of the analysis reveal that Ibn Khaldun and Machiavelli's political, religious, and state thoughts were born as an antithesis to the previous idealistic tendencies of thought. The socio-political situation that developed during their lifetime is one of the causes of these differences in style and significantly influences their thinking. In the context of practical politics, they tend to be rational. Meanwhile, they place religion as an institution that has an essential role as an adhesive element in society. Both of them argue that religion is a social institution that is functional towards the stability of the state.
The Rationality of Ibn Khaldun and Machiavelli In Thought of Religious and Political Relations Ui Ardaninggar Luhtitianti
Islamic Studies Journal for Social Transformation Vol 4 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/isjoust.v4i1.11941

Abstract

This article aims to describe Ibn Khaldun and Machiavelli's thoughts in the context of religious and politicalrelations. How are the differences and similarities, and what is the background for their thinking? The methodused in this research is descriptive qualitative, with secondary data sources from various literature in the form ofbooks and journal articles that discuss the political, religious, and state thoughts of the two figures. The results ofthe analysis reveal that Ibn Khaldun and Machiavelli's political, religious, and state thoughts were born as anantithesis to the previous idealistic tendencies of thought. The socio-political situation that developed during theirlifetime is one of the causes of these differences in style and significantly influences their thinking. In the context ofpractical politics, they tend to be rational. Meanwhile, they place religion as an institution that has an essentialrole as an adhesive element in society. Both of them argue that religion is a social institution that is functionaltowards the stability of the state.
Co-Authors