Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jaqfi : Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Jurnal Penelitian Medan Agama
Amir Sahidin
STAI Darul Qalam, Tangerang
Religion Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Konsep Epistemologi Perspektif Al-Kindi: Modifikasi Epistemologi Yunani Amir Sahidin; Abdurahim Abdurahim
Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Vol 8, No 1 (2023): JAQFI VOL.8 NO. 1, 2023
Publisher : Jurusan Aqidah dan Filsafat Islam Universitas Negri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jaqfi.v8i1.22257

Abstract

Al-Kindi was the first Arab thinker who paid great attention to epistemology. Although al-Kindi adopted many of the epistemological theories of earlier Greek philosophers, al-Kindi's epistemology has fundamental differences and more values due to his belief in Islamic principles. Based on that, this research will discuss the epistemological concept of al-Kindi's perspective. Through a library research study with a descriptive-analytical approach, it can be concluded, first: al-Kindi's epistemological concept is different from the epistemological concept of the Greek philosophers who negate the role of revelation in it. Second, al-Kindi is very concerned with 'illah or the cause of the nature of a science, which includes material, formal, efficient and final causes, all of which begin and end in the cause of al-haq or God. Third, there are three sources of al-Kindi's knowledge, namely the five senses, rational and divine knowledge which is the highest science.
Telaah Atas Ijtihad Umar Bin Khaṭṭab Perspektif Maqāṣid Al-Syarī'ah Amir Sahidin
Jurnal Penelitian Medan Agama MEDAN AGAMA, VOL. 14, NO. 1, JUNI 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58836/jpma.v14i1.16553

Abstract

In the course of Islamic law, there were several issues of muamalat that were not found in law at the time of the Prophet, so the companions made ijtihad to find them. In fact, not infrequently the laws set by the companions seemed to contradict the teachings of the Prophet. As ijtihad was carried out by Umar bin Khaṭṭab in several ways such as: aborting the had punishment for adulterers, aborting the punishment for cutting off the hands of thieves, stopping giving zakat to mu'allaf, not dividing spoils of war between Muslim soldiers. Regarding some of these ijtihad, many people praised Umar's intelligence in grounding Islamic law. However, there are also some scholars who make Umar the pioneer of sharia deconstruction. This article attempts to examine Umar's ijtihad with the maqāṣid al-syarī'ah approach. Through research of the type of library research with a descriptive-analytic approach, it can be concluded that, first: Umar's ijtihad in some of the above cases did not actually deconstruct Islamic law, but because of his intelligence and foresight in seeing the factors that could hinder the implementation of these lawsuits. Second: Umar bin Khaṭṭab saw the naṣ textually and contextually in a balanced way, without annulling the existing naṣ.
Co-Authors Abdurahim Abdurahim