Nina Widyawati, Nina
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Peran Pemerintah, Kapitalis, dan Netters dalam Mengontrol Media (Analisis terhadap Studi Media di LIPI) Widyawati, Nina
Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya Vol 19, No 3 (2017)
Publisher : P2KK LIPI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (363.865 KB) | DOI: 10.14203/jmb.v19i3.547

Abstract

Studi media di LIPI berjalan seiring dengan isu-isu yang hangat di jamannya. Dimulai tahun 1976 ketika pemerintah Orde Baru ingin menggunakan televisi sebagai alat pembangunan. Pemerintah memutuskan untuk memiliki Sistem Komunikasi Satelit Domestik agar siaran televisi bisa diakses oleh seluruh masyarakat Indonesia. Akses televisi yang luas dirancang untuk mempertahankan status quo dengan cara menyiarkan keberhasilan pemerintah. Kenyataannya televisi tidak hanya memiliki dampak positif, tetapi juga menimbulkan dampak negatif. Oleh karena itu, sejak akhir pemerintahan Orde Baru sampai awal runtuhnya Orde Baru, LIPI banyak melakukan studi media effect menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Setelah Orde Baru runtuh, sistem pemerintahan juga berubah dari sentralistis menjadi desentralistis. Media juga tumbuh menjadi institusi yang lebih demokratis. Pada saat yang sama, kapitalisasi media berkembang pesat. Industri media dikusasi oleh kapitalis dan hal ini kemudian berpengaruh kepada kebijakan dalam menentukan konten. Berkembanglah studi-studi kritis seperti ekonomi politik media dan analisis wacana kritis. Ketika TIK berkembang, peran kapitalis dalam mengontrol konten mulai digeser oleh netters. Pada era ini, LIPI melakukan studi tentang masyarakat jaringan. Dengan demikian, pola perkembangan studi media di LIPI tidak jauh berbeda dengan yang terjadi di Amerika dan Eropa. Perubahan suatu rezim berpengaruh terhadap peran media yang pada akhirnya mempengaruhi tema studi. Bedanya, studi di LIPI lebih lambat antara 10-20 tahun dari perkembangan studi di Amerika dan Eropa.ngontrol konten mulai digeser oleh netters. Pada era ini LIPI melakukan studi tentang masyarakat jaringan. Dengan demikian pola perkembangan studi media di LIPI tidak jauh berbeda dengan yang terjadi di Amerika dan Eropa. Perubahan suatu rejim berpengaruh terhadap peran media yang pada akhirnya mempengaruhi tema studi. Bedanya studi di LIPI lebih lambat antara 10-20 tahun dengan perkembangan studi di Amerika dan Eropa. Research about Media at LIPI goes hand in hand with the important issues of the era. Started in 1976 when the New Order Government wanted to use television for development tools. The government built Sistem Komunikasi Satelit Domestik (Domestic Satellite Communications System) for television to be able to be accessed by all Indonesian. On the one hand, television access is designed to maintain the status quo by broadcasting the success of the government, but on the other hand, there are negative impact. Therefore, started from the end of the New Order Government until the beginning of the fall, LIPI conducted media effect studies with quantitative approach. The fall of New Order has changed the system from centralized to decentralized, consequently, the media has also grown into a more democratic one. At that time, capitalization of media industry begins to flourish, as an effect the media industry is exploited by the capitalist which able to influence the policy by determining the content. This era, media research at LIPI employs critical approach such as the political economy of media and critical discourse analysis. When ICT develops the role of capitalist in controlling content, began to be shifted by netters, LIPI conducts studies about network society. Thus, the pattern of media research in Indonesia is not much different from that occurred in America and Europe. The change of a regime influences the role of the media that ultimately affects the theme of the study. The difference of media study in LIPI is 10 to 20 years slower in comparison with similar study in America and Europe.
EQUIVOCALITY DALAM KOMUNIKASI ORGANISASI: STUDI KASUS PERBEDAAN PENAFSIRAN INFORMASI PUBLIK DIKECUALIKAN PADA KEMENTERIAN KEUANGAN Nugraha, Amalia; Widyawati, Nina; Purwadi, Purwadi
Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media Vol 27 No 2 (2023): JURNAL STUDI KOMUNIKASI DAN MEDIA (JSKM)
Publisher : BPSDMP Kominfo Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17933/jskm.2023.5342

Abstract

In this age of freedom of information, people want the government to provide excellent and transparent public information services. Unfortunately, these demands sometimes experience obstacles due to equivocality in organizational communication. One case was the occurrence of equivocality of excluded public information (or can be interpreted as confidential information) in the Ministry of Finance, which was interesting to study further. This research tried to examine comprehension differences to uncover the causes of public information service officers' interpretation differences and ways to overcome them. This research approach was qualitative with a case study method. The research results identified several causes for differences in the interpretation of confidential public information, including concerns regarding negative impacts, potential misuse of information by applicants, political aspects of the information requested, and officers' lack of understanding in interpreting excluded public information. In overcoming differences in interpretation, personnel (public information service officers) had an important role and were responsible for overcoming equivalency in organizational communication. In addition, intensive meetings, consequence tests, annual monitoring and evaluation, minutes of agreements, training, the legal classification of information, firmness in decision-making, and knowledge internalization were used to resolve interpretation differences.