Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal WIMAYA: Interdisciplinary Journal of International Affairs Jurnal Keamanan Nasional
Syasya Yuania Fadila Mas'udi
University of Muhammadiyah Malang
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Teori Perang vs Teori Perang yang Adil: Sebuah Studi Perbandingan (pp. 139-154) Syasya Yuania Fadila Mas'udi
JURNAL KEAMANAN NASIONAL Vol 9 No 1 (2023): Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, Volume IX, No. 1, Juli 2023
Publisher : Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to see whether just war does exist, or whether the existence of the theory is only to satisfy moral principles by those who are concerned with the ethics of war. As we know that war is destructive for whatever the reason. Although states do not wage war anymore, it does not mean that the world is safe from war. Therefore, just war theory is intended to make war justifiable, that there are justifiable reasons for a state to declare war. In answering the research question whether just war exists, the researcher compared the just war theory with the theory of war. The research method that used is qualitative, comparative study, while the type of research used in this research is descriptive research and data collection techniques are carried out using literature study method. The results showed that basically the theory of war and the just war theory are basically contradictory to each other so that in practice war will never be just. Keywords: ethics of war, just war theory, theory of war
ASEAN’s Leadership Capacity as the Heart of the Indo-Pacific Eva Ermylina; Syasya Yuania Fadila Mas'udi
WIMAYA Vol. 7 No. 01 (2026)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL VETERAN JAWA TIMUR

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33005/wimaya.v7i01.378

Abstract

Amid intensifying great power competition, the Indo-Pacific concept has emerged as a crucial geopolitical framework that expands traditional constructs of the Asia-Pacific. As major powers such as the United States, Japan, India, and Australia develop Indo-Pacific strategies to counter China's growing influence, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) seeks to maintain regional stability and relevance through the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP). Based on the principle of ASEAN Centrality, the AOIP reflects ASEAN's commitment to an inclusive and rules-based regional order and its ambition to be a key architect of Indo-Pacific cooperation. This paper examines ASEAN's leadership using the leadership-institution model, which distinguishes between ideational leadership—grounded in ideas, norms, and identity building—and executive leadership—rooted in material capabilities and institutional authority. The findings highlight ASEAN's strong ideational leadership through its ability to uphold shared principles and facilitate dialogue among diverse actors, despite lacking binding enforcement authority. However, ASEAN's executive leadership remains hampered by weak collective military capacity, economic disparities among member states, and consensus-based decision-making, which often results in non-binding outcomes. Overall, this study demonstrates that while ASEAN plays a crucial role in promoting inclusivity and sustaining dialogue, significant challenges remain in translating its centrality into decisive institutional leadership within the evolving Indo-Pacific architecture.
Co-Authors Eva Ermylina