p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.168
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal INJURLENS
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Corporate Responsibility For Criminal Actions Of Song Copyright Under The 28 Law Of 2014 Ade Putera; Sunardi Sunardi; Hanafi Arief
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.50

Abstract

Research entitled "Corporate Responsibility for Crime of Song Copyright According to Law Number 28 of 2014" aims to analyze how copyright crimes are regulated in Indonesian positive law and to analyze corporate responsibility for copyright infringement according to the Copyright Law Number 28 of 2014. This research is normative legal research, which examines laws and regulations in a coherent legal system and unwritten legal values ??that live in society, which are related to corporate responsibility for copyright infringement according to the law 28 of 2014. The results of the study stated that copyright crimes, including song copyrights, are regulated in the Copyright Act as part of Indonesian positive law. Article 112 of the Copyright Law Number 28 of 2014 states that everyone who without rights commits the acts referred to in Article 7 paragraph (3) and/or Article 52 for commercial use, shall be punished with imprisonment for a maximum of 2 (two) years and/or a maximum fine of 300,000,000.00 (three hundred million rupiah). Because legal entities are equated with people, legal entities that commit criminal copyright infringements can also be punished under this article as a form of responsibility. Criminal acts by Corporations are regulated in Article 3 of MA RI Regulation 13/2016 which are criminal acts committed by people based on work relationships, or based on other relationships, both individually and jointly acting for and on behalf of Corporations inside and outside Corporate Environment.
Juridical Review of Elections Dispute Settlement in Indonesia Akhmad Zaki Yamani; Sunardi Sunardi; Hanafi Arief
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v4i1.52

Abstract

The research on “Juridical Review of Election Dispute Resolution in Indonesia” aims to describe the mechanism of election dispute resolution in Indonesia, and analyze the current weaknesses of election dispute resolution in Indonesia. This is a normative legal research, which examines laws and regulations in an Indonesian legal system that are coherent with written legal values, especially those related to election dispute resolution in Indonesia. The results of the study state that election settlement mechanisms are important to protect the rights of citizens and help determine whether elections are truly a reflection of the will of their citizens, as well as for elections to be considered credible, voters and election contestants must have access to effective election dispute resolution mechanisms. independent, fair, accessible and effective. Weaknesses in the settlement of election disputes that have been carried out so far have not fulfilled a sense of justice because dispute resolution is carried out through the Constitutional Court based on Article 24 C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, whose authority is then elaborated in Article 10 paragraph (1) of Law (UU) Number 24 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court as amended by Law Number 8 of 2011 (UU MK). Dispute resolution through the Constitutional Court in Jakarta is felt to be very burdensome for election participants because it is not in accordance with the principle of a cheap, fast and efficient trial. Election dispute settlement, which has been carried out for a maximum of 7 (seven) days, begins with the stages of receiving reports, researching, clarifying, conducting studies, and making decisions. The very limited completion time, which is a maximum of 7 (seven) days, can create a sense of injustice for justice seekers, because this short process can lead to haste in the examination which in turn creates a feeling of insecurity.
Status of the Verbalish Witness Recognition to Violence Against Suspects as a Tool of Evidence Faizal Rahman; Sunardi Sunardi; Hanafi Arief
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v4i1.53

Abstract

In the examination of a criminal case trial requires several pieces of evidence as contained in the Criminal Procedure Code called KUHAP, such as: witness statements, expert statements, letters, instructions, and statements of the accused. Verbalized witnesses are not included in the KUHAP, but they often occur in criminal justice practices. This study aims to find out how the position of evidence in Indonesian criminal law and how verbal witness confessions can be used as evidence of criminal acts of mistreatment of suspects. This research is descriptive in nature, with a statutory approach, primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials and qualitative analysis is carried out systematically in order to obtain answers to problems, Witness statements are legal evidence as regulated in Article 184 paragraph (1) of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning called KUHAP. A verbal witness is an investigative witness who is presented by a judge in a trial because the defendant withdraws the Minutes of Examination called BAP. The presence of this verbal witness was to prove the testimony of the defendant who said that during the investigation the defendant was under pressure or coercion. Verbal witness statements can be used as a judge's consideration in accepting the reasons for revocation of the  BAP carried out by the defendant and the judge's considerations in making a decision. Moreover, verbal witness testimony was taken in a trial.
Status Of Pretrial Institutions In Indonesian Criminal Law Famda Egga Prasnada; Sunardi Sunardi; Moh. Muhibbin
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.54

Abstract

This study aims to describe the position of pretrial institutions in the study of criminal law in Indonesia and to analyze the implementation of pretrial institutions as legal remedies for suspects in obtaining justice at the level of investigation and prosecution. This is a normative legal research, which examines statutory regulations in a coherent legal system and unwritten legal values ??that live in society, which are related to the suspect's efforts to obtain justice through the Pretrial Institution. The results of the study state that pretrial is one of the new institutions introduced since the existence of Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code in the midst of law enforcement life. Pretrial Institution arrangements in the Criminal Procedure Code are listed in Article 1 point 10, Chapter X Part One from Article 77 to Article 83. The position of the Judicial Institution in Indonesian positive law is part of the criminal justice system, as well as being part of law enforcement in abstracto or in concreto. In practice, pretrial is usually carried out in a rule of law country like Indonesia as long as the investigation process is carried out based on the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, although not all pretrial decisions are won by the suspect or the party submitting them. In the process of pretrial examination hearings, of course, the facts, both juridical and material facts, will be considered.
Detention Of Suspects Under The Indonesian Criminal Law Anzhari Anzhari; Sunardi Sunardi; Moh. Muhibbin
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): October Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i2.56

Abstract

The research aims to describe the provisions of Indonesian criminal law regarding the detention of suspects and to analyze the legal protection of suspects during detention in terms of Indonesian criminal law. This research is a normative legal research, which examines laws and regulations in a coherent legal system and legal values ??related to the detention of suspects in the study of Indonesian criminal law. The results of the study show that the provisions for detaining suspects are regulated in Article 1 point 21 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Criminal Procedure. While in detention, suspects can exercise their rights in accordance with articles 50 to 68 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).l protection is always associated with the concept of rechtstaat or the concept of the Rule of Law because the birth of these concepts cannot be separated from the desire to provide recognition and protection of human rights. A suspect has rights at the time of detention that are guaranteed by law, such as the right to receive and read a Detention Warrant or a Judge's Order which lists the identity of the suspect or defendant and states the reasons for the detention and a brief description of the crime case being suspected or charged and the place where he is being detained in accordance with Article 21 paragraph (2) Criminal Procedure Code.