Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.947
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal el hisbah: Journal of Islamic Economic Law Averroes: Journal for Science and Religious Studies
Ahmad Fauzan
Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
Religion Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Terhadap Praktik Undian Berhadiah Ahmad Fauzan; Mufli Nurbaet
el hisbah: Journal of Islamic Economic Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (124.996 KB) | DOI: 10.28918/el_hisbah.v3i1.7357

Abstract

Praktik undian berhadiah giveaway berdasarkan analisis Hukum Ekonomi Syariah pada akun Instagram @krd.shopgaming. Adapun kegunaan penelitian ini yang pertama ialah manfaat teoritis, sebagai sumber informasi tentang praktik undian berhadiah giveaway via instagram menurut Hukum Ekonomi Syariah khususnya, selain itu juga bisa digunakan sebagai bahan rujukan untuk penelitian lebih lanjut terkait tema yang sejenis. Manfaat praktis dalam penelitian ini ialah sebagai patokan bagi pelaku bisnis dalam pelaksanaan giveaway sesuai syariat ajaran agama Islam, kemudian dapat dijadikan pertimbangan jika menemui hal yang sama. Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kualitatif, merupakan penelitian yang pengumpulan datanya berdasarkan keadaan obyektif ilmiah (kebalikan dari percobaan/eksperimen) yang mana peneliti menjadi bagian penting dalam penelitian, teknik pengumpulan datanya dibuat dengan cara triangulasi kemudian peneliti langsung terjun ketempat penelitian guna mendapatkan data-data yang dibutuhkan atau biasa disebut penelitian lapangan(field research). Pendekatan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang berdasarkan opini guna penarikan hasil kesimpulannya. Praktik undian berhadiah giveaway pada online shop yang dislenggarakan akun instagram @krd.shopgaming berdasarkan syarat yang sudah ditentukan sebelumnya yaitu praktek pemberian hadiah yang sah dikarenakan para peserta, baik yang memperoleh ataupun yang tidak memperoleh hadiah, Kedua belah pihak ridha/tanpa adanya paksaan, sehingga tidak ada kerugian untuk para peserta.
Religious Norms as State Law: Qanun, Special Autonomy and the Differentiation of Acehnese Law: Norma Keagamaan sebagai Hukum Negara: Qanun, Otonomi Khusus, dan Diferensiasi Hukum Aceh Ahmad Fauzan; Mrahmatullah Afiat
Averroes: Journal for Science and Religious Studies Vol. 2 No. 02 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Insan Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62446/averroes.v2i02.310

Abstract

Background: Aceh is the only Indonesian province authorized to translate Islamic religious norms into binding regional legislation through qanun. Existing scholarship has largely examined qanun as an instrument for implementing Islamic law and has focused on the legal basis of Aceh’s authority. Less attention has been given to how this differentiated regulatory authority is controlled and how its relationship with Indonesia’s national legal system has evolved.  Methods: This study employs normative legal research using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. It analyses the legal framework governing Aceh’s special autonomy, particularly the Aceh Governance Law, Law No. 1 of 2023, and relevant decisions of the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court concerning the formation, review, and substance of qanun.  Key Findings: The study finds that Article 235(4) of the Aceh Governance Law initially placed qanun concerning the implementation of Islamic law in a distinctive position by limiting their annulment to judicial review by the Supreme Court. Following the Constitutional Court’s removal of the executive’s authority to annul regional regulations, this procedural distinction between Aceh and other regions diminished. Judicial review of qanun, however, has remained limited, with Supreme Court Decision No. 60 P/HUM/2015 constituting a significant example concerning the Qanun Jinayat. The implementation of the 2023 Criminal Code also presents a further challenge concerning the substantive relationship between Aceh’s qanun and national criminal law.  Contributions: This study contributes to the literature by reframing the analysis of Aceh’s legal exceptionalism from the question of legislative authority to the relationship between differentiated regulatory substance and mechanisms of legal control. It demonstrates that Aceh’s distinctiveness cannot be adequately explained by its review mechanism alone, particularly after the convergence of regional regulatory control mechanisms.  Conclusion: Aceh’s special legal status is best understood as differentiated regulatory authority within Indonesia’s unitary legal system rather than as a separate legal order. Its continuing distinctiveness therefore depends primarily on the substantive scope of qanun and their compatibility with the national legal framework.
A Re-examination of the Law on Child Marriage Following the Enactment of Law No. 16 of 2019: A Maqasid al-Shari’ah Perspective Ahmad Fauzan; Edi Subhan
Averroes: Journal for Science and Religious Studies Vol. 2 No. 01 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Insan Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62446/averroes.020106

Abstract

Background Study: Law Number 16 of 2019 sets the minimum marriage age at 19 years while permitting dispensation under Article 7(2) in urgent circumstances. However, the absence of clear substantive criteria risks transforming this exception into a routine practice. Methods: This normative legal study applies statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. It examines relevant legislation, Constitutional Court Decision Number 22/PUU-XV/2017, Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019, the Compilation of Islamic Law, a court ruling, and marriage dispensation data from the Religious Courts Agency. Funding: The study received no specific funding and was independently conducted using publicly available legal materials, literature, and case data. Contribution: The study argues that the central problem lies not in the 19-year age threshold but in the weak substantive standards for granting dispensation. It reconstructs maqasid al-shari'ah from an explanatory framework into a tiered assessment instrument comprising four elements: qualification of urgent circumstances, assessment of less harmful alternatives, five domains of readiness as evidentiary criteria, and safeguards for the continuity of children's education. Conclusion: Marriage dispensation remains necessary as an exception but requires clear substantive thresholds to prevent it from becoming a parallel rule. This framework offers a more operational basis for adjudication. Further empirical research should examine more rulings and involve judges, children, parents, and other stakeholders.
Fatwa Authorities and the Binding Nature of Sharia Norms on ‘Buy Now, Pay Later’: An Analysis of Regulatory Design to Strengthen the Governance of Sharia-Compliant BNPL in Indonesia and Malaysia Viola Tajzahra; Ahmad Fauzan
Averroes: Journal for Science and Religious Studies Vol. 2 No. 03 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Insan Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62446/averroes.020306

Abstract

Background Study: Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) has rapidly become a major consumer financing mechanism in Southeast Asia, creating regulatory challenges for both state and Shariah authorities. Although previous Islamic legal scholarship has primarily assessed BNPL through contract classification and the prohibitions of riba, gharar, and maysir, limited attention has been paid to how institutional authority determines the normative and regulatory force of Shariah principles. This study addresses this gap through a comparison of Indonesia and Malaysia. Methods: Employing a normative juridical methodology, this study combines comparative, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The analysis draws on classical fiqh literature, MUI and DSN-MUI fatwas, the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law, AAOIFI Shariah standards, Indonesian financial regulations, and Malaysia’s statutory and policy frameworks governing Shariah governance and consumer credit. Key Findings: The findings reveal an authority disarticulation in Indonesia, where Shariah norms face institutional discontinuity when BNPL providers lack Shariah Supervisory Boards. State regulation consequently operates mainly through consumer protection and prudential mechanisms. Malaysia demonstrates a more integrated statutory architecture, although substantive Shariah concerns remain, particularly regarding tawarruq-based BNPL structures. Contribution: This study contributes the concept of authority disarticulation, distinguishes formal from substantive Shariah compliance, and develops a four-dimensional framework for analyzing Shariah authority design. Conclusion: The study proposes a two-track codification model combining universal behavioral standards for all BNPL providers with Shariah-specific labeling and certification. Such integration is necessary to align normative authority, regulatory enforcement, and consumer protection while preserving the substantive integrity of Shariah-compliant BNPL products.
The Legal Vacuum in the Pekalongan Regency Local Regulation on the Facilitation of Islamic Boarding Schools Regarding the Authority of the Majelis Masyayikh from the Perspective of Maqasid al-Shari’ah: Kekosongan Hukum Perda Fasilitasi Pesantren Kabupaten Pekalongan atas Kewenangan Majelis Masyayikh dalam Perspektif Maqasid al-Syariah Ahmad Fauzan; Trisna Ramudia
Averroes: Journal for Science and Religious Studies Vol. 1 No. 03 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Insan Cendekia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62446/averroes.010306

Abstract

Background Study: This study examines the legal vacuum in Regional Regulation of Pekalongan Regency Number 3 of 2023 concerning the Facilitation of Pesantren Development in relation to Law Number 18 of 2019 concerning Pesantren. The primary concern is the absence of provisions governing the position, duties, coordination, and funding of the Majelis Masyayikh, which plays a crucial role in pesantren quality assurance. Methods: This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. It analyzes relevant legislation, secondary legal materials, and compares Pekalongan Regency Regulation with West Bandung Regency Regulation Number 5 of 2022 and Grobogan Regency Regulation Number 1 of 2023. Key Findings: The findings reveal a legal vacuum (rechtsvacuum/al-faragh al-tasyri‘i) in the Pekalongan Regency Regulation due to its inadequate accommodation of the Pesantren Law's mandate concerning the Majelis Masyayikh, quality assurance, institutional coordination, and funding. These omissions undermine legal certainty, weaken institutional coordination and quality oversight, and potentially widen disparities in pesantren educational quality. Contribution: This study integrates regulatory harmonization, the distribution of authority from the perspective of siyasah dusturiyah, and substantive evaluation through maqasid al-shariah. It proposes regulatory reconstruction addressing the institutional position and coordination of the Majelis Masyayikh, funding mechanisms, community participation, and quality assurance monitoring and evaluation. Conclusion: Regional Regulation of Pekalongan Regency Number 3 of 2023 has not fully operationalized the Pesantren Law's mandate. Regulatory harmonization and reconstruction are necessary to ensure that pesantren facilitation extends beyond administrative support to effective quality assurance and the realization of public welfare and the common good.
Co-Authors Edi Subhan Mrahmatullah Afiat Mufli Nurbaet Trisna Ramudia Viola Tajzahra