Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Parents' Understanding of the Safety and Comfort in Using Gadgets for Children Anindya Apriliyanti Pravitasari; Mulya Nurmansyah Ardisasmita; Fajar Indrayatna; Intan Nurma Yulita; Triyani Hendrawati; Gumgum Darmawan
REKA ELKOMIKA: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol 4, No 2 (2023): REKA ELKOMIKA
Publisher : Institut Teknologi Nasional, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26760/rekaelkomika.v4i2.151-160

Abstract

The utilization of technology among children has significantly increased since the outbreak of the Covid 19 pandemic. Therefore, the use of gadgets among children requires special attention from parents, since under incorrect ergonomic circumstances, it could endanger the health of children. This webinar was designed with parents in mind, giving them valuable information on how to use kid-friendly technology. Additionally, a pre- and post-test was assigned to evaluate parents’ knowledge about ergonomic conditions (safety and comfort) when using gadgets, both before and after the webinar. The results indicated a substantial increasement in parental knowledge among the webinar participants as well as the heightened desire and willingness to apply the right ergonomic conditions for their children’s gadget use at home.
Development of Disability Inclusion Capacity Instrument for Community Cadres: Rasch Model Analysis Daniel Francis Hartopo; Lukman Hilfi; Mulya Nurmansyah Ardisasmita
Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Masyarakat Bidang Kesehatan (Abdigermas) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Bidang Kesehatan (Abdigermas)
Publisher : CV Media Inti Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58723/abdigermas.v3i2.452

Abstract

Adding to their relatively high number, people with disabilities in Indonesia also face various challenges. Given such high prevalence, cadres have an important role in promoting disability inclusion. It is crucial to measure the level of knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of these cadres regarding disability inclusion, for example, by using an instrument. To test the validity and reliability of such an instrument, statistical analysis methods like the Rasch Model Analysis are applicable due to their advantages. This study evaluates the construct validity of the Hilfi & Kaylia Disability Inclusiveness Perception instrument among health cadres. The study used a cross-sectional design using secondary data from the Disability Inclusion Capacity instrument administered to 709 cadres residing in Bandung City, Indonesia, from July to December 2024. Construct validity was analyzed using the Rasch model. Data from 626 participants who met the criteria showed that the average outfit mean-square (MnSq) for the 25-item version of the instrument met Rasch model expectations (0.92). However, item J1 was identified as a misfitting item (outfit MnSq > 1.4 and outfit Z-standard (ZSTD) > 2) across all three versions of the instrument. The explained variance was found to be 44.1%. Reliability and separation index results were excellent, with Cronbach’s alpha at 0.96 and separation index above 2. However, category response functioning and targeting did not fully meet Rasch model expectations. Nonetheless, it can be concluded that the Hilfi & Kaylia Disability Inclusiveness Perception Instrument has acceptable construct validity with the sample of health cadres in Bandung City, Indonesia.
Construct Validity of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10) Instrument in the Elderly with Disabilities: Rasch Model Analysis Lukman Hilfi; Mulya Nurmansyah Ardisasmita; Fauzura Nuril Mahra
Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Masyarakat Bidang Kesehatan (Abdigermas) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Bidang Kesehatan (Abdigermas)
Publisher : CV Media Inti Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58723/abdigermas.v3i3.453

Abstract

Aging contributes to functional decline and heightened psychological distress that affects the older adults’ quality of life. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the 10-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10) for assessing psychological distress, however the Classical Test Theory (CTT)-based evaluation method has limitations. Item Response Theory (IRT), specifically the Rasch model, offers a more accurate method for measuring the instrument’ validity and reliability. This study examined the construct validity of the K-10 Indonesian version in older adults with disabilities. A cross-sectional method and secondary data from 321 elderly individuals (≥60 years) with disabilities in Bandung City, Indonesia, were used between August and February 2025. The Instrument’s construct validity of was analyzed by performing the Rasch model. A total of 315 responses were eligible for analysis. The K-10 showed an overall fit to the Rasch model (mean outfit MnSq = 1.03±0.27). Item C10 (“feel worthless”) was identified as misfitting (outfit MnSq >1.4; ZSTD >2), although no factor bias was detected. The explained variance reached 54.10%. Reliability indicators were strong, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.89 and a person separation index above 2. However, category functioning and targeting did not fully meet Rasch expectations. The correlation between K-10 and WHODAS 2.0 showed a moderate positive relationship, though it did not reach the criterion for convergent validity (r >0.6).  The Indonesian version of the K-10 has acceptable construct validity in a sample of older adults with disabilities in Bandung City, Indonesia.