Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Juridical Analysis Of Settlement Of Land Disputes Through Decisions Of Customary Institutions Asriadi Asriadi; Rineke Sara; Zudan Arief Fakrulloh
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 10 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v2i10.454

Abstract

The land is a natural resource that has a very important role because the land is needed by humans for various kinds of life interests such as living, farming, trying, and so on. The policy for the development of the land sector in Indonesia is essentially rooted in the provisions of the 1945 Constitution Article 33 paragraph (3) which reads "Earth, water and the natural resources contained therein are controlled by the state and used for the greatest prosperity of the people". To guarantee legal certainty in the field of land, Article 19 paragraph (1) of the UUPA stipulates: "To guarantee legal certainty, the government will carry out land registration throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia according to the provisions stipulated by government regulations". Even though it has been regulated in such a way, the problem of land disputes continues and will forever occur due to conflicts of various interests. In customary law communities, disputes that occur are resolved by deliberation and consensus through customary institutions. This study aims to determine (1) the existence of Customary Institutions in resolving disputes in indigenous peoples, and (2) the authority of customary institutions in resolving disputes in customary law communities.
Law Enforcement Of The Criminal Action Of Drug Distribution According To Law No. 35 Of 2009 (Case Study Of Polres Semarang) Suyatin Suyatin; Azis Budianto; Rineke Sara
Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Vol. 2 No. 10 (2023): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jrssem.v2i10.461

Abstract

Policing opiates violations has been completed by various policemen and has gotten many adjudicator's choices. Policing be an impediment to the expansion in unlawful exchange and dissemination of opiates, however truly, the more concentrated policing did, the more dispersion and illegal exchange of opiates will likewise increment. Official arrangements overseeing opiates issues have been drafted and authorized, be that as it may, offenses connected with opiates have not been mollified. These last cases have gotten many street pharmacists and vendors and got serious assents, yet different culprits appear to disregard them and, surprisingly, will generally grow their area of activities. The narcotics crime referred to in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics provides for quite severe criminal sanctions, however, in reality, the number of perpetrators of crimes is increasing, and convicts, in reality, are not deterred that there is a tendency to repeat them. It is caused by criminal imposition factors that existed and have no impact or deterrent effect on the perpetrators. Law Number 35 of 2009 is no longer based on the imposition of punishment for each drug abuse which is felt to be less effective in eradicating or reducing narcotics crimes.
Benefit-Sharing from The Utilization of Genetic Resources As an Inclusive, Equitable, and Sustainable Form of Protection For Communal Intellectual Property Ibrahim Ibrahim; Rineke Sara
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1406

Abstract

Genetic resources hold strategic value for science and industry, and their utilization is often linked to the traditional knowledge of indigenous communities. Indonesian law recognizes Communal Intellectual Property Rights through Law No. 11 of 2013, which ratifies the Nagoya Protocol and emphasizes fair benefit-sharing from the utilization of genetic resources, as well as Government Regulation No. 56 of 2022 on Communal Intellectual Property. However, in practice, the economic utilization of biodiversity has not yet been fully accompanied by fair profit-sharing mechanisms for local communities. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions regarding communal intellectual property rights over genetic resources within the Indonesian legal system and to examine profit-sharing mechanisms for the utilization of genetic resources in order to achieve inclusive, equitable, and sustainable protection for indigenous peoples and local communities. The research method employed is a normative legal approach, using both statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that mechanisms for sharing benefits derived from the utilization of genetic resources are key instruments for ensuring justice for local communities and supporting the sustainable management of biodiversity. However, regulations regarding this matter remain scattered across various laws and have not comprehensively addressed benefit-sharing mechanisms. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt the principles contained in the Nagoya Protocol, which emphasizes fair and equitable benefit-sharing in agreements with indigenous communities as the rightful holders of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge
Legal Protection for Workers Experiencing Depression Due to Workplace Bullying: Reconstructing Corporate Responsibility in Indonesian Labor Law Manda Berinandus; Rineke Sara
Jurnal Sosial Teknologi Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi
Publisher : CV. Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/jurnalsostech.v6i5.32838

Abstract

Workplace bullying has emerged as a significant issue affecting workers' mental health and well-being. In many cases, repeated psychological intimidation, humiliation, or exclusion in the workplace can have serious mental health consequences, including depression. Despite growing awareness of mental health protection in employment relationships, Indonesian labor law does not explicitly regulate workplace bullying or corporate liability for psychological harm experienced by workers. This normative legal research aims to analyze the existing legal protection framework for workers experiencing depression due to workplace bullying and to reconstruct the concept of corporate liability in Indonesian labor law. This research uses legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches by examining relevant laws and regulations, legal doctrine, and international standards related to mental health protection in the workplace. The research findings show that Indonesian labor regulations still focus on physical aspects of occupational safety and health, leaving significant regulatory gaps regarding psychological safety in the workplace. Consequently, workers experiencing depression due to workplace bullying often face difficulties in obtaining effective legal remedies. This study proposes a reconstruction of corporate responsibility through the integration of psychological safety aspects into occupational health protection, the application of the corporate duty of care principle, and the establishment of preventative mechanisms within corporate governance. This reconstruction is expected to strengthen legal protection for workers' mental health while encouraging the creation of more humane and equitable industrial relations.