Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Penyuluhan Hukum Pidana Penyalahgunaan Media Sosial di Desa Dalihan Natolu Kecamatan Silaen Kabupaten Toba Sumatera Utara Lonna Yohanes Lengkong; Nanin Koeswidi Astuti; Inri Januar; Andree Washington H
BANTENESE : JURNAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Bantenese : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Pusat Studi Sosial dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Fisipkum Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ps2pm.v5i1.6756

Abstract

Penyalahgunaan media sosial selama masa pandemi covid-19 rentang waktu 2020-2021 sangat marak di berbagai media sosial, karena banyak masyarakat dari berbagai usia yang menggunakan media sosial sebagai sarana di dalam pertukaran informasi, tanpa menyadari tindakan mengklik tersbut dilarang oleh peraturan perundang-undangan. Pengabdian kepada masyarakat (PKM) di Desa Dalihan Natolu, Kecamatan Silaen, Kabupaten Toba, Sumatera Utara dilakukan sebagai bentuk pengabdian kepada masyarakat (PKM) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia dalam rangka program pemberdayaan masyarakat serta meningkatkan solidaritas dan kepedulian kepada kondisi masyarakat, khususnya yang membutuhkan bantuan hukum, khususnya di masyarakat Desa yang berada jauh dari kota besar. FH UKI melakukan penyuluhan hukum tentang sanksi pidana bagi penyalahgunaan media sosial. PKM dilaksanakan dengan cara ceramah, diskusi, tanya jawab serta dilakukan evaluasi melalui penyebaran kuesioner kepada peserta. Pengabdian dilaksanakan oleh tim dosen FH UKI yang berkompeten di bidang hukum pidana dan telematika. Hasil dari PKM penyuluhan hukum penyalahgunaan media sosial memberikan hasil sebagai meningkatnya pengetahuan dan pemahaman warga di Desa Dalihan Natolu, Kecamatan Silaen, Kabupaten Toba, Sumatera Utara yang dialami mereka. Kata Kunci: penyalahgunaan medias sosial, media sosial, ancaman pidana media sosial
ANALISA PUTUSAN HAKIM TERHADAP PENGEMUDI KENDARAAN BERMOTOR YANG KARENA KELALAIANNYA MENGAKIBATKAN ORANG LAIN MENINGGAL DUNIA Yosephine Elizabeth; Inri Januar; Lonna Yohanes Lengkong
Honeste Vivere Vol 33 No 2 (2023): July
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55809/hv.v33i2.197

Abstract

Traffic Accident is an incident on the streets that happened out of nowhere that can cause damage, injuries, and even death. The research problem of this thesis are to know the criminal liability of the act of Negligence Caused Death in Indonesian’s Law and the application of its criminal liability towards someone’s behavior of negligence caused death in the Medan District Court Verdict No: 3569/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Mdn). The research method that is used by the author is the method of normative juridical which uses case approach and statute approach. The data sources that is used by the author is the secondary data in which are primary materials, secondary materials, and tertiary material. For the outcome, the author concluded that the Prosecutors can’t proof the Defendant actions in details. In the Medan District Court Verdict No: 3569/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Mdn, there is nothing that can be use a proof or something that can be convincing enough to proof that the Defendant is indeed driven the Vehicle above the Speed Limit. So because of that, the Judges should’ve made the verdict as a free verdict.
PELAKSANAAN PRESTASI DALAM KEADAAN MEMAKSA YANG TERJADI PADA MASA PANDEMIK Inri Januar
to-ra Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): Agustus
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33541/JtVol5Iss2pp102

Abstract

Covid 19 virus is becoming a pandemic throughout the world including Indonesia, therefore was born legislation that was deemed necessary to limit activities outside the home in order to reduce the spread of the virus. As a result, many debtors cannot carry out their obligations on the grounds of forced conditions. Forceful situation due to the existence of laws and regulations is the reason for the non implementation of debtor obligations, this is justified according to law. To be determined in a forceful condition other than an agreement, the court can provide its judgment. Key word: Pandemic, Overmacht, Regulation.
The Missing Asset Recovery Practitioner: Comparative Lessons for Indonesia’s Asset Forfeiture Law Johannes Ronald Elyeser Roparulian Hutagalung; Hulman Panjaitan; Tomson Situmeang; Inri Januar
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i3.158

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s Draft Asset Forfeiture Law authorizes the Attorney General’s Body for Asset Recovery (BPA) to trace, manage, and liquidate criminal assets. Despite generating Rp19.6 trillion in non-tax state revenue in 2025 under Article 30A of Law No. 11 of 2021, the draft’s three proposed practitioner categories—Asset Recovery Prosecutor, Government Assessor Official, and Evidence Custodian—lack functional-position status under Law No. 20 of 2023. The Civil Curator under PermenPAN-RB No. 15 of 2020 remains an uncertain institutional analogue. Objective: This study assesses whether the Civil Curator framework accommodates the pro justitia functions of the BPA and identifies relevant comparative lessons from the United States, Australia, France, and the United Kingdom. Methods: Using a qualitative comparative socio-legal approach, this study examines legislation, the Draft Law, the BPHN Academic Paper, and the BPA’s 2026 institutional position paper. Statutory, conceptual, and comparative analyses apply Ambtenleer, Gulick’s specialization theory, and Friedman’s legal-system framework to evaluate institutional mandates, investigative and custodial roles, functional positions, and accountability mechanisms. Results: The Civil Curator is designed for reactive, court-ordered civil functions under the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, rendering it structurally incompatible with the BPA’s proactive asset recovery mandate. All four comparator jurisdictions separate investigative functions from custodial and asset management responsibilities. Conclusion: The separation of investigative and curatorship functions is an institutional necessity. The Draft Law should include a lex specialis provision establishing Asset Recovery Practitioner functional positions within the Attorney General’s Office to address this rechtsleemte.