Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJ3PE Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Syaharie Jaang
Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Berdasarkan Prinsip Keadilan Syaharie Jaang
Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Vol 2 No 05 (2023): Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/jhhws.v2i05.303

Abstract

Perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen merupakan kewajiban yang harus dilaksanakan oleh negara sebagai hak konstitusional warga negara untuk memperoleh perlindungan hukum, kepastian hukum dan keadilan. Tanpa perlindungan hukum, kepastian dan keadilan bagi konsumen dapat menimbulkan konflik hukum antara konsumen dan produsen, karena ada pihak yang merasa dirugikan. Produsen dan konsumen masing-masing memiliki hak dan kewajiban dalam melakukan transaksi jual beli atau transaksi lainnya, terkadang produsen suka melakukan pelanggaran dan kecurangan. Hal ini terjadi, karena kurangnya penegakan hukum oleh aparat penegak hukum. Pancasila sebagai ideologi bangsa dan sebagai dasar negara menjabarkan keadilan sosial bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia. keadilan dimaksudkan untuk dilaksanakan secara universal termasuk menerapkan keadilan untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum dan rasa aman bagi konsumen. Salah satu tujuan negara adalah untuk mencapai kesejahteraan bagi seluruh rakyat Indonesia, salah satu bentuk nyata mewujudkan kemakmuran adalah dengan memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen. Konsumen dan produsen dalam transaksi jual beli diawali dengan kesepakatan, dimana kesepakatan tersebut merupakan bentuk keadilan, karena dalam jual beli tidak mungkin ada paksaan, kecuali jual beli dibangun dari niat curang dan tujuan manipulatif. Keadilan antara konsumen dan produsen akan terwujud jika kedua belah pihak menanamkan kejujuran dan takut akan sanksi yang akan datang dari Allah Subhanahu wa ta'ala di akhirat nanti.
ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERDATA DIPENGADILAN Jaidun Jaidun; Syaharie Jaang
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 16 No. 2 (2024): Agustus
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v16i2.2997

Abstract

Settlement of civil disputes through a judge mediator is regulated in Article 1 paragraph (2) of the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation number 1 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Mediation in Court which states that a mediator is a Judge or other party who has a Mediator Certificate as a neutral party to assist the Parties in the negotiation process to seek various possibilities for resolving disputes without having to make a decision or force a resolution. The parties can use Alternative Dispute Resolution to reach a mutually beneficial agreement. The research used is non-doctrinal legal research, or can also be called research about law. The data used is primary data, namely data obtained directly from research subjects such as interviews. Apart from that, secondary data comes from statutory regulations and literature. Then the data obtained was analyzed qualitatively. The parties use the services of a certified mediator, because this is influenced by 2 factors, namely: (1) They do not want to pay the costs of hiring a certified mediator (2) There are no provisions governing the obligations of the parties to use a certified mediator. The failure of the peace agreement between the parties was caused by 2 factors, namely: (1) Having a strong desire to take the litigation route. (2) It is difficult to entrust the resolution of legal conflicts to a mediator. (3) Still holding a grudge that is difficult to reconcile. Mediators provide convenience and open access to information for the parties to achieve peace. Obstacles to peaceful efforts in court are (1) The parties have a strong desire to resolve civil conflicts through litigation (court). (2) The parties find it difficult to trust the mediator to resolve their conflict. (3) Both parties still hold grudges that are difficult to reconcile
Pelanggaran Etika Dan Profesi Hukum Dalam Kasus Suap Eks Ketua Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 70/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN.Jkt.Pst) Ratihpuspita Krisnowo; Syaharie Jaang
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): Februari
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v18i1.3913

Abstract

The effectiveness of law enforcement is shaped not only by statutory provisions but also by the moral integrity and ethical accountability of those entrusted with judicial authority. The bribery case involving the former Head of the South Jakarta District Court, adjudicated under Decision Number 70/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN.Jkt.Pst and subsequently affirmed with an increased sentence in Appeal Decision Number 4/PID.SUS-TPK/2026/PT DKI, illustrates a grave breach of both anti-corruption law and judicial ethical standards. This study draws upon Soerjono Soekanto’s law enforcement theory, deterrence theory, and the concept of institutional integrity to examine the case. Employing normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the analysis is based on primary legal sources, including anti-corruption statutes, the Judicial Power Act, the Code of Judicial Ethics, and relevant court rulings, complemented by doctrinal and scholarly references. The findings indicate that criminal prosecution serves not only as a punitive response but also as a structural corrective mechanism against corruption within the judiciary. The appellate court’s decision to enhance the sentence, accompanied by fines and restitution, reflects proportionality in sentencing and reinforces both general and specific deterrence. Moreover, ethical misconduct by judges erodes institutional credibility and weakens public confidence in the justice system. The study concludes that the integration of criminal liability and ethical enforcement is essential to restoring judicial legitimacy and strengthening preventive oversight within the judicial framework.
Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara dalam Pemilu di Samarinda: Analisis Hukum dan Pengawasan Andi Mardatila; Syaharie Ja’ang
International Journal of Politic, Public Policy and Environmental Issues Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Wadah Inovasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53622/ij3pei.v4i2.381

Abstract

This study examines the legal analysis of the neutrality of State Civil Apparatus (ASN) in Samarinda during the implementation of the General Election. The research focuses on the legal framework governing ASN neutrality, the challenges faced by oversight bodies in enforcing these regulations, and the implications for democratic processes. The findings reveal that while legal provisions such as Law No. 20 of 2023 on ASN and Law No. 7 of 2017 on General Elections provide a strong foundation for neutrality, practical challenges including bureaucratic delays, limited authority of oversight bodies, and political interference hinder effective enforcement. Recommendations include strengthening inter-institutional coordination, enhancing public awareness, and ensuring the independence of oversight mechanisms to promote fair and transparent elections.
Co-Authors Andi Mardatila Jaidun Ratihpuspita Krisnowo