Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.307
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Rechtsidee Pembaharuan Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambura Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Nurani Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Abdimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Business, Law, and Education YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Baileo: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science
Setiawan Noerdajasakti
Faculty Of Law Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 41 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 41 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IN THE PERPECTIVE OF NON DEROGABLE RIGHTS Noerdajasakti, Setiawan
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Law and Human Rights Issues
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (90.3 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2016.00301.01

Abstract

Capital punishment is still exist as one of kind punishments in Indonesia. The existence of capital punishment is based on the Penal Code and other laws. On the other hand, however, according to Constitution 1945, MPR Decree Number XVII/MPR/1988 on Human Rights and Law Number 39 / 1999 on Human Rights, the right to live cannot be limited under any circumstances (non derogable). Capital punishment and the right to live as the right that cannot be limited under any circumstances (non derogable) are contradictive. This contradiction results a conflict of norm between legislations that legalize the existence of capital punishment and legislations that legalize the existence of the right to live.  Solutions should be resulted to solve the conflict of norms.
Legis Ratio Norms Article 64 of Law No. 1 Year 2004 Concerning State Treasure Pakpahan, Alman P.; Sudarsono, Sudarsono; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Permadi, Iwan
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Vol 4, No 3 (2021): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute August
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v4i3.2255

Abstract

Article 64 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Law no. 1 of 2004 concerning the State Treasury, states firmly that the Treasurer and other officials who have been determined to compensate the state/regional losses in settlements with the dimensions of State Administrative Law may still be subject to administrative sanctions and/or criminal sanctions. And if the treasurer and other officials are processed under criminal law, the criminal decision does not relieve the claim for compensation that has been determined through a settlement with the dimensions of State Administrative Law. Such norms are regulated in Article 64 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Law no. 1 of 2004 concerning the State Treasury, of course, has the purpose and intent (ratio legis) of the legislators. Based on research on the minutes of the discussion of the Draft Law no. 1 of 2004 concerning the State Treasury, the legislative ratio of Article 64 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) in general is 3 (three), namely: as a form of official accountability in carrying out office functions, punishment for Treasurers and Other Officials who are detrimental to State/Regional finances, and realizing the principle of returning State/Regional losses.
Constitution Reposition of the 1945 Constitution in Justice Collaborators Based on Human Rights Joko Cahyono; Herman Suryokumoro; Nurini Aprilianda; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute May
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i2.5702

Abstract

Arrangements for the implementation and granting of the status of collaborating witnesses or known as Justice Collaborator Which invites the issue of pros and cons about the benefits and consequences that can be used as legal commodities, as well as subjectivity in the provision of its determination. To answer the question that has become public unrest, a comprehensive interpretation of the law is needed both grammatically, historically and juridically in order to obtain an understanding of whether the legal politics in the LPSK Law which regulates the Justice Collaborator has been in accordance with the objectives in terms of uncovering the main actors and restoring state losses related to the economy and development. Furthermore, to examine why the determination of Justice Collaborator on corruption crimes does not immediately realize a social justice as in paragraph IV of the Preamble to the Republic of Indonesia Constitution Th. 1945. It is very possible that the existing norms are incomplete, so they must be reconstructed by accommodating the principles of expediency and justice while still having a progressive nature of law enforcement in order to create ideal norms.
UNSUR SUBSOSIALITAS KRIMINALISASI PERBUATAN PADA PASAL 55 DAN 56 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG AKUNTAN PUBLIK Nurini Aprilianda; Faizin Sulistio; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
Arena Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2013)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (830.296 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2013.00601.4

Abstract

Abstract This research was conducted to explore the basic idea behind the use of criminal provision in Article 55 and 56 of Act Number 5 of 2011 on Public Accountants. This search was conducted to locate and find the justification used for means of criminal law in the regulation of public accounting actions that are considered dangerous and harmful to society. This study tried to construct a theory of the use ”subsocialiteit” who was instrumental in the idea of the use of criminal law as a means of crime prevention in Act Number 5 of 2011. The results can be concluded is the basic idea of the use of criminal law in Article 55 and 56 of Act Number 5 of 2011 is based on some legislators ratio, namely: (1) Philosophically a safeguard against the profession as well as protection, (2) Provide legal certainty the public accountants and law enforcement, (3) Transparency and professionalism in making the financial statement audit, (4) Provide a deterrent effect, (5) Moral panic. The construction of the idea was based on the concept of ”subsocialiteit” and fears of harmful acts against the interests of the public accountant is realized by providing a model of criminalization that is expected to provide a balance in penal policy formulation, using a modeling and the legal principle approach (criminal). Key words: criminalization, subsociality AbstrakPenelitian ini dilakukan untuk menelusuri ide dasar yang melatarbelakangi penggunaan ketentuan pidana dalam Pasal 55 dan 56  Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2011 tentang Akuntan Publik. Penelusuran ini dilakukan untuk mencari dan menemukan dasar pembenaran yang digunakan untuk menggunakan sarana hukum pidana dalam pengaturan perbuatan akuntan publik yang dianggap berbahaya dan merugikan masyarakat. Penelitian ini mencoba mengkonstruksi penggunaan “teori subsosialitas” yang sangat berperan dalam ide pengunaan hukum pidana sebagai sarana penanggulangan kejahatan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2011. Hasil  yang dapat disimpulkan adalah ide dasar penggunaan hukum pidana dalam Pasal 55 dan 56 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2011 didasarkan pada beberapa rasio legis, yaitu: (1)Secara filosofis merupakan upaya perlindungan terhadap masyarakat sekaligus perlindungan profesi; (2)Memberikan kepastian hukum kepada akuntan publik dan penegak hukum; (3)Transparansi dan profesionalitas dalam pembuatan audit laporan keuangan; (4)Memberikan efek jera; (5)Kepanikan moral. Kontruksi terhadap ide yang disandarkan kepada konsep subsosialitas dan kekhawatiran akan berbahaya perbuatan akuntan publik terhadap kepentingan masyarakat diwujudkan dengan memberikan model kriminalisasi yang diharapkan memberikan keseimbangan dalam formulasi kebijakan penal, yaitu dengan menggunakan model pendekatan keseimbangan dan asas hukum (pidana).Kata kunci: kriminalisasi, subsosialitas
Relation Between Plea of Guilty and Defendants Right in RUU KUHAP (An Overview Through “Jalur Khusus” System) Intan Khoirun Nisa'; Abdul Madjid; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 4 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i04.p06

Abstract

The stacks of cases in judicial institutions hinder achieving the principles of fast, simple, low-cost justice. Through the Drafting Team for the Criminal Procedure Code Draft, the intention is to try to adopt a system that commonly applies in the common law legal system, namely plea bargaining “jalur khusus”” which is shown in Article 199 of the RUU KUHAP. This research intends to examine the concept of plea of guilty used in special channels and to look for the relationship between giving a plea of guilty and the rights of the defendant. This research uses normative juridical research methods or library legal research using conceptual and analytical approaches. The technique for collecting legal materials used is the library research model. From this research it can be concluded that the plea of guilty given by the defendant to the indictment by the public prosecutor must be voluntary, in this case, the judge will assess the truth of the Plea of Guilty. It brings consequences that the trial process will faster for the defendant. However, ““jalur khusus”” do not specifically regulate what defendant right will release if he confesses to the charges, moreover there is a gap that need to be resolve. This has the potential for uncertainty for the defendant. Apart from that, there is no regulation regarding the right to file legal action which will have an impact on the defendant's right to obtain legal certainty regarding efficient time to achieve a speedy trial.
Local Inspectıon Arrangements In The Process Of Provıng A Crımınal Case Trıal Rieya Aprianti; Prija Djatmika; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 03 (2024): August Asian Journal of Management Entrepreneurship and Social Science ( AJMES
Publisher : Cita Konsultindo Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In seeking material truth in a criminal case, in addition to being based on two pieces of evidence as regulated in a restrictive manner in the Criminal Procedure Code, in practice it is also known to carry out local examinations to increase the judge's confidence in whether or not the acts charged to the defendant are proven or not. The local examination by the Judge in the process of proving a criminal case can be said to be part of the Judge's discretion carried out in the event that the judge deems it necessary for the purpose of proving at trial. However, so far there has not been a single regulation that explicitly regulates this local examination in the criminal procedure law, causing a legal vacuum. This legal void then gives rise to various legal implications in the practice of criminal procedure law. The research method used is normative legal research with a legislative approach, a conceptual approach, and a case study approach. The legal materials used include primary legal materials that include laws and regulations and judges' decisions, secondary legal materials sourced from books or literature that are directly or indirectly related to the legal writing to be studied, and tertiary legal materials obtained from legal dictionaries or large Indonesian Language dictionaries. The results of this study describe the various juridical impacts of the legal vacuum of local audit arrangements in proving criminal cases from the aspect of legal certainty. Referring to the juridical impacts of the legal vacuum, the reform policy in the criminal procedure law is expected to be one of the guidelines for the unification or uniformity of the application of local examinations in the criminal procedure law in the future.
ASET SEBAGAI SUBJEK HUKUM DALAM UPAYA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Achmad Rilyadi Sholeh; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 3 No 6 (2024): IJHESS JUNE 2024
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.1007

Abstract

Corruption is a problem that results in high financial and economic losses in Indonesia. UNCAC has launched recommendations for countries to make arrangements regarding Non-Conviction Based asset Forfeiture (NCB) since 2003 which aims to recover maximum state financial losses. This is based on the fact that the state losses recovered are not proportional to the state financial losses incurred due to corruption crimes. The research used is normative juridical with a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and comparison with other countries. The conception of assets as legal subjects in the NCB is based on the theory of legal fiction where assets in their position as legal subjects make them seem "guilty" when the way of use or the process of obtaining them is against the law. Assets in this case are considered to be able to perform a legal act that can be accounted for as happened in several cases in the United States, the Philippines, Thailand, not to mention Indonesia. Thus, because it focuses on the "fault" of the object, asset forfeiture can still be carried out even though the object or asset has changed hands. Legislation in Indonesia has actually adopted the concept of NCB, but it does not fulfill the basic essence of the concept where the goal is to recover state losses arising from corruption maximally and quickly. Therefore, laws governing asset forfeiture must be made specifically to accommodate this, one of which is through the bill on asset forfeiture.
Tindakan Main Hakim Sendiri Yang Dilakukan Bersama-Sama dan Mengakibatkan Hilangnya Nyawa Seseorang (Studi Kasus Polres Kabupaten Malang): Unauthorized Persecution Done Jointly and Causing Death (A Case Study in Sub-Regional Police Department of the Regency of Malang) Halim, Darrell Putra; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Solehuddin
Brawijaya Law Student Journal Sarjana Ilmu Hukum, Oktober 2023
Publisher : Brawijaya Law Student Journal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract This research studies the case of unauthorized persecution done jointly and causing the death of a person in the Regency of Malang, Tumpukrenteng village, Turen. This research topic departed from the highest cases of unauthorized persecution in the area. The proscription of unauthorized persecution, however, is specified in Article 170 of the Criminal Code, while the case causing the death of a person is in Article 170 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code. Furthermore, police have introduced the stages of the report and the report-making in case of criminal conduct or violations. This indicates that some articles governing violations of social orders and the incidence of criminal cases are irrelevant in the case of unauthorized persecution collectively done by people and causing death. This research employed empirical-juridical methods and criminological-juridical approaches. Data involved primary and secondary materials, garnered from interviews and library research, and analyzed based on descriptive-qualitative methods explaining that the data were analyzed based on the contextual theory. Keywords: Death, Jointly, Unauthorized Persecution   Abstrak Pada penelitian ini penulis akan mengangkat permasalahan terkait tindakan main hakim sendiri yang dilakukan bersama-sama dan mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang di daerah Kabupaten Malang. Penelitian ini berfokus pada kasus main hakim sendiri yang dilakukan bersama-sama dan mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang di desa Tumpukrenteng, Turen, Kabupaten Malang. Pilihan tema tersebut dilandasi oleh Kabupaten Malang dinobatkan sebagai provinsi dengan jumlah tertinggi atas tindakan main hakim sendiri yang mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang diantara Provinsi Malang Raya lainnya. Aturan tentang larangan Tindakan main hakim sendiri secara tidak langsung telah diejawantahkan dalam pasal 170 KUHP, dan yang mengakibatkan hilangnya nyawa seseorang diatur dalam pasal 170 ayat 2 KUHP. Terlepas dari itu kepolisian sendiri telah melakukan sosialisasi mengenai tahap-tahap pelaporan serta pembuatan laporan apabila terjadi kejatan atau penggaran. Maka dari itu terdapat ketimpangan pasal yang sudah mengatur mengenai kejahatan terhadap ketertiban umum dengan tingginya angka kejahatan terhadap ketertiban umum yakni tindakan main hakim sendiri yang dilakukan secara bersama- sama dan sampai menghilangkan nyawa seseorang. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan yuridis kriminologis. Sumber data yang digunakan yaitu data primer yang didukung oleh data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Teknik analisis data melalui deskriptif kualitatif dengan menjelaskaskan data primer yang didapat serta dianalis menggunakan teori yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan tersebut. Kata Kunci: Bersama-sama, Hilangnya Nyawa Seseorang, Main Hakim Sendiri
Kedudukan Surat Keputusan Bersama sebagai Pedoman Implementasi Pasal Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik dalam UU ITE Ramadhani, Defi Sri Sunardi; Noerdajasakti, Setiawan; Sulistio, Faizin
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 7, No 2 (2022): Juli 2022
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (359.84 KB) | DOI: 10.17977/um019v7i2p375-383

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the guidelines for implementing Article 27 paragraph (3) of Electronic Transaction and Information Law and the joint decree's legal standing as guidelines for implementing the law on information and electronic transactions. This study utilized a normative juridical method with a historical approach, a conceptual approach, and a statutory approach. The implementation of Article 27 paragraph (3) of Law Number 11 of 2008 in conjunction with Law Number 19 of 2016 was based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 50/PUU-VI/2008 that referred to Article 310, Article 311, and Article 315 of the Indonesian Criminal Act. Although it was not explicitly stated in Article 7 paragraph (1) of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Legislation, the joint decree as guidelines for implementing the law on information and electronic transactions had the same position and binding legal force as the laws and regulations.
Child Passenger Safety in Indonesia: An Analysis of the Need for Specific Seat Belt Regulations Ariyanto, Oos; Noerdajasakti , Setiawan; Sulistio , Faizin
Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/invest.v4i2.10045

Abstract

Current Indonesian road safety laws, particularly Law No. 22 of 2009 on Traffic and Road Transport, lack specific provisions for the use of child restraint systems, which significantly reduces child passenger safety. Unlike many developed countries with strict regulations that mandate child-specific safety equipment, Indonesian regulations currently mandate only standard seatbelts designed for adults. This inadequacy poses a substantial risk to children because of their physical vulnerability. This study examines the urgency of specific regulations regarding child safety restraints for child passengers in Indonesia. This research employs a normative legal approach to analyze Indonesia's existing legislation alongside international practices. The findings underscore those countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia have effectively lowered child accident rates through mandatory child safety restraints and public awareness campaigns. The study concludes that adopting similar practices in Indonesia could enhance child passenger safety, reduce injury rates, and improve overall road safety for young passengers. The implementation of specific child restraint laws and public awareness initiatives are recommended to ensure comprehensive legal protection for child passengers in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid Abdul Madjid Abdul Madjid Abdul Madjid Abdul Majid Achmad Rilyadi Sholeh Ahmad Siboy Al Fikri, Badrus Zaman Ansori, Ansori Aria Perkasa Utama Ariyanto, Oos Arrum Maryana Azna Abrory Wardana Bambang Sugiri Bodro Aji Negoro Budimansyah David Mangaraja Lumban Batu Dewi Setyowati Fachrizal Afandi Fadel Ilato Fadhila, Kharisma Wulan Faizin Sulistio Faizin Sulistio Faizin Sulistio Fatwa Azis Wicaksono Fransisco, Fransisco G. Gunawan Geraldo Gracelo Mario Situmeang hakim, Ikhwanulhakim Halim, Darrell Putra Herman Suryokumoro Heru Cahjono Heru Cahjono Hidayat, Jeffarel Intan Khoirun Nisa' Iwan Permadi Jessyca Fatmawaty Hutagalung Joko Cahyono Kiki Kristanto Kristanto, Kiki Kurniaty, Rika Laksono Trisnantoro Lucky Endrawati Milda Istiqomah Milda Istiqomah Mugopal, Undang Muhammad Hanif Ramadhan Muhammad Najih Vargholy Muslim, Shohib Nugraha Ardi Setiawan Nur Chanifah Nurini Aprilianda Pakpahan, Alman P. Parama Artha, Krisna Adi Prija Djatmika Prija Djatmika Prija Djatmika Prija Djatmika Putri Carera Santi Romauli Simamora Rachmad Safa’at Ramadhani, Defi Sri Sunardi Rieya Aprianti Satriya Nugraha Sholeh, Achmad Rilyadi Solehuddin Solehudin Sugiri, Bambang Sugiri, Bambang Sulistio , Faizin Tubagus Heru Dharma Wijaya Yuliati Yuliati Zaldi Nasrudin Zhafirah, Carissa Tita