Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Hak Cipta Dalam Pelaksanaan Ibadah Daring Bagi Guru Sekolah Minggu di Cikarang Sujana Donandi. S
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Borneo Vol 7, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Borneo Tarakan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35334/jpmb.v7i1.2964

Abstract

Kesadaran Hukum Hak Cipta pada Guru Sekolah Minggu di Cikarang dalam menjalankan ibadah daring masih sangat rendah. Mayoritas Guru Sekolah Minggu tidak mempertimbangkan mengenai Hak Cipta, padahal mereka sering menggunakan karya ciptaan pihak lain dalam melaksanakan ibadah daring. Rendahnya kesadaran Hukum Hak Cipta tentu akan mempengaruhi tingkat penegakan Hukum Hak Cipta. Oleh karena itu, Guru Sekolah Minggu perlu untuk dibekali dengan literasi dan edukasi mengenai Hak Cipta. Pengabdian ini dijalankan melalui sebuah penyuluhan daring yang diikuti oleh perwakilan para sekolah minggu di Cikarang. Pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa rendahnya kesadaran Hukum Hak Cipta telah menyebabkan munculnya masalah hukum yang dihadapi Guru Sekolah Minggu saat menggunakan kreasi pihak lain dalam ibadah daring baik dalam bentuk peringatan dari youtube ataupun pihak yang mengklaim sebagai pemilik kreasi tersebut. Melalui penyuluhan yang diikuti, Guru Sekolah Minggu menyatakan menjadi lebih paham mengenai aspek hukum Hak Cipta  dan menjadi lebih sadar serta berhati-hati dalam menggunakan karya pihak lain dalam pelaksanaan ibadah daring yang dijalankan. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa penyuluhan hukum telah membawa dampak positif karena kesadaran Guru Sekolah Minggu telah meningkat dalam menghargai Hak Ekonomi dan Hak Moral atas ciptaan yang dimiliki oleh pihak lain.
PERBANDINGAN SUBSTANSIAL MENGENAI DEFINISI DAN RUANG LINGKUP MEREK ANTARA UNDANG-UNDANG MEREK 2001 DAN 2016 Sujana Donandi. S
Problematika Hukum Vol 4, No 2: July 2018
Publisher : President University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33021/ph.v4i2.1722

Abstract

In this era of globalization and improving technology, the law of trademark is expected to adapt the society factual needs, especially in giving the boundary of definition and scope of trademark. Trademark regulation in Indonesia was previously govermed in Law Number 15 Year 2001 which has been revised by Law Number 20 Year 2016 concerning Trademark and Geographical Indication. This new law is expected to present updates on values which could reach the business practice nowadays compare to the old law. This research aims to do a substantial comparison regarding definition and scope of trademark between trademark law 2001 and 2016. This research is done using normative legal research method through comparison approach. The result shows that the definition of trademark has improved from law 2001 to 2016 by the existence of a more specific definition on trademark by adding provision regarding the shape of trademark both in two dimension and/or three dimension, voices, and hologram. Nevertheless, this definition does not clearly govern on trademark that particularly used in internet. Moreover, the trademark classification has no change that trademarks are still divided into trading trademark, service trademark, and collective trademark. Legal sytem of trademark protection is also remain the same, using the constitutive system. Regarding the trademark the can not be registered and the rejected application also has no significant change, except the additional arrangement on the trademark that can not be registered which is now including the trademark which contains element that can cause misleading to the society concerning on the origin, quality, type, size, classification, objective of the goods and or service applied, or for it is similar to names of protected plant variety for the same types of goods and or service, as well as contains information which is not appropriate to the quality, function, or benefits of the produced goods and or services.