Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ius Constituendum Sociological Jurisprudence Journal
Rendy Airlangga
Universitas Airlangga
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Ius Constituendum Diversi Terhadap Pengulangan Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Rendy Airlangga; Kyagus Ramadhani; Yuvina Ariestanti; Adam Ardiansyah Ramadhan
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol 8, No 2 (2023): JUNE
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v8i2.7055

Abstract

This research aims to know the diversion concept related to recidivism system for a criminal that committed by underage person. This thing has been happened because there is differential meaning between recidivism concept in Juvenile Criminal Justice System and Criminal Law Code. Criminal Law Code interpreted recidivism as the crime that re-committed by person and that crime is legally binding. Whereas Juvenile Criminal Justice System  interpreted prohibition  of the application of diversion for a crime that has been committed by underage person. The urgent things about this research focused on the problem where a crime has been already committed by underage person and that crime has been finished by diversion system, does this can be categorized that it can not get diversion process again. This research is using juridical normative method which is studied prescriptively with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Criminalization of children as recidivist in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System currently has no provisions governing criminal sanctions against children who commit repeated crimes (recidivism), both contained in the Criminal Code and in the Law of The Juvenile Criminal Justice System. Diversion which is mandated by Law No. 11 of 2012 is implemented based on the foundation of restorative justice which is very concerned about children’s rights. Lastly this research expected can be considered in trying to determine recidivism concept in integrated criminal system. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui konsep diversi berkaitan dengan sistem residivisme pada anak yang menjadi pelaku tindak pidana di Indonesia. Hal ini dikarenakan konsep residivisme di UU SPPA dan KUHP memiliki perbedaan makna. Di KUHP menafsirkan residivisme sebagai sebuah perbuatan tindak pidana yang dilakukan kembali oleh seseorang yang telah dijatuhi hukuman pidana dengan memiliki kekuatan hukum tetap (Inchracht). Sedangkan dalam UU SPPA mengenal konsep pelarangan penerapan diversi terhadap anak yang telah melakukan tindak pidana. Urgensi permasalahan ini dititikberatkan pada permasalahan dimana anak yang telah melakukan tindak pidana kemudian diselesaikan secara diversi apakah kemudian dikategorikan tidak dapat menerima proses diversi lagi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yang dikaji secara preskriptif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Pemidanaan terhadap anak sebagai residivis dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak saat ini masih belum terdapat pengaturan yang mengatur tentang sanksi pidana terhadap anak yang melakukan pengulangan tindak pidana (recidive), baik yang terkandung di dalam KUHP maupun di dalam Undang Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Diversi yang diamanatkan oleh Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 diimplementasikan berdasarkan landasan restorative justice yang sangat memperhatikan hak-hak anak. Sehingga pada akhirnya penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi pertimbangan dalam menentukan konsep residivis di dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang terpadu.
Renewal of Law Number 9 of 1961 Concerning Collection of Money or Object Rendy Airlangga; Bertha Bernessa Sacharissa; Diana Septaviana
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/scj.7.1.2024.45-54

Abstract

Indonesia consists of many existing communities, so it does not rule out the possibility of problems related to people's welfare. In order to overcome the social welfare that occurs, a philanthropic approach can be used, namely the love of humanity, in Indonesia philanthropic activities are regulated in Law Number 9 of 1961 concerning Collection of Money or Object, but over time the Act is deemed obsolete and necessary. to carry out reforms by paying attention to regulatory aspects related to licensing, fines, and supported by the existence of an independent institution that is accountable so that with the renewal of the Law it is hoped that in terms of philanthropic activities, it can play a greater role in improving the welfare of the community. The research in this study used a prescriptive normative research method. This study will describe the urgency of legal reform from Law Number 9 of 1961 concerning Collection of Money or Object and provide an overview of legal reform for philanthropy regulations in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Adam Ardiansyah Ramadhan Bertha Bernessa Sacharissa Diana Septaviana Kyagus Ramadhani Yuvina Ariestanti